Al-Monitor, on Iran, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran sees only unacceptable ideas in latest mediation to end war, official says

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

By Andrew Mills and Parisa Hafezi Oct 28 (Reuters) - Qatari mediators have presented Iran with a new draft deal to end the war with the US and Israel, an official briefed on the negotiations said, but a senior Iranian official said Doha had only put forward unacceptable ideas that did not amount to an offer. The official briefed on the negotiations, who is not from Iran, said a new draft peace proposal for the eight-month-old conflict was presented on Sunday and was being considered by Tehran, with a response expected by the end of the week.

Qatar, along with Pakistan, has led mediation to end the war, which has disrupted global shipping and oil supplies and recently spread to Saudi Arabia and Yemen. The proposal presented by Qatar sets a seven-day timeline addressing both Tehran's and Washington's concerns, laying out daily confidence-building steps that each side must take, the official briefed on the negotiations said. The timeline could begin early next week and several countries would act as guarantors of the deal, the official added.

Shortly afterwards, a senior Iranian official involved in the talks said Qatar had presented only "unacceptable ideas and not an offer", and that Tehran's policy on showing no flexibility over the nuclear issue remained unchanged. Washington wants Iran's decades-long nuclear programme to be part of negotiations to end the war from the outset, while Iran says its conditions — which include an end to the US blockade of Iranian ports and the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil exports — must be met first.

Iran rejects Western concerns ​that ⁠its nuclear programme is military in nature. ATTACK ON SAUDI OIL REFINERY In late September, Iran presented another seven-day proposal under which Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important energy shipping channels, could be reopened if certain conditions were met. US President Donald Trump rejected it, prompting further Qatari mediation. The draft discussed in Tehran on Sunday was different from that proposal, the official briefed on the negotiations said, though the details of the latest plan were not immediately clear.

The official had previously told Reuters that the Qatari mediators had coordinated with Washington before going to Tehran. Earlier mediation efforts to end the war that the US and Israel launched on February 28 helped produce an interim peace agreement in June, but it quickly unravelled. In recent weeks, Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi forces have launched repeated attacks against Saudi Arabia — a key US ally and the world's largest crude exporter — opening a new front in the eight-month-old war.

Oil prices rose more than 1% to more than $115 per barrel on Wednesday after a Houthi attack on Saudi Arabia's largest oil refinery, Ras Tanura, stoking concerns over supply risks. Fighting with the Houthis intensified last month as advanced against Saudi-backed forces towards the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, another important shipping lane on the other side of the Arabian Peninsula from Hormuz. CONCERNS ABOUT RISK OF NEW STRIKES The official briefed on the negotiations said there were concerns ahead of Sunday's meeting in Tehran that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, fighting for another term in a general election, could resume attacks on the Islamic Republic this week.

On Friday, US President Donald Trump repeated threats to strike Iran again, while Iranian security officials told Reuters Tehran had drawn up detailed plans to attack Gulf undersea cables if the US and Israel resumed attacks. On Monday, top officials from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan also met Iranian officials in Tehran as part of de-escalation efforts. Qatar said on Tuesday that Iran needs to stop threats against Arab Gulf states and open the Strait of Hormuz to show good intentions for mediation efforts to succeed.

Gulf states came under sustained bombardment earlier in the war. The war also reignited fighting between Israel and the Iran-backed Lebanese armed group Hezbollah. It has eroded Trump's approval ratings ahead of the US midterm elections that decide control of Congress. (Reporting by Andrew Mills and Parisa Hafezi; Writing by Nayera Adballah; Editing by Aidan Lewis)

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al-Monitor runs a Reuters report on a new Qatari draft deal to end the war, setting the mediator-side official's account against a senior Iranian official's rejection. It names the US and Israel as the parties that launched the war and reports Western claims about Iran's nuclear programme as claims. The only flaw is a minor one: it calls the Houthis "the militant group" in its own voice.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the militant group”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor calls the Houthis "the militant group" in its own narration, with no source attached to the label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Houthis as an irregular militant band, as an established fact rather than a description someone chose.
    The context
    Elsewhere the same article names the group plainly as "Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi forces". The label adds a verdict in this sentence that the article's facts do not supply.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthi forces have launched repeated attacks”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the war that the US and Israel launched on February 28”

    It names who started the war and when, so the reader does not take the war as something that simply erupted.

  • “Iran rejects Western concerns ​that ⁠its nuclear programme is military in nature.”

    It reports the weapons claim as a Western concern, not as fact, and gives Iran's rejection of it.

  • “which include an end to the US blockade of Iranian ports and the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil exports”

    It states Iran's own conditions for ending the war and names the US as the party maintaining the blockade.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 28 OctIran war has cost Pentagon more than $47B: What to know3.0
  2. 28 OctQatari mediators present Iran with new deal to end the war, official says0.0
  3. 28 OctUS costs of Iran war rise to over $47 billion, according to Pentagon estimate0.0
  4. 27 OctHow wartime urgency pushed Iran to court Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan3.0
  5. 27 OctUN nuclear watchdog chief urges Iran to grant access6.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor