Ynet News (English), on Gaza, 3 October 2026

Ynet reports an Israeli strike that killed five people, four of them women, then gives most of the article to a biography of the man Israel was aiming at, leaving the dead as a bare number with no names and nothing about the scale of Israel's killing in Gaza. In its own voice it calls Hamas a "terrorist organization" and the more than 1,000 prisoners freed in 2011 "terrorists", and it states an unsourced claim about a 1 billion shekel transfer as plain fact. It also strips Israel out of earlier killings its own reporter had attributed to an Israeli strike.

9.4

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “more than 1,000 other terrorists”

    What the words do
    Ynet labels every one of the 1,000-plus Palestinian prisoners released in the 2011 exchange a terrorist, in its own voice, with no charge, conviction or source given for any of them.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That a thousand convicted terrorists were set free, so Israel's imprisonment of all of them was justified.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no basis for the label beyond the Israeli state's own position on the prisoners it had held; it names no offence for anyone other than al-Amoudi himself.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“He was arrested by Israel in 2004”

    Show it in the article

    “the terrorist organization’s activities”

    What the words do
    Ynet applies the word terrorist to Hamas in its own voice, outside quotation marks, as it describes the money the man targeted is said to have moved.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That terrorist is the neutral, established description, not one party's designation.
    What is actually the case
    The same designation appears in the coverage only inside the Israeli military's own statement, where it is attributed to the army.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “his activity within the terrorist organization”

    What the words do
    Ynet repeats the label a second time as a plain descriptor of the body al-Amoudi belongs to, so the verdict is carried in the outlet's own voice through the biography.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That everything al-Amoudi did, including heading a media department, was terrorist activity by definition.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself says he is a political and media official and not a military commander, which it never squares with the label it applies.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“al-Amoudi is not identified as a commander of Hamas’ military wing”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    He was released in 2011 in the Gilad Shalit exchange, along with Yahya Sinwar and more than 1,000 other Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.

  2. Writes Palestinians out of their own story

    Serious

    “the IDF’s campaign targeting senior Hamas officials”

    What the words do
    Ynet describes the strike as part of a campaign against senior officials, two sentences after reporting that the people it actually killed were four women and one other person.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That these strikes hit the leaders they aim at and that the dead in this one are outside the story.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own facts say the man targeted may not have been hit at all, while five other people were killed; the coverage records that the Israeli military acknowledged the results were still under review.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    An Israeli strike on a residential building in western Gaza City before dawn killed five people, four of them women. The Israeli military said it was targeting Hamas official Ali al-Amoudi and that the results of the strike were still being reviewed.

  3. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “killed in a strike on an apartment in Gaza City”

    What the words do
    Ynet removes Israel from the sentence about the killing of Izz al-Din Bik, leaving a strike with nobody firing it.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the man died in an unattributed explosion.
    What is actually the case
    Ynet's own report four days earlier said he was killed in an Israeli strike on an apartment in Gaza City.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “was also killed”

    What the words do
    Ynet reports a second killing with no actor, no weapon and no place, stripping the sentence of everything except the fact that the man is dead.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Mohammed Abu Alwan simply died, without an Israeli strike behind it.
    What is actually the case
    The article presents this killing as part of the series it elsewhere calls the Israeli military's campaign, so Ynet has the actor and leaves it out of the sentence.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a continuation of the IDF’s campaign targeting senior Hamas officials”

    Show it in the article

    “following the killing of much of the organization’s senior leadership”

    What the words do
    Ynet writes a mass of killings with no one doing the killing, in its closing sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the leadership deaths happened as an impersonal consequence of war.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself attributes the series of killings to the Israeli military's campaign.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the IDF’s campaign targeting senior Hamas officials in recent weeks”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The most recent senior figure Israel killed was Hamas' commander in northern Gaza, Izz al-Din Bik, killed in an Israeli strike on an apartment in Gaza City on Tuesday. Israel also killed Mohammed Abu Alwan, the head of Hamas' finance department, on Wednesday of the previous week.

