Indonesian and Australian Researchers Date Sulawesi Cave Handprints to At Least 67,800 Years, Identify World’s Oldest Rock Art
Image: The Guardian

Indonesian and Australian Researchers Date Sulawesi Cave Handprints to At Least 67,800 Years, Identify World’s Oldest Rock Art

21 January, 2026.Asia.10 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Researchers dated a Sulawesi hand stencil to at least 67,800 years ago
  • The hand stencil's fingers were reworked into a claw-like motif indicating symbolic behavior
  • Discovery supports early human migration to Australia from Southeast Asia

Oldest dated rock art

Researchers from Indonesia and Australia have reported a faded ochre hand stencil on the limestone cave walls of Muna, a satellite island off Sulawesi, that is dated to a minimum of about 67,800 years ago and is the oldest reliably dated rock art yet identified.

ABC Science Topic:Archaeology The two hand stencils were hidden under rock art depicting a chicken on a cave wall in Sulawesi

Australian Broadcasting CorporationAustralian Broadcasting Corporation

Teams used uranium–thorium dating of thin calcite and mineral crusts and of microscopic calcium‑carbonate deposits that formed on top of the paintings to establish a minimum age.

Image from Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Australian Broadcasting CorporationAustralian Broadcasting Corporation

The study appears in the journal Nature.

The imagery consists of tan hand stencils with intentionally narrowed or pointed fingertips produced by blowing pigment around hands, and it was found among a wider local tradition of paintings spanning thousands of years, indicating repeated use of the same sites.

Uranium-series dating summary

The age estimate is a conservative minimum derived from uranium-series/uranium-thorium dating of mineral crusts—calcite deposits or "cave popcorn"—that formed on top of the pigment.

Because the dated crust post-dates the painting, the measured ages provide a secure minimum age for the underlying art, and outlets note the technique carries uncertainties so archaeologists report minimum ages rather than exact creation dates.

Image from BBC
BBCBBC

Different reports stress technical details with varying emphasis: some emphasize the method's reliability for establishing a minimum age, while others highlight dating uncertainties and advise caution in interpretation.

Muna hand stencil dating

The new minimum age places the Muna hand stencil ahead of previously dated examples elsewhere.

The hand stencil is more than 1,000 years older than the previous earliest evidence of rock art

Live ScienceLive Science

Several outlets note it is about 1,100 years older than the prior record-holding Spanish hand stencil, which some reports attribute to Neanderthals.

Other reporting situates the find relative to older regional dates, for example earlier Indonesian and Bornean images with minimum ages exceeding 40,000 to 51,000 years.

This underlines that Wallacea and nearby islands now host a growing set of very ancient rock-art dates.

Sulawesi dates and migration

Many outlets draw broader archaeological and anthropological implications.

Several reports link the Sulawesi dates to early human occupation and migration across Wallacea toward Sahul (Australia-New Guinea).

Image from National Geographic
National GeographicNational Geographic

They also suggest cultural continuity or long-lived artistic traditions in prehistoric Indonesia and propose a connection with the ancestors of Indigenous Australians.

Some coverage references genetic evidence and excavation results from northern Australia that support human presence there by roughly 60,000-68,000 years ago.

These findings strengthen the possibility that the same expanding populations carried symbolic practices across island Southeast Asia.

Wallacea cave art overview

A hand stencil was found among many later images, some dated to roughly 4,000–32,800 years, indicating the cave’s use across millennia.

Image from PBS
PBSPBS

Specialists caution that dating estimates are conservative and call for additional fieldwork across Wallacea to corroborate and expand the record.

Several studies note distinctive technical features such as pointed fingers and fragmentary stencils and raise the possibility of recovering DNA from pigment application methods.

Commentators emphasize dating difficulties and the need for more samples before drawing firm species-level or cultural conclusions.

More on Asia