Ynet News (English), on Gaza, 25 October 2026

Ynet calls the men awaiting trial "terrorists" and "operatives" in its own voice in the same sentences that describe them as suspects not yet charged. It states the Israeli death toll of 1,164 as plain fact and never once mentions a Palestinian, a Palestinian death or Israel's genocide in Gaza, even while reporting that Israel will prosecute Palestinians under its own genocide law and that international lawyers will be watching.

8.0

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “Hamas Nukhba terrorists accused of participating”

    What the words do
    Ynet brands the defendants "terrorists" in its own voice in the same clause that says they are only "accused".
    What a reader comes away believing
    That guilt is already settled and the trials are a formality for men known to be terrorists.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself says no indictments have been filed and calls the same men suspects whose number depends on continuing Shin Bet and IOF investigative work.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Indictments are expected against more than 400 suspects”
    • Elsewhere in the article“hundreds of suspects who infiltrated southern Israel”

    Show it in the article

    “transcripts of interrogations of detained Nukhba operatives”

    What the words do
    Ynet calls men held in Israeli detention "operatives" in its own voice, on the say-so of the agencies interrogating them.
    What a reader comes away believing
    Everyone interrogated is confirmed to be a member of Hamas' commando force.
    What is actually the case
    The article gives no independent basis for the label and says the roster of suspects still rests on the Shin Bet's and the army's own work in Gaza.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“will depend on the continuing investigative work of the Shin Bet and IDF in Gaza”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Zana Modzgvrishvili has been appointed to lead the prosecution of more than 400 Palestinians whom Israel accuses of taking part in the 7 October 2023 attack. None has yet been indicted or tried.

  2. Writes Palestinians out of their own story

    Minor

    “in which 1,164 civilians and soldiers were killed”

    What the words do
    Ynet states the Israeli death toll as plain fact, with no source and no caveat, in an article that counts no Palestinian dead at all.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That the dead in this story are Israeli and that there is no other toll to weigh.
    What is actually the case
    The word Palestinian appears nowhere in the article, and nothing is said about the scale of Israel's killing in Gaza, recorded by Gaza's Ministry of Health at 74,392 Palestinians.

    How we know

    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “the October 7 assault on Israeli communities and military installations near the Gaza border”

    What the words do
    Ynet places the whole story at the Gaza boundary while describing only Israeli places and Israeli losses.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That everything of consequence here happened to Israelis on one side of that boundary.
    What is actually the case
    The article reports evidence being gathered by Israeli forces inside Gaza without naming a single Palestinian person, place or death there.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“gathered during combat operations by Israeli soldiers and Shin Bet personnel inside the Gaza Strip”
    • On the recordGaza's Ministry of Health recorded the Israeli occupation as having killed 74,392 Palestinians, a cumulative toll that NewsCord's reading of BBC coverage cites as of October 2026.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Minor

    “the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Law”

    What the words do
    Ynet reports Israel preparing to execute Palestinians under its genocide statute without a word about the genocide finding against Israel itself.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That genocide in this story is a charge Israel brings, not one established against it.
    What is actually the case
    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found on 16 September 2025 that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the ICJ has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry found, on 16 September 2025, that Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip.ohchr.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case against Israel; this is a documented finding, not an allegation awaiting a reporter's verdict.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “International legal observers are also expected to closely monitor the trials”

    What the words do
    Ynet raises international legal scrutiny of Israel and leaves out the existing international legal action against Israel's own leaders.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That international law enters this story only as an audience for Israeli justice.
    What is actually the case
    The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, which the article never mentions.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “was shot after helping stop a terrorist attack”

    What the words do
    Ynet puts Castleman's killing in the passive with no one firing the shot.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That he died in the confusion of an attack, with no clear actor.
    What is actually the case
    The previous sentence names an Israeli soldier, Aviad Frija, as accused over his death, so the article has the actor and leaves him out of this sentence.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“an Israeli soldier accused of causing the death of Yuval Castleman”

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “defendants sentenced to death, or indicted on offenses carrying a possible death sentence, would be ineligible for release under future prisoner exchange agreements”

    What the words do
    Ynet sets out the death penalty law entirely through its sponsors and its mechanics, with no defence lawyer, detainee or rights group given a line.
    What a reader comes away believing
    That no one contests a law allowing Israel to execute hundreds of Palestinian defendants.
    What is actually the case
    The article quotes or paraphrases only Israeli lawmakers, prosecutors and security agencies, and never reports any objection to the law or the trials.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The legislation was initiated by Constitution, Law and Justice Committee Chairman Simcha Rothman”

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Israel names former chief military prosecutor to lead October 7 massacre trials

