The Jerusalem Post, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Board of Deputies passes motion declaring Green Party a 'racist party'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD) has passed a motion declaring the UK Green Party a racist party.

This resolution, adopted at the board's October Plenary Meeting, condemns the Green Party's decision to adopt , deeming the policy racist and antisemitic. The board will now treat the Greens as it has treated other “racist parties.”“Today, representatives of Jewish communities across Britain have delivered a clear verdict,” BoD president Phil Rosenberg said.“By adopting an antisemitic platform, the Green Party of England and Wales has become a racist party.

We will treat it accordingly.”“No political party has the right to tell Jews that a central part of our identity, rooted in thousands of years of history, faith and peoplehood, is racist,” he said.“The Green Party's policy brands much of our community, including our synagogues and communal organizations, with that slur. It gives prejudice against Jews a political license.” and “confronting the antisemitism it has legitimized.”He also noted that the BoD recognizes and commends those within the party who opposed the motion, including Jewish members whose warnings were disregarded.

Rosenberg said these individuals deserved to be heard and supported.Motion proposer Ashley Hirst said he was proud that British Jews have “said clearly” that a party which declares that this is racist “is itself a racist party.”“The board will give effect to the resolution in its dealings with the Green Party of England and Wales and continue to challenge antisemitism wherever it appears in political and public life.”Green Party became first in Europe to declare itself anti-ZionistThe Green Party became the first mainstream party in Europe to declare itself openly anti-Zionist after voting in the controversial “Zionism is racism” motion at its party conference in Brighton, UK, at the start of the month.

The motion recognizes Zionism as Israel's foundational ideology that has created and maintains an “apartheid regime” between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea.It further affirms the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and liberation. It supports the establishment of a “single democratic Palestinian state in all of historic Palestine, with Jerusalem as its capital.”

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The Post never reports that the Green Party rejected the Board's declaration, or that its spokesman said the Greens do not discriminate against people who identify as Zionists. Without this, a reader believes the Board's charge of racism and antisemitism stands unanswered by the party it targets.

How we know

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post reports the Board of Deputies' motion declaring the Green Party racist and keeps the charge attributed to the Board in its headline and body. It fills almost every sentence with the Board's case and never reports that the Green Party rejected the Board's condemnation, a response other outlets carried about the same event. In its own voice it also calls the Green motion a policy 'branding' Zionism as racism.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Rosenberg said the Green Party's leadership must now take responsibility for reversing this policy”

    Why this matters
    The Post gives Phil Rosenberg's demand that the Green leadership reverse the policy and confront the antisemitism he says it legitimised. No Green voice follows it or appears anywhere else in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the Green Party has nothing to say to the Board's charge that it is a racist party.
    The context
    The Green Party answered the Board. A party spokesman said the Greens do not discriminate against people who identify as Zionists and rejected the Board's characterisation of the motion and the party. The Post reports only the motion's text for the Greens' side.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a policy branding Zionism as racism”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls the Green motion a policy 'branding' Zionism as racism. The verb 'branding' marks the policy as a smear before the Board's view is reported.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Board's verdict, that the motion is a slur, as the outlet's own description of what the motion does.
    The context
    Later the Post describes the motion more plainly: it recognises Zionism as Israel's foundational ideology and affirms Palestinian self-determination. 'Brands' is the word Rosenberg uses in his quoted attack, and here the Post uses it unattributed.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The motion recognizes Zionism as Israel's foundational ideology”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The Green Party's policy brands much of our community”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Post never reports that the Green Party rejected the Board's declaration, or that its spokesman said the Greens do not discriminate against people who identify as Zionists. Without this, a reader believes the Board's charge of racism and antisemitism stands unanswered by the party it targets.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “passes motion declaring Green Party a 'racist party'”

    The headline keeps the verdict as the Board's motion and puts 'racist party' in quotation marks, rather than stating it as the outlet's own fact.

  • “It further affirms the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and liberation.”

    The Post reports what the Green motion actually says about Palestinians, rather than describing it only through its critics.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 27 OctTwo men charged in UK with helping Iran over RAF Fairford incident6.0
  2. 26 Oct'Lack of Jews hasn't meant lack of antisemitism,' Expert on Jews in Wales tells 'Post' - interview3.0
  3. 26 OctUK antisemitism watchdog GnasherJew exposes 40 antisemitic healthcare workers in NHS7.3
  4. 26 OctAward-winning producer receives £400,000 payout from BBC over workplace antisemitism claim3.0
  5. 24 OctUK teachers could be barred from wearing pro-Palestine badges amid antisemitism concerns - report3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post