Daily Mail, on Climate, 7 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

as rising prices mean electric cars can now be more expensive to run than petrol models. Many motorists switched to electric vehicles (EVs) on the promise that, as well as improving the environment, they would also be more economical. However, a new report has highlighted that drivers who rely on the public network of Rapid and Ultra-Rapid chargers can find themselves paying up to 24p per mile.

By comparison, . Now motoring groups have warned that Scots in particular are being hit with the highest tariffs because many live in flats and can’t charge their EVs at home. Experts agree the best way for drivers to reduce costs is to charge their cars overnight on a private driveway, using a slow but cheap domestic charger. In Scotland, though, a higher proportion of households, more than half, do not have access to their own driveway so can’t take advantage of low-priced overnight charging.

Last night, campaign group the Alliance of British Drivers said many Scots EV owners felt lied to about the cost of going electric. A spokesman said: ‘We were promised that EVs would deliver cheaper motoring. But that hasn’t turned out to be entirely true. The cost of charging an EV can be greater than running a petrol model ‘Many drivers are facing an EV rip-off and for Scots it’s even worse than for people in other parts of Britain.’

The UK Department for Transport recently published a review into the ‘Cost of Public Electric Vehicle Charging’, which pointed out that, although costs for home charging are relatively cheap, tariffs for high-power public chargers have almost doubled since 2021 . It noted: ‘Drivers who cannot charge at home are reliant on the public network, where prices have increased significantly. ‘And while EV drivers with access to home charging will save considerably versus refuelling an equivalent petrol vehicle, cheaper running costs are no longer a foregone conclusion for those charging on the public network.’

According to the Scottish government’s House Condition Survey, approximately 1.3million households (around 52 per cent of all dwellings) don’t have a private driveway or dedicated parking space on their own plot. As a result, thousands of Scots EV drivers depend on public chargers, so must choose between ‘cheap but slow’, or else ‘quick but very expensive’. Data provided for the Scottish Mail on Sunday by Zapmap, the UK’s leading charge point platform, shows the scale of the problem.

In Scotland, almost all charge points are now operated by private firms after the Scottish Government phased out its state-run and heavily-subsidised ChargePlace Scotland charger network. Overall, there are 13,064 EV chargers currently available to the public. Of these, 9,623 are AC chargers rated as Standard or Standard Plus. Typically found on-street or in residential car parks, these cost 12-16p per mile but take between six and ten hours to provide a full charge.

The remaining 3,441, more than a quarter, are Rapid or Ultra-Rapid DC chargers, which are typically found on A-roads, motorways, petrol stations and at forecourt-style hubs. These can provide a full charge in 10-60 minutes. But at a cost of around 24p per mile, they are far more expensive than refuelling the most popular petrol vehicles. Even after recent increases pushed the price of petrol to 170.5p per litre, a Ford Puma can run at 15p a mile, while a Nissan Qashqai or Kia Sportage can run at 17.6p a mile.

The Department for Transport report explained that the soaring cost of charging was now discouraging people from buying EVs. It said: ‘The cost of charging away from home has risen sharply and is likely to keep rising. That matters for every driver, but especially for people who cannot charge at home and are already facing wider cost-of-living pressures.’ It added: ‘At today’s prices, those charging in public pay on average at least twice the total costs of those who can charge at home...

Public charging prices are now regularly cited as a barrier to EV ownership, in particular for those who cannot access cheaper overnight domestic charging tariffs.’ To make EV ownership cheaper and fairer for people without access to a private driveway, the report recommended the widespread introduction of local on-street charging hubs where people could charge their vehicles near their homes overnight, with a capped tariff equivalent to a cheap domestic rate, allowing them to run an EV for around 8p a mile.

