South Korean Prosecutors Seek Death Penalty for Yoon Suk Yeol Over Attempted Self-Coup

Prosecutors in South Korea have asked the Seoul court to sentence former president Yoon Suk Yeol to death over his short-lived December 3, 2024 martial-law decree.

“Auto news: Will Australians spend over $100,000 on a Chinese car”

9News.au

They accuse him of being the "ringleader of an insurrection" and of mounting a "self-coup" that plunged the country into political chaos and led to his impeachment and removal from office.

9News.au

Multiple outlets report prosecutors framed the decree as an attempt to seize or retain power.

Al Jazeera described the move as a "self-coup" that threatened the "liberal democratic constitutional order," while BBC and okaynews reported prosecutors called Yoon the "ringleader of an insurrection."

RBC-Ukraine and the-star.co.ke likewise reported prosecutors labeled the act an "attempted rebellion" and said they formally asked for the death penalty at closing arguments.

Prosecutors presented testimony and documentary evidence they say indicate violent intent.

Several outlets report a military commander testified that Yoon ordered arrests of lawmakers.

aju press

A planner’s memo reportedly referred to "disposing" or "getting rid" of hundreds of people, including journalists, activists and politicians, according to BBC, okaynews and Бабель.

Yoon denies wrongdoing, saying the decree was a symbolic protest or a desperate, peaceful move to expose opposition corruption or obstruction, a claim quoted by South China Morning Post and BBC.

Under South Korean law, the leading-insurrection charge carries either death or life imprisonment, and prosecutors were required to request one of those sentences, urging the death penalty and arguing there are no mitigating circumstances.

“Prosecutors say Yoon, who was impeached over a failed 2024 martial law declaration, threatened ‘constitutional order’”

Al Jazeera

However, nearly every source notes the practical context: South Korea has not carried out executions since 1997, and experts and reporting across outlets say courts are likely to impose life imprisonment rather than actually execute a convicted former president.

South China Morning Post, bgnes and Al Jazeera explicitly note the country's unofficial moratorium on executions and suggest the death penalty is unlikely to be carried out despite the prosecutors' request.

The trial has been joined with cases against former Defence Minister Kim Yong-hyun and ex-police chief Cho Ji-ho, and prosecutors have sought heavy sentences for those figures; reporting details and timetables vary.

BBC and bgnes report prosecutors seek life for Kim and 20 years for Cho, and note parallel charges such as obstruction of justice for Yoon with separate hearings expected.

BBC

Al Jazeera and the South China Morning Post say closing arguments have concluded and a verdict is expected in February.

Бабель reports Yoon was arrested on Jan. 15, 2025 and faces additional charges, including sedition and aiding an enemy state.

Coverage of the case shows clear source-type differences in emphasis and tone.

“South Korean prosecutors have called for the death penalty to be imposed on former President Yoon Suk Yeol over his declaration of martial law in December 2024, which plunged the country into chaos, AFP reported”

bgnes

West Asian reporting (Al Jazeera) frames the event as an existential threat to democratic order, describing a "self-coup".

bgnes

Western mainstream outlets (BBC, South China Morning Post, bgnes) emphasise the legal process, required sentencing requests, and the historical moratorium on executions.

Regional and other outlets (okaynews, RBC-Ukraine, Бабель, the-star.co.ke) include vivid details from prosecutors' presentations, such as memos about "disposal" or "getting rid" of hundreds, and political claims including Yoon's allegations that opposition MPs sympathised with North Korea.

Those variations reflect differing editorial choices about whether to foreground constitutional threat, courtroom procedure, or dramatic evidence presented by prosecutors.