The National, on Lebanon, 21 October 2026

The National reports a tunnel panic near Beirut and sensibly debunks it, but in its own voice it hands Hezbollah a grave unsupported allegation of "bombings of political opponents" and gives the closing word to an anti-Hezbollah party official's claim that Hezbollah's arms are what put Lebanon at risk of war, with nothing set against it even though the article itself records Israeli bombings and occupation. Its own default description of Hezbollah as "an Iran-backed Shiite militia" folds a Lebanese political force, and a sect, into a foreign-backed armed group.

7.3

Serious

out of 10

What we found

  1. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “given its connection to bombings of political opponents in the past”

    What the words do
    The National asserts in its own voice that Hezbollah has a "connection to bombings of political opponents", with no source, no case and no date attached.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That it is established fact that Hezbollah has bombed its domestic political rivals, so its statement about the explosives can be dismissed.
    What is actually the case
    The article offers nothing at all to back the allegation: no investigation, no court finding, no named accuser. It is the outlet's own unsupported charge of political murder used to dispose of Hezbollah's stated account.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hezbollah says the explosives were only for use against Israel. Opponents of the party, including MP Samy Gemayel, say its weapons threaten domestic rivals; Hezbollah rejects that.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “as long as Hezbollah still has one arm left, we are at risk of another war at any time”

    What the words do
    The National closes the article on a Lebanese Forces official's claim that Hezbollah's weapons are what expose Lebanon to war, with nothing placed against it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the risk of renewed war in Lebanon rests on Hezbollah's arsenal alone.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself records Israeli bombings and occupation of the southern border region, and an Israeli surveillance drone over Beirut as the reporter worked. Israel invaded southern Lebanon, bombarded Beirut and holds a self-declared zone in the south. That contest is left out of the final passage.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a stalled plan to halt Israeli bombings and occupation in the southern border region”
    • On the recordIsrael invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut and other areas.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordIsrael occupies a self-declared security zone in southern Lebanon.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hezbollah's opponents say its weapons are the cause of the tension; Hezbollah points to continuing Israeli bombing and Israel's occupation of the southern border region as the reason it keeps them.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “an Iran-backed Shiite militia and political party”

    What the words do
    The National makes "Iran-backed" and "Shiite militia" its own default description of Hezbollah, with no source for the modifier.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Hezbollah is chiefly a foreign-sponsored sectarian armed group rather than a Lebanese political force with a parliamentary bloc and a constituency.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own reporting shows Hezbollah operating inside Lebanese politics, under government pressure to disarm and answering a US-driven push. The outlet uses the same unattributed "Iran-backed" tag as a habit of description.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “widely understood to be Hezbollah members or supporters”

    What the words do
    The National identifies the men who surrounded the police as Hezbollah members or supporters while attributing it to no one, using "widely understood" in place of a source.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That it is confirmed Hezbollah confronted the police at the warehouse.
    What is actually the case
    The article names no source for the identification, and the outlet reported two days earlier that the son of Hezbollah's secretary general publicly denied any link to the warehouse.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Samy Gemayel, a prominent anti-Hezbollah MP, said after news of the tunnel broke”

    What the words do
    Gives a long block quote to an anti-Hezbollah MP calling for a "definitive end" to Hezbollah's arms.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the serious reading of the tunnel story is the one offered by Hezbollah's opponents.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own reporting establishes the tunnel held only digging tools and was probably a drug drop site, which the MP's quote treats as a "dangerous indicator".