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “he managed to transfer more than 1 billion shekels”

    What the words do
    Ynet states a precise financial figure about a dead man in its own voice, with no source named anywhere in the article.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the transfer is an established fact on the record.
    What is actually the case
    The article attributes nothing in this sentence; every other claim about Hamas figures in the piece is sourced to Arab media, reports or named outlets, and none of the coverage of this strike carries the figure.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to reports, he assumed responsibility”

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    “If the reports are accurate”

    What the words do
    Ynet hangs the whole account on unnamed Arab media and casts doubt on whether the strike happened as described.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That Israeli responsibility for this strike rests on foreign reports that may be wrong.
    What is actually the case
    The Israeli military itself confirmed carrying out the strike on al-Amoudi the same day, and said it hit an apartment inside a residential building. Ynet never tells its readers the army confirmed it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The building Israel struck was a residential building, according to the Israeli military's own statement. Ynet calls it only "a building in western Gaza City", so a reader does not learn that four women were killed in the homes they were living in.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel targets senior Hamas official seen as Yahya Sinwar’s successor in Gaza City strike

Arab media outlets reported Saturday morning that the IDF attempted to kill Ali al-Amoudi, considered one of Hamas’ most senior officials in the Gaza Strip and widely seen as the Gaza “successor” to Yahya Sinwar, the architect of the October 7 massacre who was killed during the war. Al-Amoudi does not formally hold the title of Hamas leader in Gaza but is running for the position in the group’s internal elections. Palestinians reported earlier Saturday morning that five people, including four women, were killed when the Israeli Air Force struck a building in western Gaza City before dawn. According to the reports, rescue crews evacuated the dead and additional wounded people to hospitals and continued searching for more casualties trapped beneath the rubble. , the strike would mark a continuation of in recent weeks. The most recent senior figure killed was Hamas’ commander in northern Gaza, Izz al-Din Bik, who was on Tuesday. On Wednesday of the previous week, Mohammed Abu Alwan, the head of Hamas’ finance department, . During the war, to finance in Gaza. A week and a half earlier, Hamas’ Rafah Brigade commander, Nael Abu Obeid, was killed in a drone strike. Al-Amoudi is a member of Hamas’ political bureau and a former prisoner who headed the organization’s information and media department before the war. Over the past year, he has become one of the central figures managing Hamas affairs in the Gaza Strip. He is now running against Nizar Awadallah for the leadership of the movement’s political bureau in Gaza. Al-Amoudi was born in the Gaza Strip and lives in Khan Younis. He was arrested by Israel in 2004 and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was released in 2011 as part of the Gilad Shalit prisoner exchange, along with Yahya Sinwar and . His ties to Sinwar are considered one of the defining features of . The two met during their years in Israeli prisons and remained close after their release. During Sinwar’s first term as head of Hamas’ political bureau in Gaza, from 2017 to 2021, al-Amoudi served as the director of his office. In 2021, al-Amoudi was elected to Hamas’ political bureau and was appointed that same year to head the movement’s information department. In that role, he was involved in shaping Hamas’ communications and messaging strategy and coordinating between the organization’s political leadership and its operational apparatuses. Following Sinwar’s killing in October 2024 and the deaths of a series of other senior Hamas leaders in Gaza during the war, al-Amoudi’s standing grew. According to reports, he assumed responsibility for managing the affairs of Hamas’ political bureau in Gaza and became a central figure in running the organization on the ground. During this period, his name was linked to a series of organizational changes and appointments within Hamas’ Gaza apparatus. Some of those moves reportedly sparked disagreements among senior members of the organization, with questions also raised within Hamas over how he had acquired his authority. Al-Amoudi is now competing with Nizar Awadallah for Hamas’ top position in the Gaza Strip. The first round produced no decisive result and the final round was suspended after Awadallah filed an appeal over aspects of the process. According to sources cited by Al Arabiya and Al Hadath, Khaled Mashaal and Zaher Jabarin support Awadallah, while al-Amoudi has the backing of Khalil al-Hayya, head of Hamas’ political bureau. However, Asharq Al-Awsat reported that it was not known with certainty whether al-Hayya supports either candidate. Despite his longstanding ties to Sinwar and his involvement in managing Hamas in Gaza, al-Amoudi is not identified as a commander of Hamas’ military wing. He is a senior political and organizational official whose influence has grown significantly during the war.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 122 outlets covered this story