In last month’s Budget, the UK government acknowledged that ‘higher public charging costs risk slamming the brakes’ on EV uptake. Ministers pledged to set up a taskforce to explore ways of implementing the recommendation for lower local tariffs, and also committed to spending £100m from next year on reducing charging costs. Last night Transport Scotland said grants were available to help people without driveways install EV chargers. A spokesperson said: ‘For households without access to a driveway, the Scottish Government funds the Cross-Pavement Charging Grant, which provides grants of up to £3,500 towards eligible cross-pavement charging solutions, such as cable gullies, helping residents access convenient and affordable home charging using domestic electricity supplies.’

The Cross Pavement Charging Grant is available where the relevant local roads authority permits such installations, with decisions on individual applications remaining a matter for local authorities, which are responsible for approving cross-pavement charging arrangements in their area.

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports a Department for Transport review showing that public rapid charging has become expensive, and that Scots without driveways are hit hardest. The headline and opening line repeat a campaign group's 'EV rip-off' line without saying who said it, and drop the condition that the extra cost applies to public rapid chargers. The early per-mile comparison sets the dearest charging against the cheapest petrol, though the body later gives the fuller figures.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Drivers facing 'EV rip-off' as rising prices mean electric cars can now be more expensive to run than petrol models”

    Why this matters
    The headline puts 'EV rip-off' in quotation marks with no speaker, and says electric cars can be dearer to run than petrol without saying this applies only to public rapid charging.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that running an electric car has become a rip-off in general, and that this is an established verdict rather than a campaign group's words.
    The context
    The phrase comes from a spokesman for the Alliance of British Drivers. The Department for Transport review the article relies on says drivers who charge at home save considerably compared with petrol. The higher cost applies to drivers using public rapid chargers.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Many drivers are facing an EV rip-off and for Scots it's even worse”
    • Elsewhere in the article“EV drivers with access to home charging will save considerably versus refuelling an equivalent petrol vehicle”

    Show it in the article

    “Drivers in Scotland are facing an ‘EV rip-off’”

    Why this matters
    The opening line repeats the campaign group's slogan as the outlet's own statement of fact, with the quote unattributed.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Mail has established that Scottish drivers are being ripped off.
    The context
    The words belong to the Alliance of British Drivers, which the article only introduces in S8. The official review describes price rises on public chargers, not a rip-off.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“campaign group the Alliance of British Drivers said”
    • Elsewhere in the article“reliant on the public network, where prices have increased significantly”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “many petrol cars can be run for as little as 15p per mile”

    Why this matters
    The article sets the cheapest petrol figure ('as little as 15p') against the dearest charging figure ('up to 24p') in S3.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes electric cars typically cost far more per mile than petrol cars.
    The context
    The article's own figures show standard public chargers cost 12-16p per mile, about the same as or less than petrol, and popular petrol models such as the Qashqai and Sportage run at 17.6p. The gap applies only to rapid chargers.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“these cost 12-16p per mile”
    • Elsewhere in the article“a Nissan Qashqai or Kia Sportage can run at 17.6p a mile”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “while EV drivers with access to home charging will save considerably versus refuelling an equivalent petrol vehicle”

    The article quotes the official review's finding that home charging still saves money, which keeps the cost problem tied to public charging.

  • “these cost 12-16p per mile but take between six and ten hours to provide a full charge”

    The article gives the cheaper standard charger costs alongside the rapid charger figures, so readers can see the full range.

  • “allowing them to run an EV for around 8p a mile”

    The article reports the review's proposed remedy and what it would cost per mile, not only the problem.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 6 NovLast month was the warmest October EVER recorded globally - as scientists warn the record-breaking El Niño is supercharging the climate crisis3.0
  2. 6 NovBritain braces for autumn SNOW: The polar vortex has weakened and shifted unprecedentedly early - and scientists say it could bring icy weather to the UK3.0
  3. 6 NovRotting algae blights Mick's beach bolthole on Mustique: ALISON BOSHOFF0.0
  4. 6 NovSuper El Niño could push CO2 levels to record highs in 2027 - with devastating consequences, Met Office warns0.0
  5. 5 NovLabour MP savages Burnham's 'hypocritical and pointless' ban on North Sea oil drilling6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail