USA17 December, 20252 min read
Jack Smith Defends Criminal Cases Against Trump in Closed-Door House Deposition, Says Cases Stem From President Trump's Actions
This article is an automated aggregation of coverage from news outlets. Our editorials offer in-depth analysis curated by the NewsCord team.
Jack Smith defended his Trump prosecutions in a closed-door House Judiciary deposition Smith said he personally decided to charge Trump and that charges stem from Trump's actions
7 outlets told this the same way.
Smith defends prosecutions
Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his prosecutions of Donald Trump in a closed-door deposition before the House Judiciary Committee, saying the decisions to bring charges were based on the evidence and not on political affiliation. Smith told lawmakers his teams developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump criminally conspired to overturn the 2020 election.
“Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Joe Biden’s predecessor during a private deposition before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, saying the prosecutions ‘rests entirely with President Trump and his actions.’”
He also said his teams amassed powerful evidence related to classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith was subpoenaed after offering to testify publicly earlier, an offer his lawyers say Republicans declined, and his legal team framed his appearance as a response to what they called an unprecedented retribution campaign by the White House.
Special counsel evidence summary
Smith said his team amassed powerful evidence that Trump willfully retained classified material after leaving office. He described how some documents were stored at Mar-a-Lago, including in a bathroom and a ballroom, according to reporting.
The special counsel emphasized that investigative steps were lawful and grounded in relevance to the January 6 probe and the obstruction allegations. He also noted limits on what he could disclose about grand-jury materials during the closed deposition.
Debate over subpoenaed records
A major point of contention in the deposition was Smith's use of subpoenaed toll and phone records from some Republican lawmakers. He defended those subpoenas as lawful and relevant, saying the records, which show numbers and call lengths but not content, demonstrated efforts by Trump and associates to contact members of Congress to delay certification.
“His lawyer Lanny Breuer defended him as a career prosecutor targeted by an ‘unprecedented retribution campaign’ from the administration.”
Smith said he did not personally select which members were subpoenaed and stressed the legal limits on discussing grand-jury evidence. Committee Republicans pressed for more testimony and have pursued interviews with additional officials involved in the subpoenas.
Political and procedural context
Both PBS and NTD noted the 2023 indictments and that the cases were later dropped after Trump’s 2024 election victory, with Special Counsel Smith citing Justice Department guidance against indicting a sitting president. Republicans have used the deposition to allege political motivation, subpoena additional witnesses, and pursue criminal referrals for deputies who invoked the Fifth, and several Special Counsel’s Office investigators and prosecutors have already testified behind closed doors. Smith’s legal team warned of potential retributive actions, and Smith said his decisions would be the same 'regardless of party.'