The Scotsman, on UK Politics, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

John Swinney repeatedly challenged on whether he supports Rosebank, 'yes or no'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

John Swinney has been told to “show a bit of backbone” after he was repeatedly challenged over his position on the Rosebank oil field in the North Sea. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay asked the First Minister five times to provide a “yes or no” answer on whether he supports the controversial project. It comes after UK ministers approved gas production at the Jackdaw field around 150 miles east of Aberdeen. However, a decision has yet to be made on Rosebank, the largest untapped oil field in the North Sea.

Decisions over North Sea licensing are reserved to the UK government, but SNP ministers have previously taken strong positions. In 2023, Nicola Sturgeon said she agreed with former Green Party leader Caroline Lucas that Rosebank was “the greatest act of environmental vandalism in my lifetime”. The SNP’s attitude towards oil and gas has since softened under John Swinney, and the party backed a motion at its recent conference stating domestic production was “clearly preferable to importation”.

Speaking at First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, Scottish Labour leader Michael Marra said he supports Rosebank, and asked what Mr Swinney’s view is. The First Minister said: “The process of consideration of the Rosebank application has got to be applied, but it’s got to to be applied by the quasi-judicial process that the Prime Minister talks about, where the implications of the consenting of that development has got to be compared with the importation of oil and gas.”

Mr Swinney was later challenged over the issue by Mr Findlay, who said it was “torture” attempting to get an answer from the First Minister, adding: “He’s got opinions on Gaza, Israel, Russia, Iran, Europe, but not on the North Sea.” Pressed again, the First Minister said: “In the interest of explaining to Mr Findlay what I said to Mr Marra, there is a legal responsibility for every application to be considered and the carbon emissions that come out of the development of an individual site have to be assessed… as to whether it is compatible with our journey to net zero.

“That is the legal obligation and that is the test and the assessment the United Kingdom government has got to go through.” The Scottish Tory leader urged Mr Swinney to “get off the fence” and “show a bit of backbone”. Scottish Green co-leader Ross Greer said the UK government seemed “intent” on approving Rosebank. He added: “Is the First Minister genuinely suggesting that a monumental oil field could pass a climate test worth the paper it was written on?”

Mr Swinney replied: “The first thing I want to say is that the government is committed to its agenda on climate action and on the legally binding targets that we have set, which is why I answered Mr Marra’s questions in the way that I did. “It is essential that any application that is taken forward for the development of oil and gas resources is able to be done in a fashion that is compatible with the legal obligations that we carry. “Now, the issues that Mr Greer raises are issues that must be assessed as part of that process and must be done comprehensively, because we live in a context just now – and all our energy plans accept this – that for some time to come, we will still be using oil and gas.

“ “That is the purpose of the climate compatibility test.”

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Scotsman gives a fair, well-attributed account of John Swinney being pressed at First Minister's Questions on Rosebank. It ends on Mr Swinney's claim that the choice is between using oil from Scottish waters or importing it. It sets nothing against that claim, although The Guardian reported that many in government believe most of Rosebank's oil would be exported.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Minor

    “The question for us is whether we utilise resources in our own waters or we import those from other jurisdictions.”

    Why this matters
    The Scotsman closes the article on Mr Swinney's words "utilise resources in our own waters or we import those". It leaves them as the final, unanswered statement of what the Rosebank decision is about.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing that approving Rosebank means Scotland using its own oil instead of importing it, so the field is a straight swap for imports.
    The context
    The Scotsman's own analysis four days earlier said the energy security case used for Jackdaw "will not exist for Rosebank". The Guardian reported the same day that most of Rosebank's oil would be exported. Ross Greer's challenge in the article is about the climate test, not this point, so the import claim stands unanswered.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 29 OctFirefighters 'contaminating children's bedrooms' because of a lack of station facilities, MSPs told3.0
  2. 29 OctUK Budget 2026: Healey’s standstill Budget highlights a debilitating fiscal status quo0.0
  3. 29 OctThe BBC is worth defending. Scotland has much to lose if we forget it - Stephen Kerr0.0
  4. 28 OctSNP under attack for 'appalling' drop in new homes despite declaring housing emergency0.0
  5. 28 OctMinisters accused of 'catastrophic failure' for approving gas power station amid climate and energy bill fears0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman