Press TV, on Iran, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

belonging to the US military .

The Iranian Army’s Public Relations Department said on Sunday that the Army’s air defense systems, operating under the country’s integrated air defense network, hit and shot down a US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas, a city close to the Strait of Hormuz.

The Low-cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System, or LUCAS, is a one-way attack drone. Its design is a copy of Iran’s HESA Shahed-136. The cost of the drone is claimed to be $35,000 per unit.

This is not the first LUCAS drone that Iranian forces have shot down. Another LUCAS drone was also shot down by the Army in July while flying over southern Iran.

In an announcement on Tuesday, the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) said its air defense forces had intercepted and shot down an American MQ-9 Reaper long-endurance drone over the Strait of Hormuz.

Major General Ali Abdollahi, Chief of the General Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces, made the remarks on Saturday, while speaking about unsuccessful US attempts to control the Strait of Hormuz, adding, “The US president must only dream of their military and army entering the Persian Gulf again. They will take this wish to their graves.”

The latest drone presence over Iranian territory comes amid , reached after 40 days of US-Israeli war on Iran.

The US and waged their first war of aggression against Iran, which lasted 12 days, in June 2025. Their second aggression began on February 28, 2026, and came to a halt in early April after 40 days.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Press TV's headline states the Iranian Army's shootdown of a US LUCAS drone as plain fact, though its own body gives it as the Army's statement. It also states, with no source or example, that Washington has repeatedly violated the Islamabad memorandum, and calls Israel's government "the Israeli regime" in its own narration.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Iranian Army intercepts, shoots down US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas”

    Why this matters
    The headline states the shootdown as a plain fact with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes the shootdown is an established, confirmed event.
    The context
    The body gives it only as the Iranian Army's own statement, and other coverage reports the US has neither confirmed nor responded. Reuters and Anadolu headline it as what the army says or claims.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Iran’s Army has intercepted and shot down a LUCAS drone”

    Why this matters
    Press TV opens by stating the shootdown in its own voice, before any source is named.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the Army's account as verified fact from the first line.
    The context
    This is the Iranian Army's claim. The US had not confirmed losing a LUCAS or responded at the time of other reports.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “operating illegally over southern Iran”

    Why this matters
    The words "operating illegally" give a legal verdict in the outlet's voice, with no one named as saying it.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the drone's illegality as settled fact, not as Iran's position.
    The context
    No source in the article makes this legal claim. It is Iran's position and is not attributed. The other outlets report only where the drone was said to be flying.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Washington’s repeated violations of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)”

    Why this matters
    Press TV states as its own fact that the US has repeatedly violated the memorandum. It names no violation and no source.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes US breaches of the agreement are documented and established.
    The context
    The article gives no source or example for this claim. Other coverage describes only a ceasefire and an agreement to finalise a peace deal, with the conflict unresolved.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Israeli regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV calls Israel's government "the Israeli regime" in its own narration.
    The impression it gives
    The reader gets a verdict on a government's legitimacy carried in a label rather than in facts.
    The context
    The word is the outlet's own, with no attribution. A plain report names the Israeli government.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 25 OctIran3.0
  3. 25 OctQalibaf: Any violation of Iran’s territory will trigger response ‘beyond enemy’s imagination’3.0
  4. 25 OctIran’s Baghaei exposes US hypocrisy as Rubio forgets Trump’s ‘pirates’ boast over ship seizures7.3
  5. 25 Oct‘Nothing will be the same’: Araghchi says Hormuz management will never return to pre-war era6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV

See how 11 outlets covered this story