The Sun, on UK Politics, 3 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Travellers WIN right to stay on site after flattening and paving over woodland

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

4 comments 4 Next TRAVELLERS who flattened and paved over a woodland have won their right to stay on site . Local residents have been left “devastated” at the decision after the travellers pitched up near St Albans in Hertfordshire four years ago. 6 Travellers who flattened and paved over a woodland have won their right to stay on the site indefinitely Source: PHIL HARRIS 6 Local residents have been left ‘devastated’ by the decision after the travellers pitched up four years ago Source: PHIL HARRIS Advertisement In 2024, the Planning Inspectorate granted the travellers temporary permission to remain on the site for five years, two years after they arrived, reports Daily Mail .

They set up camp after felling trees and clearing hedgerows directly adjacent to the gardens of picturesque Bridgefoot Cottages which are 200-years-old. Sign up for The Sun newsletter Thank you! Email address Please provide a valid email. Your info will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy You'll now receive top stories, breaking news, and more, straight to your email. A year after they were given permission – which stipulated the woodland had to be restored by 2029 – they paved over the site and brought in a static caravan.

But despite furious locals saying the area was used as a “dumping ground” and had breached conditions, Hertsmere Council has said they can take no further action following changes in national policy. Read more News DOG ATTACK Girl, 2, bitten in face by dog at village pub as cops issue CCTV in hunt for man GRIM FIND Mystery as woman found with 'life-changing' injuries in alleyway under bridge 6 The site was given temporary planning permission for five years in 2024 after a mother-of-five argued for a settled base for her family Source: PHIL HARRIS 6 But locals say the site remains locked up and they haven’t seen the family Source: PHIL HARRIS Central to the travellers’ appeal for permission to pitch up on the site was the claim that Theresa Lane, a mother-of-five, needed a settled place for her family to live.

At the planning hearing, it was reportedly argued that an 11-year-old child with Down’s Syndrome needed to be based near to a specialist school. Advertisement with four more sons, three of whom were adults. Only Ms Lane and her family were permitted to live on the site but the family have not been spotted since that hearing two years ago. Most read in The Sun AN EXCLUSIVE PAIR Meet Jake Tapper's wife Jennifer Brown and their children MARKLE PROBE Cops probing Thomas Markle 'find explicit content on his digital devices' KNIFE HORROR Third boy, 16, held over 'attempted murder' after 5 stabbed at Halloween party RAPE PROBE Two men arrested over 'rape & attempted rape' of 2 women in UK seaside town Instead, residents have claimed the site remains locked up and only report seeing men who they believe are “caretakers” of the plot.

Upon their arrival in 2022, locals reported being approached in their own garden by men working at the site with some saying they were verbally abused. Meanwhile, neighbouring properties said their water bills quadrupled with mounting water usage after the travellers arrived. Advertisement They believed the travellers had hooked themselves to the water mains shared by the surrounding properties. And pipes prepared for potential septic tanks were also spotted, despite the fact they were only permitted to a single mobile home and touring caravan.

In a letter sent to residents this week, Hertsmere Council reportedly said the case would be closed after the government weakened planning rules. 6 Local residents said the site had been used as a ‘dumping ground’ Source: PHIL HARRIS 6 But the local council reportedly said they could take no further action after changes to national policy Source: PHIL HARRIS Advertisement The enforcement officer said it was “unlikely that conditions restriction permission to temporary or personal planning permissions would meet the condition tests”.

This is because of “changes to national policy” ” which mean “the need to restrict this development to being a personal and temporary permission is no longer required”. Locals have been left furious at the decision, with one saying it was “devastating news “. Another said it had been “upsetting for all of us” and blasted trying to fight the alleged planning breaches as “an absolute waste of my time”.

Advertisement The travellers have also submitted a new application for two touring caravans and two static homes . The site – which had previously been purchased by Ms Lane’s brother in 2021 for £39,000 – had been green-belt land for the last 45 years with the council previously having dismissed past development attempts. An spokesperson for the Department for Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “Local planning authorities have a wide range of enforcement powers with strong penalties for non-compliance.