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“contained neither weapons nor gold, only digging tools”

    Show it in the article

    “said a senior official of the Lebanese Forces, parliament's largest party, which has long called for Hezbollah's disarmament”

    What the words do
    Closes the article with two further quotes from a second anti-Hezbollah party, after an unnamed security source and the Gemayel quote.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Hezbollah's critics are the main voices with something to say about the week's events.
    What is actually the case
    Hezbollah's own position appears in a single sentence, and residents of the southern suburbs where the confrontations happened are not quoted at all.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“A Hezbollah official conceded that”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

'A sign of the tensions': Why a small tunnel sparked hysteria in Lebanon

When a passer-by stumbled upon a tunnel north-east of <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/">Beirut</a> earlier this week, almost immediately alarm bells began ringing over fears it could be connected to Hezbollah. It was the latest in a series of recent incidents that have <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/">raised tensions</a> in an uneasy and deeply divided Lebanon, where Hezbollah has resisted government pressure to disarm as part of a stalled plan to halt Israeli bombings and occupation in the southern border region. The discovery of the tunnel in Fanar sparked a deluge of theories online. Some suggested that Hezbollah, , was building military infrastructure right in the Christian heartland of northern Matn. Others claimed gold prospectors had dug the tunnel. “You can't blame the people. It's because of the whole situation," said a Lebanese security source. "It's a sign of the tensions.” One of Israel's surveillance drones buzzed overhead as they spoke, making a return to the capital after an absence of a few weeks. Ultimately, the alarm over the tunnel appears to have been a storm in a teacup. The Lebanese army was sent to investigate and reported that it descended five metres before extending eight metres horizontally and contained neither weapons nor gold, only digging tools. The current theory is that it was probably a drop site for drug dealers, although no narcotics were found. “It's not for weapons. Maybe for drugs, but for sure not related to ammunition or weapons. It's very primitive, no way it would be for weapons,” said the Lebanese security official. They said the tunnel was very narrow and difficult to manoeuvre inside. “If it was gold I would be there, not here in the office,” they quipped. Another round of unfounded alarm followed the recent revelation that a Shiite businessman had bought dozens of plots of land in northern Matn between 2008 and 2014, allegedly to create a “Shiite crescent” there, according to MTV, a strongly anti-Hezbollah TV station. The businessman, Rida Jaffal, turned out to have no connection to Hezbollah and denied any “political or security project” or links to sanctioned people or groups. Other events that sparked alarm have been very real, and reflect fears that another round of war or internal violence could break out. They include the seizure of half a tonne of explosives from a vehicle travelling towards Beirut that Hezbollah has claimed, and confrontations between youths and security forces in the southern areas of Beirut, a stronghold of the group. “A tunnel in Matn, explosives in Dahr Al Baidar, and clashes with security forces in the southern suburbs … these are dangerous indicators that necessitate putting a definitive end … to Hezbollah's military organisation across all Lebanese territories,” . The clashes he referred to took place last week in the Gallerie Semaan neighbourhood on the edge of Beirut's southern suburbs, where police were sent to raid a warehouse that contained expired medicines, following an order from prosecutors. Upon arrival, they were surrounded by “a number of young men” – – before the army was deployed to calm the situation. The two men were detained over the explosives seizure in Dahr Al Baidar, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam has ordered the security forces to expand their investigation. Hezbollah's insistence that the explosives were only for use against Israel has failed to assuage fears, . The Lebanese army itself has come under pressure both domestically and from abroad – mainly from the US and Israel – for not being proactive enough in containing Hezbollah's arsenal. Senior Lebanese officials are fearful that if the army were to directly confront the group, it could spark a civil war. A Hezbollah official conceded that “no doubt tensions are increasing”, but blamed a US interest in “creating an internal rift” and “internal authorities that seemingly follow every American interest”. US Secretary of State <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/19/lebanese-army-bolsters-beirut-patrols-after-tensions-surge/">Marco Rubio</a> called President Joseph Aoun last week and urged him to ensure the explosives seized from Hezbollah were not returned despite its demands. For political opponents of Hezbollah, the cause of the current tensions is clear. “Look, [the situation is] delicate because Hezbollah is refusing to update its system. Remove Hezbollah from the equation and there's nothing delicate any more,” . “Everybody knows that .”

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

Everything we scored from The National