Press TV, on Iran, 25 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Iran’s as Rubio forgets Trump’s ‘pirates’ boast over ship seizures

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei .

In a post on X on Sunday, Baghaei pointed out that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s claims about Iranian actions against commercial shipping conveniently ignore President Donald Trump’s own that American forces operate “like pirates.”

He responded to Rubio’s recent remarks in which the US secretary of state, accusing Iran of attacking ships, said: “We haven’t seen anything like this since World War II and the pirates of the Caribbean.”

Baghaei juxtaposed this with Trump’s May 1, 2026, comments, made while boasting about the seizure of commercial ships and the confiscation of oil cargoes amid the US naval blockade of Iranian ports: “We’re like PIRATES. We’re sort of like PIRATES.”

“Perhaps the president won’t be too pleased to learn that his secretary of state has so quickly forgotten his own proud claim of being like pirates,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman wrote.

Marco Rubio, accusing Iran of attacking ships، said: “We haven’t seen anything like this since World War II and the pirates of the Caribbean.”

— Esmaeil Baqaei (@IRIMFA_SPOX) October 25, 2026

U.S. President, on 1 May 2026, boasting about seizing commercial ships and confiscating oil cargoes: “we’re like PIRATES. We’re sort of…

The exchange comes as Rubio has intensified efforts to portray Iran as the aggressor in the Strait of Hormuz, claiming in recent interviews that Tehran is targeting commercial vessels in a manner reminiscent of Nazi U-boat tactics during the Second World War.

US officials have simultaneously asserted that shipping volumes through the strategic waterway have largely recovered due to American military escorts, while calling for continued “extraordinary economic pressure” on Iran.

Iranian officials reject this narrative as a deliberate inversion of reality. The root of the insecurity in the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz, Tehran maintains, lies in the unprovoked US-Israeli aggression that began on February 28, which included strikes on Iranian territory, civilian casualties, and the subsequent imposition of an illegal naval blockade on Iranian ports.

Under that blockade, US forces intercepted and seized multiple Iranian oil tankers in international waters .

Baghaei had previously condemned these actions as “the outright legalization of piracy and armed robbery on the high seas.

He wrote, “Welcome to the return of the pirates — only now, they operate with government-issued warrants, sail under official flags, and call their plunder ‘law enforcement.’”

Trump himself later celebrated the seizures, describing the takeover of ships, cargo, and oil as “a very profitable business” and openly stating that US forces were “sort of like pirates but we are not playing games.”

Iranian judiciary officials have noted that the US president “openly confessed to acts of piracy,” contrasting this with Iran’s own actions in the Strait of Hormuz, .

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Press TV reports a social media post by Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman and adopts his argument in its own voice. It calls the US accusations 'stark hypocrisy', calls the US warrants for the tanker seizures a 'pretext', and calls Trump's remark a 'proud admission'. It ends by stating as fact that Iran's own actions against ships comply with international law, though the article itself reports the US accusation that Iran targets commercial vessels.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Baghaei exposes US hypocrisy”

    Why this matters
    The headline uses "exposes" and treats "US hypocrisy" as an established fact that Baghaei uncovered, not as his charge.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes it is proven that the US is being hypocritical, and that Baghaei only revealed it.
    The context
    Hypocrisy is Baghaei's argument in an X post. The body presents it as his comparison of two quotes. It is a position, not a finding the outlet can state.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman wrote”

    Show it in the article

    “has highlighted the stark hypocrisy in Washington’s latest accusations against Tehran”

    Why this matters
    In the opening line the outlet says, in its own narration, that the hypocrisy is "stark" and real. It reports only that Baghaei pointed to it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader starts the article accepting the outlet's verdict that the US accusations are hypocritical, before any evidence is set out.
    The context
    The article later attributes this reading to Iranian officials as their view. The charge belongs to them, not to the outlet's narration.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iranian officials reject this narrative”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei accused Washington of hypocrisy, contrasting Marco Rubio's charge that Iran attacks ships with Donald Trump's remark that US forces were "like pirates".

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “under the pretext of unilateral American court warrants tied to Washington’s extraterritorial sanctions regime”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the US court warrants a "pretext" in its own voice and describes the sanctions as "extraterritorial", with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established that the legal basis for the seizures is a sham.
    The context
    The claim that the warrants are a pretext is Iran's position, as Baghaei's quoted condemnation shows. The article gives no US account of the legal basis and attributes the "pretext" verdict to no one.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the outright legalization of piracy and armed robbery”

    Show it in the article

  3. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “which are carried out under domestic court orders and in accordance with international law to enforce regulations against vessels violating passage rules”

    Why this matters
    The final clause sits in the outlet's own narration. It states as fact that Iran's actions against ships are lawful and target only vessels breaking passage rules. The article then ends with nothing set against it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader leaves believing it is settled that Iran's actions in the Strait of Hormuz are lawful enforcement, not attacks on shipping.
    The context
    The article itself reports that the US Secretary of State accuses Iran of targeting commercial vessels. Whether Iran's actions comply with international law is contested, and the outlet does not attribute this claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“claiming in recent interviews that Tehran is targeting commercial vessels”
    • Elsewhere in the article“accusing Iran of attacking ships”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iranian judiciary officials say Trump "openly confessed to acts of piracy". They say Iran's own actions in the Strait of Hormuz follow domestic court orders and international law, a claim Washington disputes.

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “proud admission”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Trump's remark a "proud admission", a verdict that it is a confession of wrongdoing.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes Trump's remark as an admitted crime.
    The context
    The article quotes Trump saying "we're like PIRATES" while describing seizures. Calling that an admission is the Iranian reading, which the article attributes elsewhere to judiciary officials.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“openly confessed to acts of piracy”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 25 OctIran3.0
  3. 25 OctQalibaf: Any violation of Iran’s territory will trigger response ‘beyond enemy’s imagination’3.0
  4. 25 OctIranian Army intercepts, shoots down US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas3.0
  5. 25 Oct‘Nothing will be the same’: Araghchi says Hormuz management will never return to pre-war era6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 15 outlets covered this story