Andy Burnham Approves U.S. Use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford for Strikes on Iran
Image: Sada Al-Balad

Andy Burnham Approves U.S. Use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford for Strikes on Iran

22 July, 2026.Iran.20 sources

Burnham approves US use of UK bases, Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford, for Iran strikes. Framed as defensive by Bloomberg and MEI reports.

1.0We read these line by linei24NEWS framed this story hardest. 2 of 20 sources analysed.See it →
20 outlets2 divides3 facts unevenly coveredseverity 4/10

Beat 1 · The verdict

Novara slams as illegal war; i24NEWS keeps UK 'defensive' framing.

Beat 3 · What got skipped

2 Israeli outlets never mentioned: Iran links escalation to CENTCOM strikes on command centres and air defence.

The Jerusalem Post · i24NEWS

2 Western Alternative outlets never mentioned: Burnham-Ball is backed by Trump and framed as a 'very good' call.

Middle East Eye · Novara Media

Read them yourself

Do not take our word for it. Here is what they published.

All 20 outlets

Full story

Burnham backs US strikes

Britain’s newly appointed Prime Minister Andy Burnham approved the continued use of British military bases by the United States for certain “defensive” strikes on Iran, maintaining a policy established under his predecessor Keir Starmer.

UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham has approved the continued use of British military bases by the United States for certain strikes on Iran

i24NEWSi24NEWS

The decision, described by the UK as defensive, would allow U.S. forces to use the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean and RAF Fairford in England for operations aimed at countering Iranian missile threats and protecting shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

Image from i24NEWS
i24NEWSi24NEWS

i24NEWS said Burnham endorsed the policy after a meeting of senior ministers and security officials held before he took office, and it said he discussed the situation with President Trump in a phone call after taking office.

In that same i24NEWS account, Trump later described the conversation as positive, saying the leaders discussed trade, defense cooperation, and regional security.

Sourcesi24NEWSi24NEWS

Escalation and legal backlash

Bloomberg, as cited by Jordan News, reported that Burnham agreed with Starmer’s decision to allow U.S. forces to use British facilities for “defensive strikes” against Iran, while U.S. officials said President Donald Trump was expected to decide in the coming days whether to expand military operations and resume large-scale combat.

Jordan News said the U.S. airstrikes over the past 10 consecutive nights began on July 7 and targeted Iranian military sites linked to operations around the Strait of Hormuz, and it said one official added that U.S. forces had largely avoided striking areas near Tehran or targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Image from Jordan News
Jordan NewsJordan News

Middle East Eye reported that Burnham’s continuation of Starmer’s policy would face backlash from UK rights groups that previously warned it could violate international law, and it said Human Rights Watch’s UK director Yasmine Ahmed wrote to the prime minister about legal justification that failed to mention issues related to international humanitarian law.

In Middle East Eye’s account, Ahmed cited an air strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab at the start of the U.S.-Israeli assault on 28 February, and it said a preliminary investigation by the Pentagon found the U.S. military was responsible for the attack.

Russia reacts, wider stakes

تحلیل بازار reported that Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia’s representative to international organizations based in Vienna, wrote on X “Poor Britain!” after Burnham confirmed the United States’ use of Britain’s military bases for military action against Iran.

Mikhail Ulyanov, Russia's representative to international organizations based in Vienna, wrote on the social network X about this decision on Wednesday evening: 'Poor Britain!'

تحلیل بازارتحلیل بازار

The same source said the move kept Keir Starmer’s policy in place even as Donald Trump escalates the war, and it described the Diego Garcia base as built in 1971 and as a vital landing site for bombers carrying out missions across Asia.

In i24NEWS’s account, Burnham’s decision was framed as politically sensitive, with critics including opposition parties on the left arguing that allowing U.S. use of UK bases risks making Britain complicit in the conflict.

i24NEWS also said Burnham reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to protecting maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz in his phone call with Trump after taking office.