RECOMMENDED STORIES “It is for local authorities to determine what action they take against any breaches of planning control, and there are strong protections in place to protect green spaces for local people.” Advertisement 4 comments 4

Read the original article on thesun.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Sun tells readers that a Traveller family won the right to stay because a mother said she needed a settled base for her children. Its own body shows the council dropped enforcement because national planning policy changed. It then prints a neighbour's insinuation that the family used a disabled child to sway the hearing, with no evidence and no reply from the family, who are never heard from.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “as ‘mum needs settled base for 5 kids’”

    Why this matters
    The headline joins the win to the words ‘mum needs settled base for 5 kids’ with "as". It puts them in quotation marks although nobody in the article says them.
    The impression it gives
    The family won the right to stay this week because of the mother's plea, and the quoted words are something she or a ruling said.
    The context
    The mother's argument was made at the 2024 hearing that granted temporary, personal permission. The current outcome is the council closing its enforcement case after the government changed national planning policy. The quoted phrase is The Sun's own paraphrase.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Council says it cannot enforce limits on Traveller site after national planning policy change.

  2. Pins the decision on the wrong cause

    Minor

    “after a mother claimed she needed a settled base for her five children”

    Why this matters
    The lead says the travellers "have won their right to stay" after the mother's claim. It presents her plea as the reason for the outcome being reported.
    The impression it gives
    A mother's claim about her children is what secured the family's permanent stay.
    The context
    The Sun's own later sentences say the council can take no further action because national policy changed. That change removed the need for a personal and temporary permission. The mother's claim belonged to the earlier, temporary 2024 permission.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“can take no further action following changes in national policy”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the need to restrict this development to being a personal and temporary permission is no longer required”

    Show it in the article

  3. Smears a named person

    Minor

    “One even doubted the child who attended the hearing, saying the travellers would “produce the girl again” should another hearing be required.”

    Why this matters
    The Sun prints a neighbour's suggestion that the family would "produce the girl again", meaning a disabled child was brought out as a prop. It introduces the remark with "even" and sets nothing against it.
    The impression it gives
    Theresa Lane's family may have deceived the planning hearing by parading a child.
    The context
    The article offers nothing to support this. The Planning Inspectorate accepted the case about the child's needs. The Sun records no attempt to put the claim to Ms Lane or the family.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“needed to be based near to a specialist school”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the Planning Inspectorate granted the travellers temporary permission”

    Show it in the article

    “Ms Lane is also said to have claimed she was a widow”

    Why this matters
    "Is also said to have claimed" turns evidence given at a hearing into a doubtful claim. It stacks it after the child's needs.
    The impression it gives
    Ms Lane's account of her own family is suspect.
    The context
    The article reports nothing that contradicts what Ms Lane told the hearing. The doubt comes only from the wording.

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “The Sun has contacted Hertsmere Borough Council for comment.”

    Why this matters
    The only approach for comment The Sun records is to the council. Residents, the council's letter and a government spokesperson fill the piece.
    The impression it gives
    There is no other side to the dispute worth hearing.
    The context
    Ms Lane and the Traveller family, the people whose home, honesty and child are discussed, are never quoted. The article says nothing of any attempt to reach them.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Sun

  1. 3 NovLabour’s £10bn migrant U-turn WILL hike already soaring welfare bill, admits Mahmood8.2
  2. 3 NovEmployers ARE ‘working people’, insists John Healey after backlash at treasury minister’s comments0.0
  3. 3 NovAndy Burnham to discuss ‘formal apology’ to countries affected by Britain’s role in slavery during his Caribbean trip0.0
  4. 2 NovLabour COLLAPSES power-sharing with Greens in 11 councils over controversial ‘Zionism is racism’ policy0.0
  5. 2 NovOver 800,000 low income families will miss out on £100 energy payment – find out if you’ll get the boost3.0

Everything we scored from The Sun