Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 28 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Trump: The war in Iran will end when I want it to

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

US President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he would not hesitate to launch military strikes against Iran again if presented with the same circumstances, describing the decision to attack the Islamic Republic as one of the most important achievements of his presidency. Speaking at an election campaign rally at the Port of Corpus Christi in Texas, Trump also asserted that he would determine when the conflict ends, emphasizing that any conclusion must guarantee that Iran will never acquire nuclear weapons.

“Somebody asked me yesterday, it’s very interesting, ‘If you had to do it again, would you have attacked Iran?’ I said absolutely," Trump told supporters. “It’s one of the greatest things I ever did," he added. The President also addressed the economic consequences of the war, predicting that gasoline prices would soon decline significantly. Trump characterized the current financial burden on Americans as “short-term pain" that would ultimately give way to longer-term economic benefits.

“You’re going to see very soon, ‘What the hell happened to gasoline? It’s so cheap,’" he said. Asked about the timeline for ending the military confrontation, Trump maintained that the decision rested with him and reiterated that preventing a nuclear-armed Iran remained his overriding objective. "Somebody asked me before, when will the war in Iran end? I said, whenever I want it to end. It'll be very quick, but we have to have it end properly, with total and complete - a total statement, they will never have a nuclear weapon.

Number one state sponsor [of terrorism]. They will never have a nuclear weapon." Trump's latest remarks came amid speculation that Washington could resume strikes against Iran either before or after next Tuesday's midterm elections. The President has made the military campaign against Tehran a recurring subject at his election rallies in recent days, defending the operation as necessary to protect American security. During a rally in Mississippi on Monday, Trump argued that Iran's development of increasingly sophisticated missiles, combined with its nuclear ambitions, had made American military intervention unavoidable.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article repeats Trump's demand that Iran 'will never have a nuclear weapon' and his talk of its 'nuclear ambitions', but never gives Iran's stated position. Iran has said repeatedly that it would never develop nuclear weapons, including in the Obama-era agreement. Without it, a reader takes a weapons drive as an established fact rather than Trump's claim.

How we know

He acknowledged the technological capabilities of Iranian weapons manufacturers but emphasized the damage American forces had inflicted on the country's military. "Iranians make great weapons. They are very smart people, but we beat the s--t out of them," the President stated, adding, "Iranians now have a missile that essentially reached Europe. They weren’t supposed to. We said, 'Where the hell did they get that?'" Trump warned that Iran's missile capabilities could eventually threaten American cities, specifically mentioning San Diego and Los Angeles.

"And they'd hit our cities. They’d hit San Diego. They’d hit Los Angeles. They'd hit our cities too. So somebody had to do it. It had to be done," Trump stated. He also . “We didn’t start the war with Iran. ," he added. The President went on to criticize an earlier ceasefire agreement, arguing that the pause in fighting had accomplished little and that he had been skeptical of it from the outset.

"We did a little ceasefire, which I never liked very much. I considered it a waste of time. The ceasefire was just a waste of time, but you like to listen to professionals. We wanted to be nice, but it was just a waste of time as far as I'm concerned," he continued. Trump had also addressed the possibility of additional military action during an exchange with reporters on Saturday, when he declined to disclose whether another strike was imminent.

While acknowledging that renewed attacks remained under consideration, he stressed that a diplomatic agreement with Iran was still possible. "Let me tell you, while we're thinking about doing it, and maybe tomorrow, do you really think I'm going to tell you? If I'm going to do it, and there's a possibility I will, there's also a possibility we'll have a nice, big, beautiful agreement. They want to make a deal. But the problem is, will they hold the deal?"

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva relays Trump's rally remarks on Iran, mostly with clear attribution. It lets his claim that Iran started the war close a passage unchallenged, though other outlets report a US-Israeli war on Iran that began on 28 February and the article itself quotes Trump defending his decision to attack. Iran's own stated position on nuclear weapons never appears.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “rejected the suggestion that Washington bore responsibility for initiating the confrontation”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls the US role in starting the war 'the suggestion', as if it were an open question.
    The impression it gives
    That who started the war is a matter of competing claims, and Trump is rebutting an accusation.
    The context
    The war began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran on 28 February. Trump himself says in this article that he chose to attack Iran.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Iran started the war with us”

    Why this matters
    Trump's claim closes the passage with nothing set against it.
    The impression it gives
    That Iran began the war and the US only responded.
    The context
    Earlier in the same article, Trump answers 'absolutely' when asked whether he would attack Iran again. Other outlets report the war as a US-Israeli war on Iran that began on 28 February. The outlet sets neither fact against his claim.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Trump claimed Iran started the war. The war in fact began on 28 February with US and Israeli strikes on Iran, and Trump himself said at the rally that he had decided to attack Iran.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article repeats Trump's demand that Iran 'will never have a nuclear weapon' and his talk of its 'nuclear ambitions', but never gives Iran's stated position. Iran has said repeatedly that it would never develop nuclear weapons, including in the Obama-era agreement. Without it, a reader takes a weapons drive as an established fact rather than Trump's claim.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 28 OctReport: US tells Gulf allies to prepare for Iran strikes after midterms3.0
  2. 27 OctTrump on Iran war: We had no choice, we didn’t start the war6.0
  3. 26 OctSaudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan hold high-level talks with Iran3.0
  4. 26 OctReport: Hezbollah rebuilding military capabilities with Iranian funding8.7
  5. 26 OctKatz: Israel never planned pre-election strike on Iran8.2

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News