MSNBC, on Iran, 6 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Trump is rapidly losing control over his war with Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The historic Republican losses in the midterm elections have left President Donald Trump with even fewer options for ending the war with Iran quickly, experts say. But U.S. airstrikes are unlikely to make the capitulate, and the country’s leaders are likely to stand by expansive demands they have made in negotiations. “Iran has been very unwilling to have any reasonable discussions about peace,” said Leslie Shedd, a nonresident fellow at the Atlantic Council and a former senior aide to Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas.

Trump could launch U.S. airstrikes against Iran but the government there has already absorbed thousands of such strikes. In the unlikely scenario that Trump takes the extraordinary step of dropping a tactical nuclear weapon on a nuclear storage site beneath Pickaxe Mountain, it would not eliminate Iran’s nuclear program, which is deeply buried and also spans the country, experts said. The first attack since Nagasaki with a nuclear weapon of any size would create long-lasting radioactive fallout and threaten to destabilize existing weapons agreements among nuclear powers.

With Democrats winning more seats in Congress and Republicans showing increasing skepticism in the Iran war, lawmakers returning to Washington next week could insist on a war powers resolution or cut funding. Other options for Trump — a U.S. bombing campaign, a reduction in U.S. forces in the region and a unilateral declaration of victory — will not change the strategic reality. Iran has shown that the U.S. cannot stop it from intermittently shutting down the Strait of Hormuz and driving up global energy prices.

“Conscience or the cost of living, Americans said NO TO WAR, and ‌we endorse this message,” Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf posted Wednesday on X in response to the midterms election results, according to Reuters. said Alexander Vindman, a former Trump National Security Council official who served as a witness against Trump in his first impeachment.

“They want to inflict sufficient pain to ensure that the U.S. and Israel don’t do this again.” “Even if Pickaxe Mountain were completely neutralized, Tehran does not depend on a single underground facility,” Robert Pape, a professor of political science at the University of Chicago and international security expert, wrote on Substack. “Iran relies on a widespread network of hardened, underground, and deeply fortified technical facilities.

This highly dispersed infrastructure is intentionally designed to withstand foreign surveillance and protect critical assets from potential precision strikes,” Pape wrote. Iranian officials are also likely to see the scale of Trump’s defeat in the midterms as a validation of core strategy against the U.S.: inflicting economic pain by driving up energy prices. “Iran’s strategy has been built explicitly around the idea of imposing economic costs — which then translate into political costs — such that the U.S. is forced to de-escalate and deterred from attacking again in the future,” Gregory Brew, a senior Iran and oil analyst for the International Crisis Group, wrote on X. “They can — they believe — absorb costs more successfully than a U.S. president answerable to voters,” he added.

“Tuesday provided evidence that this strategy, broadly speaking, has been successful.” In one success for Trump, a U.S. Naval blockade of Iranian ships trying to enter or exit the Strait of Hormuz has placed intense economic pressure on . But Iranian officials are likely calculating that Congress will pass a war powers resolution to curtail Trump’s war or cut funding for the U.S. military effort in the Gulf. Diplomats from Persian Gulf countries continue to mediate talks between Washington and Tehran.

The economic pain those countries experience remains far greater than that of Americans. Iranian officials sent the U.S. a proposal regarding its nuclear program this week, Reuters reported. But Trump is likely to demand the complete dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program in any talks as a way to cement his own legacy. Iran has resisted that demand for decades. A final option for Trump — a bombing campaign and a declaration of victory — will not change the strategic reality that has emerged in the nine months since the war began.

“The Iranians are still going to control the Strait of Hormuz. They can hit targets at will,” said Vindman, who is also a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel. “There is no easy way out of this.”

Read the original article on ms.now (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

MSNBC reports that Trump would consider resuming strikes on Iran after the midterms. It never mentions its own report days earlier, citing U.S. officials via The Wall Street Journal, that the U.S. attacked Iran's Qeshm Island on Monday in a series of secret limited strikes. It also calls Iran's government a regime twice in its own voice, and lets U.S. analysts describe Iran's intentions while Iran's only voice is one post from its parliament speaker.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “Trump has said he would consider resuming strikes against Iran after the midterms.”

    Why this matters
    The words "resuming strikes" present U.S. attacks on Iran as something that stopped and might start again after the vote.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the U.S. has not been striking Iran in the run-up to the midterms and that any new strike would be a future decision.
    The context
    Three days earlier MSNBC itself reported, citing The Wall Street Journal and U.S. officials, that the U.S. attacked Iran's Qeshm Island on Monday in the latest of a series of limited strikes carried out secretly in recent weeks. The article never mentions these strikes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Trump has said he would consider resuming strikes against Iran after the midterms, though U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal that the U.S. attacked Iran's Qeshm Island on Monday, the latest in a series of limited strikes carried out secretly in recent weeks.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iranian regime”

    Why this matters
    MSNBC calls Iran's government "the Iranian regime" in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the outlet's verdict that Iran's government is an illegitimate regime as a neutral description.
    The context
    The word is a verdict, not a fact reported in the article. The same paragraph and others use "the government there" and "the country’s leaders" without loss of meaning.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the government there has already absorbed thousands”

    Show it in the article

    “Iran’s regime and economy”

    Why this matters
    MSNBC repeats "regime" in its own voice when describing the effect of the U.S. naval blockade.
    The impression it gives
    A reader again absorbs the outlet's own label for Iran's government as plain description, this time framed as a "success for Trump".
    The context
    Nothing in the article supports the label; it is the outlet's choice of word, used twice in narration.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the government there has already absorbed thousands”

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    ““The fundamental issue is that the Iranians have no interest in coming to a peaceful resolution,””

    Why this matters
    MSNBC gives a former U.S. official repeated space to characterise Iranian intentions, after opening with a former Republican aide saying the same.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away with U.S. analysts' account of what Iran wants as the settled view of the talks.
    The context
    The only Iranian voice is one social media post from Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf about the midterm result. No Iranian official's account of the negotiations or of the proposal Iran sent this week appears.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Americans said NO TO WAR”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Iranian officials sent the U.S. a proposal”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from MSNBC

  1. 4 NovVance says Republicans lost control of Congress because of Iran war3.0
  2. 4 NovThree places where Trump’s post-election foreign policy could ramp up0.0
  3. 3 Nov8 months into the war with Iran, Trump remains ignorant about U.S. fatalities and costs0.0
  4. 30 OctTrump plans to resume strikes on Iran day after midterm elections3.0
  5. 28 OctEight months into the conflict, the U.S. war with Iran gets a revised price tag3.0

Everything we scored from MSNBC