Former chief military prosecutor Zana Modzgvrishvili has been appointed to lead the prosecution of in the October 7, 2023, massacre, in what is expected to become one of the most complex and sensitive legal undertakings in the country's history. The proceedings are expected to involve hundreds of suspects who infiltrated southern Israel during the Hamas-led attack, along with an extraordinary volume of evidence, witness testimony, victims' accounts and investigative materials. Nukhba, Arabic for "elite," refers to Hamas' commando units, whose members played a central role in . The prosecution effort will be led by Modzgvrishvili, a veteran military attorney who served in the IDF for 22 years and held several senior positions in the Military Advocate General's Corps, including four years as chief military prosecutor. After leaving the military in 2013, she was appointed to a Justice Ministry position responsible for examining complaints against interrogators from the Shin Bet domestic security agency. More recently, she returned to military reserve duty and served as a prosecutor in the case against Aviad Frija, an Israeli soldier accused of causing the death of Yuval Castleman. Castleman, an Israeli civilian, at Jerusalem's Givat Shaul Junction in November 2023. Modzgvrishvili will now be employed as a civilian IDF employee and oversee the extensive prosecution apparatus established to bring the October 7 suspects to trial. The assignment carries significant implications both domestically and internationally. In Israel, the proceedings will unfold under intense scrutiny from bereaved families and a public still grappling with the trauma of the massacre. . More than 400 suspects to face charges, with death penalty possible The legal framework for the proceedings was established in May, when the Knesset approved legislation governing the prosecution of Nukhba operatives in its second and third readings by a vote of 93-0. The law lays the groundwork for trials of a scale not seen in Israel since the prosecution of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, who was tried in Jerusalem in 1961 and executed the following year. The legislation was initiated by Constitution, Law and Justice Committee Chairman Simcha Rothman of the Religious Zionist Party and lawmaker Yulia Malinovsky of Yisrael Beytenu. It was developed through an unusual collaboration between Justice Minister Yariv Levin and Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who have frequently been at odds over major legal and constitutional issues. The law classifies acts committed by the attackers between Oct. 7 and Oct. 10, 2023, as crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The offenses include murder, rape, kidnapping and looting. Its provisions also extend to crimes committed after those dates against hostages held in the Gaza Strip, including those who were killed in captivity. One of the law's most consequential provisions authorizes courts to impose the death penalty not only for murders committed during the October 7 attack, , but also for other serious offenses, including rape, under existing legislation such as and Counter-Terrorism Law. Capital punishment is exceptionally rare in Israel. Eichmann remains the only person executed by the Israeli state following a civilian criminal conviction. Under the new legislation, . Special military court to hear cases The law provides for the establishment of a special military court in Jerusalem to hear the cases. Indictments are expected against more than 400 suspects, although the final number will depend on the continuing investigative work of the Shin Bet and IDF in Gaza. Rather than conducting a single mass trial, authorities plan to organize the proceedings according to the locations where the alleged crimes occurred. Separate trials could focus on the October 7 attacks at Kibbutz Be'eri, Kibbutz Nir Oz and the Nova music festival, where hundreds of people were killed. Each judicial panel will consist of three judges. At least one member must be either a president of a military court or a district court judge holding the rank of president or vice president who is called up for reserve duty to serve on the panel. Convicted defendants will receive an automatic appeal, with a retired Supreme Court justice presiding over the appellate panel. The structure is intended to accommodate an exceptionally large number of defendants while providing a formal mechanism for reviewing convictions and sentences. Massive evidence collection, remote court appearances Following the law's approval, prosecutors, led by the Southern District Attorney's Office, are expected to file indictments based on the extensive evidence collected since the massacre. The evidence includes forensic findings from attack sites, and hundreds of videos documenting the atrocities. A substantial portion of the material was gathered during combat operations by Israeli soldiers and Shin Bet personnel inside the Gaza Strip. The collection and presentation of evidence will be among the most demanding aspects of the proceedings, given the number of suspects, victims and locations involved. In most hearings, defendants will not be physically present in the courtroom. Instead, they will participate remotely through technological systems from detention facilities. Families of those killed and other victims will be able to follow proceedings from a separate courtroom or through digital broadcasts. The arrangements are designed to accommodate the scale and sensitivity of the trials while allowing families access to proceedings involving the deaths of their relatives. First indictment could come in 2027 Despite the legislation's passage, the first indictments may still be months away. During a special session of the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice Committee on Oct. 7, 2026, marking the third anniversary of the massacre, officials raised the possibility that the first indictment could be filed during the first half of 2027. The timeline reflects the scale of the investigative and legal preparations required to prosecute hundreds of suspects for crimes committed across multiple locations over several days. The proceedings will also require courts to address complex questions of criminal responsibility, evidence and sentencing in cases involving some of the deadliest attacks in Israel's history.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)