Daily Mail, on UK Politics, 7 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Private school teacher defends giving pupil books containing sex, nudity and drugs pictures saying A-level students are 'young adults'

No framing issues found.

A private school teacher has defended giving a 'very vulnerable' pupil books containing sex, nudity and pictures of drugs. Fiona Simpson, who taught A-level photography at £51,552-a-year Burlington House School, argued they 'are not primary school children; they are young adults'. The school, located in Fulham, west London , caters to pupils with special educational needs and boasts of teaching 'tailored to the individual'. Ms Simpson, who worked part-time at the school between November 2022 and March 2023, said she did not 'believe in censoring the arts'.

The books provided to Pupil B were Diary by Corinne Day and Emotions and Relations, with a witness spotting a sticky note with the child's first initial on one of the books. Inside the books were images of drug use, oral sex, a naked man, as well as a blood-splattered bedroom. Ms Simpson argued to a Teaching Regulation Agency panel that pupils 'should definitely know about the history of photography and the key figures within it.' However, despite the panel describing her explanation as 'misguided', the photography teacher avoided a ban from the profession.

The panel said the use of the artists was not inherently inappropriate, but that the concern 'is about the apparent disregard for the needs of a vulnerable pupil'. It added that there was no evidence to suggest there was 'any material supervision, support or contextualisation' in the research to these 'highly graphic images'. Fiona Simpson (pictured) has defended giving a 'very vulnerable' pupil books containing sex, nudity and pictures of drugs Ms Simpson, who taught A-level photography at £51,552-a-year Burlington House School (pictured), argued they 'are not primary school children; they are young adults'. 'It ought to have been readily apparent to Ms Simpson that providing this material in such an unstructured fashion to a vulnerable pupil came with significant risk to their wellbeing. 'There was no suggestion that Ms Simpson gave any consideration to this risk or explored how it might be best to approach such sensitive imagery with other professional colleagues.'

Ms Simpson, who began working at the independent SEN school in November 2022, was found to have tapped the pupil on the bottom with a book or magazine. CCTV footage showed her swinging the item towards the pupil as they walked ahead of her, the panel wrote. She said the contact was unintentional and was a gesture encouraging the pupil to return to class. But the panel concluded the contact was 'inappropriate' and 'entirely unwarranted'.

She also took an unwell pupil to a cafe during school hours, which the panel ruled was a safeguarding failure. Burlington House School dismissed Ms Simpson during her probationary period in March 2023 and referred her to the TRA that June. After a hearing in October 2026, the panel found Ms Simpson guilty of unacceptable professional conduct. But it recommended that she should not be banned from teaching, saying her misconduct was at the 'lower possible end of the spectrum'.

The panel said there was no evidence Ms Simpson had developed insight into her behaviour and warned there was a risk it could be repeated. But it concluded that publishing its findings would alert any employers to the risks and allow schools to put appropriate supervision in place. It was also heard that Ms Simpson was previously found guilty at West London Magistrates Court for drink driving on October 22, 2021. She was also found guilty at the same court for assault by beating of an emergency worker on July 17, 2023.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Daily Mail reports a Teaching Regulation Agency panel's findings against a former A-level photography teacher at a special educational needs school, her defence, and the panel's decision not to ban her. It gives the teacher's own account alongside the panel's reasoning. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “The panel said the use of the artists was not inherently inappropriate, but that the concern 'is about the apparent disregard for the needs of a vulnerable pupil'.”

    The Mail reports the panel's actual finding: the books themselves were not judged wrong, and the failing was the lack of care for one vulnerable pupil. This stops a reader concluding that teaching these photographers was itself the misconduct.

  • “She said the contact was unintentional and was a gesture encouraging the pupil to return to class.”

    The Mail gives the teacher's own explanation of the physical contact before it reports the panel's conclusion, so the reader hears both.

  • “it recommended that she should not be banned from teaching, saying her misconduct was at the 'lower possible end of the spectrum'”

    The Mail reports the outcome and the panel's own words on how serious the misconduct was, so the reader knows how the regulator weighed it.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 7 NovANOTHER British multi-millionaire threatens to quit the UK - blaming Labour tax rises for plunging nation into 'vicious downward death spiral'6.0
  2. 7 NovKemi Badenoch turns on Trump: Tory leader says President deserved 'entirely self-inflicted' mid-term thrashing3.0
  3. 7 NovIt will cost £6BILLION to get young people back into work, Alan Milburn tells Andy Burnham6.0
  4. 7 NovThe return of Project Fear: Treasury to outline PM's Brexit reset plan with Brussels in echo of Remain's scare tactics7.3
  5. 7 NovWhistleblower warns that Labour's conversion therapy ban would have been used to suppress scandal at NHS gender clinic for children6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail