The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 8 November 2026

9.1out of 10Severe

In Latin America Outreach, Settler Leader Yisrael Ganz Seeks Allies Against European Sanctions

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Buenos Aires. and a wave of European sanctions targeting , one of Israel's prominent settler leaders took his campaign across the Atlantic this week in a bid to secure unlikely allies.Yisrael Ganz, head of both the Yesha Council, the umbrella organization , and the Binyamin Regional Council, concluded a multi-nation diplomatic tour across Latin America.

Traveling through Argentina, Guatemala, and Mexico alongside Eliana Passentin, head of Binyamin's foreign desk, Ganz sought to bypass traditional European diplomatic channels in favor of engagement with sympathetic foreign governments and regional Jewish leaders.Direct Appeal to Milei at Casa RosadaThe centerpiece of the tour unfolded in Buenos Aires, where Argentine President Javier Milei hosted Ganz for an hour-long discussion at Casa Rosada.

Facilitated by Rabbi Richard Kaufman, a personal friend of the president, the meeting marked the third interaction between the two men, but their first structured dialogue inside Argentina's presidential seat.Since taking office, Milei has established himself as one of Israel's most vocal and ideological supporters on the world stage. Ganz sought to leverage that goodwill, urging the Argentine leader to publicly reject and .In a move tailored to Argentine political sensitivities, Ganz drew a sharp parallel between the territorial controversy over the Falkland Islands, known across Argentina as the Malvinas, and .

“Britain must be returned to its natural size; the days of the colonial White Paper are over,” Ganz said, evoking the 1939 British mandate policy that severely restricted Jewish immigration to pre-state Israel. “European powers cannot continue to impose their will on other nations. Britain should relinquish its hold over the Malvinas and lift its disgraceful sanctions against Judea and Samaria.” Following the meeting, Milei shared photos of their discussion to his millions of social media followers.

Stepping outside Casa Rosada, Ganz told reporters: “The Jewish people are not foreigners in Binyamin, Judea, or Samaria. This is our ancestral land, and no foreign sanction can sever that connection.”Iranian Shadow and AMIA MemorialBeyond the executive branch, Ganz conferred with four members of the Argentine Congress, arguing that along Israel's eastern frontier.

The delegation also paid an emotional visit to the rebuilt AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires, which was leveled in a 1994 bombing that killed 85 people, an attack widely attributed by international intelligence to Iran and Hezbollah. Accompanied by AMIA President Osvaldo Armoza, Ganz announced plans to erect a memorial in Binyamin dedicated to the victims of the attack, with organizers looking into incorporating two stone fragments preserved from the original destroyed building.

“Thirty-two years ago, Iranian terrorism took 85 lives here,” Ganz said after lighting a memorial candle. “The threat that struck Buenos Aires is the exact same network threatening Israel's survival today. Iran and its proxies must be stopped before they strike again.” The mission wrapped up with political meetings in Guatemala and a Shabbat visit with Mexico's Jewish community, where Ganz pitched regional development initiatives, including a specialized medical facility and local agricultural ventures.

“Where others threaten boycotts, we intend to open doors,” Ganz said. “And where others push sanctions, we will forge direct partnerships.”

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post reports a settler leader's Latin America tour almost entirely in his own vocabulary. It calls the occupied West Bank "Judea and Samaria" and the settlers "residents" and "communities", and it never tells the reader that the International Court of Justice has ruled the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal. It also recasts sanctions that its own earlier report tied to settler violence as punishment of ordinary communities, in a piece written in collaboration with the settler leader's own council.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “consider formal recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the region”

    Why this matters
    The Post reports Ganz's call for recognition of "Israeli sovereignty over the region" with no word on the territory's legal status.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Israeli sovereignty over this land as an open diplomatic question that Argentina could simply choose to recognise.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem is unlawful and its settlements illegal. The article never says occupied, occupation, illegal or unlawful anywhere, though the whole piece turns on the status of this territory.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation”, “illegal” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

    “Amid mounting international scrutiny”

    Why this matters
    The Post describes the backdrop to the sanctions as "mounting international scrutiny".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlements face only growing criticism or political attention, a matter of opinion still being weighed.
    The context
    The status of the settlements is settled in law: the ICJ has found them illegal and the occupation unlawful. Calling that "scrutiny" turns a court ruling into pressure from critics.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Ganz urged Milei to reject sanctions on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and to recognise Israeli sovereignty there. The International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 that the occupation is unlawful and the settlements illegal.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “Israeli residents of Judea and Samaria”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post uses "Judea and Samaria", the biblical name, and calls settlers "Israeli residents".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the territory as an Israeli region with an ordinary resident population, not occupied land.
    The context
    The Post's own report on the same meeting three days earlier said "West Bank" and flagged Ganz as "using the biblical name for the West Bank". This article never uses West Bank or occupied in its own voice.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “representing over 500,000 Israeli residents in the region”

    Why this matters
    The Post defines "the region" only by its Israeli settler population.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the territory is populated by Israelis alone. The Palestinians who live under occupation there do not exist in this article.
    The context
    The ICJ addressed this land as occupied Palestinian territory. The article never mentions Palestinians at all.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice found that Israel's laws and measures in the occupied Palestinian territory breach the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria serve as a strategic security barrier”

    Why this matters
    In paraphrasing Ganz, the Post again calls the settlements "Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the settlements as neutral communities in a named Israeli region.
    The context
    These are settlements the ICJ found illegal, in the occupied West Bank. The Post's earlier report described them as "sanctions on settlements in the West Bank".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Yisrael Ganz heads the Yesha Council, which represents more than 500,000 settlers in the occupied West Bank.

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “the punitive measures leveled against Israeli communities by London”

    Why this matters
    The Post says Britain's measures were "leveled against Israeli communities".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Britain punished ordinary Israeli communities wholesale.
    The context
    The Post's own report on the same meeting said the UK and five other states sanctioned "networks accused of financing and carrying out settler violence", with Britain targeting six entities and one individual. This article never mentions violence or who was actually sanctioned.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “foreign sanctions levied on Judea and Samaria communities”

    Why this matters
    The Post again describes the sanctions as aimed at "communities".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the sanctions target places and the people who live there for who they are.
    The context
    By the Post's own earlier account, the sanctions target specific networks accused of settler violence, not communities.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    In June, the UK and five other countries sanctioned networks accused of financing and carrying out settler violence, with Britain targeting six entities and one individual. Ganz called those sanctions disgraceful.

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Written in collaboration with Binyamin Regional”

    Why this matters
    Only at the very end does the Post say the report was written with the council Ganz heads.
    The impression it gives
    Until the last line, a reader takes this as independent reporting, in which Ganz is the only voice and every claim about the sanctions is his.
    The context
    No one sanctioned, no British voice and no Palestinian voice appears. The piece was co-written by the subject's own council.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“head of both the Yesha Council”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 8 NovForeign nationals face possible deportation after arrest in West Bank alongside Palestinians6.0
  2. 8 NovSecurity officer detained after being filmed pointing gun at settlers near West Bank's Jericho6.0
  3. 7 NovIDF admits West Bank commander met settler official, denies secret coordination of Jericho outpost8.8
  4. 7 NovNahala settlers to be removed from unauthorized outpost near Gaza border0.0
  5. 6 NovBorder Police arrest Palestinian disguised as haredi Jew while attempting to enter Israel illegally3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post