Daily Star, on UK Politics, 1 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

as the Chancellor issued an update on the BBC. John Healey appeared on the BBC today, Sunday, November 1, to confirm "big changes" to benefits as he vowed to cut the welfare bill. Speaking on the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg show, he revealed that two key proposals sit at the heart of Andy Burnham's administration's plans.

The first comes from senior Labour figure Alan Milburn, a former health secretary, who is reportedly drawing up plans to potentially scrap PIP and Universal Credit for young people. The second is a proposal being drafted by DWP minister Sir Stephen Timms to overhaul the 'not fit for purpose' PIP system. This provides additional payments to certain individuals with a disability or physical or mental health condition. Speaking this morning, Mr Healey was adamant that Britain's welfare bill would be brought down.

He described it as a "national scandal" that one million young people across Britain are not in work, employment, education or training. He said a million youngsters were being "written off by the benefits system at the moment" - and stressed the government had a "moral duty" to address it. "The overall bill will come down under Labour," he pledged. "We'll start the changes next year, and we'll bring that bill down, and we've already demonstrated how we'll do that for the long-term."

He added: "This is a system which is not working. We have to make big changes. We will. "We'll do it after the reports from Milburn and Timms this month, and we'll do it, and I set this out in the Budget, with the new White Paper, the Government policy set out in the new year, and next year we'll also legislate. Now that will bring the bill down. "We've set out the timetable for changes." Ms Kuenssberg noted what he was suggesting could represent reductions of about £100 billion, reports Wales Online .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article ends Healey's remarks on "We've set out the timetable for changes" and "we'll bring that bill down". It leaves out that Healey said he "never set out the timetable for savings" and declined to say whether the welfare bill would fall before the next election. Without this, a reader may believe he committed to cutting the bill from next year.

How we know

After presenting this to the Chancellor, he responded: "The overall bill must come down. There's nothing progressive in a bigger and bigger benefits bill." The Milburn proposal is poised to overhaul the current situation for so-called NEETs in Britain – youngsters not in employment, education and training. Mr Milburn said last month in a Guardian interview that "we've got to have a different conversation about the welfare system, it just isn't working for young people.

We need to redistribute money from the welfare system to more employment support if we are going to end the Neet crisis." The Financial Times says the blueprint due to be presented to Prime Minister Andy Burnham would see PIP and Universal Credit potentially scrapped for this cohort of one million individuals. And the FT's public policy editor Chris Smyth says it is understood that Mr Burnham backs the proposals. The PM said in a speech at the time the reports were broadcast that he wanted to witness a 'sea change' in how the government approaches young people.

He said: "Obviously we're anticipating the report from Alan Milburn next month. And we're beginning now to think about how we respond to that report. It's got to be a huge change. It's not just a DWP report. "We've got to think about a whole government, whole society change in the way we support young people - a social contract. That's what I said in my conference speech in Liverpool. What are we going to do for young people? What guarantees are we going to give them?

"I believe we need a new guarantee of support when young people need it. But then a clear expectation that young people take up that support and we provide it as in-work support because it's not going to be good for anybody to be out of work in their 20s. "So that's the way our thinking is developing. At the moment, you go to the benefits system, you get three things, an assessment, a payment and then a goodbye. And you then you are just forgotten to some degree.

Where are you? Where are you going? That just isn't good enough. I want to put in place an approach where we do give a new guarantee for young people." Mr Smyth told the FT's Political Fix podcast last month that the blueprint Mr Milburn is putting together could result in the amount of money handed to young people being cut. He said: "The key welfare recommendation is going to be essentially a separate benefits system for young people and the contentious bit of that is they would get less cash in exchange for more intensive health and employment support.

And the idea of this is saying, look, the need of a NEET who has never worked is very distinct from someone who is in their 50s and has fallen out of employment after a long period. "You may need some sort of cash to tide them over to get a job whereas NEET, their key ask is something that will actually put them on the path to getting a job rather than staying on those benefits. "However, he is saying the way to fund that is through the cash payments that they get and also sometimes those cash payments can be a barrier because they can disincentivise people from looking for jobs.

"This will possibly replace Universal Credit and maybe even PIP as well. So it is quite far-reaching and all the indications are that Andy Burnham is on board with this." See the full BBC interview with the Chancellor here .

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Daily Star says in its own voice that a million young Brits face uncertainty over their Universal Credit and PIP payments, but its own body shows the million is Healey's count of young people not in work, education or training, not a count of claimants. Its headline also inflates the body's figure to over one million. It leaves out that Healey said he never set out a timetable for savings.

  1. Uses figures that mislead

    Serious

    “A million young Brits are today facing uncertainty over the future of their Universal Credit and PIP payments”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Daily Star says a million young Brits face uncertainty over "their Universal Credit and PIP payments", which presents the million as a count of benefit recipients.
    The impression it gives
    That one million young people currently receive Universal Credit and PIP and stand to lose them.
    The context
    The article's own source for the million is Healey's figure for young people not in work, education or training. Being outside work or education is not the same as claiming Universal Credit, and the article gives no figure for how many of them claim either benefit.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“one million young people across Britain are not in work, employment, education or training”
    • Elsewhere in the article“youngsters not in employment, education and training”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Healey says one million young people are not in work, education or training; reports say a Milburn plan could cut or replace benefits for those among them who claim.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Over one million Brits face Universal Credit and PIP uncertainty after John Healey update”

    Why this matters
    The headline says "Over one million Brits" face uncertainty over Universal Credit and PIP "after John Healey update", so it ties both the figure and the threat to the Chancellor's interview.
    The impression it gives
    That more than a million people on these benefits were put at risk by something Healey announced.
    The context
    The body gives "a million", not over a million. Healey only promised the overall bill would come down. The idea of scrapping PIP and Universal Credit for young people comes from reports about Alan Milburn's draft plans, which the article attributes to the Financial Times, not to Healey.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“reportedly drawing up plans to potentially scrap PIP and Universal Credit for young people”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The Financial Times says the blueprint due to be presented”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The overall bill will come down under Labour”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article ends Healey's remarks on "We've set out the timetable for changes" and "we'll bring that bill down". It leaves out that Healey said he "never set out the timetable for savings" and declined to say whether the welfare bill would fall before the next election. Without this, a reader may believe he committed to cutting the bill from next year.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 1 NovAndy Burnham's Government cause '£49bn black hole in UK finances'3.0
  2. 1 NovAndy Burnham's government suffer major embarrassment as mega-wave of migrants cross channel6.0
  3. 31 OctLaura Kuenssberg claims she found MP 'waiting in bed with partner' who 'wanted threesome'3.0
  4. 31 OctBritain 'not prepared' for WW3 as army chief warns 'Russia is serious, we are not'6.0
  5. 31 OctAndy Burnham 'open' to calls for Britain to offer slavery apology but rules out reparations0.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star