The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 24 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

IDF, Shin Bet in response to deadly Hamas attack

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

IDF troops, the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency), Border Police officers, and the Judea Regional Brigade forcibly evacuated 2,000 Hebron-area Palestinians and destroyed an unspecified number of structures in the vicinity over the weekend in response to .St.-Sgt. Ron Yonatan Roytman, 23, from Ashkelon, and Sgt. Yuval Shai Svilem, 20, from Hod Hasharon, were killed in the attack, while three others were lightly wounded., and the IDF said no additional terrorists were involved.

The attack took place at Judea Junction, where the two Hamas terrorists traveling in a car opened fire on four soldiers stationed at the junction. IDF sources estimated that the attackers had originally intended to continue past the junction and carry out a larger attack on the heavily trafficked Route 35 but opened fire after realizing they would be unable to proceed past the IDF control.

The forced evacuations from Hebron appear to be different from other recent incidents.Although in early 2025, , .The IDF carried out multiple temporary evacuations at that time and even sent in the Palestinian Authority to fight large and organized terror groups before undertaking the mass evacuation and destroying several structures in those areas.In contrast, this time, the IDF provided little information about the offenses of the 2,000 evacuated Palestinians, other than to say that they were .While during the 2015-2016 stabbing intifada and in earlier years, Hebron had been one of the most violent and unstable areas – and there have been some terror incidents emanating from Hebron over the past three years of war – generally, it has not been one of the leading problem spots.IDF demolishes structures during Hebron operationsIn addition, the IDF said it destroyed illegally built structures that could make security operations harder to carry out.

However, the military was extremely vague about what those operations were and why entire buildings needed to be destroyed to carry them out.Pressed about how many of the 2,000 hamula (“clan”) members have records linking them to terror (or at a minimum, to rock throwing), multiple IDF sources did not appear to have any specific information on the topic.Rather, the operation seemed to be motivated by public statements made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz about clearing or destroying the neighborhood of the two men involved in the terror incident on Friday – apparently a collective punishment measure.First operation of its kind in West BankWhile Israel has placed closures on terror-emanating areas in the past, it has not carried out mass evacuations and building demolitions to such an extent without a specific connection to those being impacted.While the legal basis for these actions was unclear and global criticism was beginning to stream in, in Israel's current atmosphere, leading into Tuesday's elections, it appeared unlikely that any immediate condemnation would have an impact on the operation.

In its vague Friday night statement, the IDF said that it had launched a counterterrorism operation in the Hebron area following Friday morning's deadly Hamas terrorist attack.Security forces are conducting systematic searches for terrorist infrastructure and weapons in the area and questioning dozens of suspects, according to their joint statement.

The operation is focused on the area from which the terrorists operated and is expected to last several days.Residents living within the operational area will be permitted to leave through three designated exit points after undergoing questioning and security checks. Security forces will take anyone who raises suspicion during the screening process for further questioning.Parallel operations were underway in the Jenin and Nablus areas to locate weapons and carry out arrests, alongside the ongoing counterterrorism operation in Hebron, Walla reported on Saturday morning.

Security forces were also operating in Kafr Aqab in east Jerusalem and the West Bank town of Tamun, according to the report.

The operation follows a series of counterterrorism measures carried out since Friday morning, including mapping the terrorists' homes, sealing off the Hebron and Halhul areas, establishing roadblocks, and conducting operations in nearby villages. Security forces are also removing illegal infrastructure that could pose a security threat near the site of the attack.Richard Offenbacher contributed to this report.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israeli forces forced 2,000 Hebron Palestinians from their homes and destroyed buildings, and it says plainly that army sources had no specific information against them and that this looked like collective punishment. It still uses the word evacuate for the removal and calls the attack a Hamas terrorist attack with no source. It also writes the soldiers out of the sentence about the two attackers' deaths and describes the earlier Jenin and Tulkarm removals as answering well-documented terror, unsourced.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Minor

    “forcibly evacuate 2,000 Hebron Palestinians”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the removal of 2,000 people from their homes an evacuation, the army's word for moving people out of danger.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as a protective, if rough, movement of residents for their own safety.
    The context
    The Post's own body says the army had no specific information against these people and calls the operation apparently a collective punishment measure. People driven out as punishment are expelled, not evacuated.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“apparently a collective punishment measure”
    • Elsewhere in the article“without a specific connection to those being impacted”

    Show it in the article

    “Israel cleared areas of Jenin, Tulkarm, and Nur al-Shams in the West Bank, evacuating close to 40,000 Palestinians”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post says Israel cleared areas and evacuated 40,000 Palestinians, words that turn a mass removal of people into housekeeping and rescue.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes 40,000 Palestinians were moved out in an orderly, protective way.
    The context
    The same sentence goes on to say structures were destroyed in those areas. Removing 40,000 people and destroying their buildings is expulsion and displacement, words the article never uses.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “expulsion”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Minor

    “Friday morning's deadly Hamas terrorist attack”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls the shooting a Hamas terrorist attack, with no source for either the Hamas link or the label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that Hamas carried out the attack and that it was terrorism.
    The context
    Other coverage says the two gunmen opened fire on soldiers at a temporary army checkpoint, and the Hamas link rests on the army's assessment. The Post gives the army's verdict as its own.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “familially connected to the Hamas-linked Gaza clan”

    Why this matters
    The Post itself calls the whole clan Hamas-linked, a label that extends to the 2,000 people expelled.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the 2,000 expelled belong to a group that is known to be tied to Hamas.
    The context
    The Times of Israel attributes the Hamas affiliation of the clan to the army's assessment alone. The Post drops that attribution and states it as fact about a whole extended family.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “Two terrorists were killed during the confrontation”

    Why this matters
    The passive were killed during the confrontation takes the soldiers out of the sentence about the two Palestinians' deaths.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with deaths that simply happened in the course of the fight, with no one doing the killing.
    The context
    Ynet reports that a force under the sector's deputy battalion commander killed the two men after a firefight of about 20 minutes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “those areas had experienced well-documented mass terror incidents dating back to early 2022”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post offers well-documented mass terror incidents as the reason the 2025 expulsion of 40,000 people from Jenin, Tulkarm and Nur al-Shams was different.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes that earlier mass expulsion as justified by established facts.
    The context
    The article gives no source for this description; it is the army's justification for the earlier operation, written as settled.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctHospital delays, curfews as Israeli peace groups condemn displacements of Palestinians in Hebron7.3
  2. 25 OctIDF pushing for Hebron attack to be classified as clash between soldiers, terrorists, not terror6.0
  3. 25 OctThree Hebron residents arrested for online incitement to terrorism, support for Hamas6.0
  4. 25 OctIDF evacuates Israeli rioters after fire breaks out near Palestinian West Bank town6.0
  5. 24 OctIDF, Shin Bet launch multi-day counterterrorism operation in Hebron after deadly Hamas attack7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post