Press TV, on Iran, 27 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Oman’s Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi has called for the formation of a non-aggression security pact involving six Persian Gulf states plus Iran and Iraq, slamming US attempts to demonize the Islamic Republic as a threat. Speaking at Girton College, Cambridge, on Monday, Albusaidi stressed that Washington has promoted for almost half a century the false image of Tehran as a threat to the Persian Gulf states, holding back West Asia's ability to solve its own problems.

The Omani foreign minister, speaking to break the deadlock over the region’s future, stressed that the US would no longer be the region's primary security provider. “Issues such as the Strait of Hormuz have become impossible to resolve because external powers continue to define the terms of engagement, while regional powers are unable to take collective responsibility for making their own security arrangements and reach a consensus on them,” Albusaidi noted.

Iran has so far refused to ease its restrictions on transit through the strategic Strait of Hormuz, saying the key international energy waterway will be fully reopened once the US permanently ends its aggression and lifts its maritime blockade and sanctions against Iran. Iranian authorities have also indicated that the country would not back down from its conditions and would respond decisively to any new act of aggression against its territory.

“What holds us back is that issues which ought to be handled at a regional level by the states of the [Persian] Gulf themselves, are made more complex, more intractable and sometimes simply impossible to resolve because the region’s security arrangements are insufficiently developed,” Albusaidi further stressed. “And they are insufficiently developed because they have relied for too long on the involvement of external powers,” he added.

Oman’s top diplomat noted that the Islamic Republic “had been systematically excluded from playing any meaningful role in the security arrangements of the region. Albusaidi also stressed that such exclusion had led to “profoundly negative consequences, not just for Iran, but for the region as a whole”, including the imposition of priorities on the region by external powers such as “the entirely false perception that there is a fundamental regional antagonism between Iran and the Arab states of the [Persian] Gulf.”

According to the Omani foreign minister, the most “damaging” of the priorities imposed on the Persian Gulf region from the outside has been the requirement that the Islamic Republic be excluded. “Not just excluded. Worse. Positioned as the threat against which regional security had to be organized,” Albusaidi stressed, speaking on the day high-level defense and intelligence officials from Turkey, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia gathered in Tehran .

Iran and Oman, both coastal states bordering the strategic waterway, engaged in intensive negotiations for months over arrangements for safe shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran and Oman finally reached a temporary agreement on how shipping traffic should be managed in the strait, but the plan is on hold . Roughly one-fifth of global oil demand passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making the waterway one of the world's most strategically important maritime chokepoints.

Oman’s foreign minister, without mentioning by name, also challenged by saying that he believed the previous round of Oman-mediated negotiations between the US and Iran in February were “making significant progress, and that an agreement was within reach. We still stand by that judgment today.” The US and waged their first war of aggression against Iran, which lasted 12 days, in June 2025.

Their second aggression began on February 28, 2026, and came to a halt in early April after 40 days. with missile strikes and drone attacks.

Read the original article on presstv.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Press TV attributes the Omani foreign minister's own words to him. In its own narration, though, it calls US actions against Iran 'aggression' and Iran's strikes on US bases and energy infrastructure in Gulf states 'defending itself', and it drops the attribution it gives elsewhere, so the reader takes Iran's framing as established fact. It also calls Israel's government 'the Israeli regime' in its own voice.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “in an attempt to prevent a renewed act of aggression by the US against Iran”

    Why this matters
    Press TV describes the purpose of the Tehran meeting in its own voice and calls a possible US strike 'a renewed act of aggression'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as settled that any US action is aggression and that the Turkish, Pakistani and Saudi officials met for exactly that purpose.
    The context
    Nobody is quoted giving this purpose for the meeting, and the label 'aggression' is Iran's position, which the article elsewhere attributes to Iran ('saying the key international energy waterway will be fully reopened once the US permanently ends its aggression').

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“once the US permanently ends its aggression”

    Show it in the article

    “as Iran keeps the waterway closed due to US acts of aggression and violations”

    Why this matters
    Press TV gives Iran's reason for keeping the strait closed as plain fact, with 'acts of aggression and violations' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the closure is caused by established US violations, not that this is Iran's stated justification.
    The context
    Two sentences earlier the article treats the same point as Iran's position, introducing it with 'saying'. Here the attribution is dropped and the violations are never specified.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iran has so far refused to ease its restrictions”

    Show it in the article

    “US President Donald Trump’s case for a further war of aggression against Iran”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls a prospective US war 'a further war of aggression' in its own words, while reporting what Albusaidi said.
    The impression it gives
    The reader may think the Omani minister called it a war of aggression, or that this is an agreed description.
    The context
    Albusaidi's quoted words say only that the February negotiations 'were making significant progress'. The phrase 'war of aggression' is the outlet's own label, not his.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“We still stand by that judgment today.”

    Show it in the article

    “Iran has been defending itself by targeting US bases and energy infrastructure in the Persian Gulf states”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Iranian missile and drone strikes, including on energy infrastructure inside third countries, 'defending itself', with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as fact that every Iranian strike, including on Gulf states' energy sites, is lawful self-defence.
    The context
    This is Iran's characterisation. The article gives no source for it and no response from the Gulf states whose infrastructure was hit, the same states the minister is urging into a pact with Iran.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“non-aggression security pact involving six Persian Gulf states”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran says it will keep the strait closed until the US ends what Tehran calls its aggression and lifts the blockade and sanctions. Iran has struck US bases and energy infrastructure in Gulf states with missiles and drones, which it describes as self-defence.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Israeli regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Israel's government 'the Israeli regime' in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader gets a verdict on the Israeli state delivered as neutral description.
    The context
    This is the outlet's own label, not a quoted speaker's. The same habit appears in its earlier reporting ('Tehran called for the Israeli regime to be expelled').

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 27 OctNo talks with US before Iran’s conditions are met: Senior lawmaker6.0
  2. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  3. 26 OctTehran quadrilateral meeting fruit of Iranian nation’s resistance and Armed Forces’ valor: Bagheri Kani7.3
  4. 26 OctLeader outlines roadmap for an ‘ever-stronger Iran,’ urges elites to break scientific boundaries0.0
  5. 26 OctIran, Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia hold security meeting in Tehran6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV