Press TV, on Iran, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Qalibaf: Any violation of Iran’s territory will trigger response ‘beyond enemy’s imagination’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf says Iran is prepared to meet any violation of its territorial integrity with a response beyond its enemy’s imagination, asserting that the country will not be intimidated by threats of all-out war or assassination.

“We will not be intimidated, and we are ready to deliver a response beyond the enemy’s imagination to any violation of the territorial integrity of our great Iran,” the top legislator said on Sunday, addressing the opening of a parliamentary session.

IRGC warns ‘apocalyptic war’ will reverberate beyond Iran, shape region’s fatehttps://t.co/Dm7XuZAP1d pic.twitter.com/iWfGoBEnii

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 24, 2026

“Threats of an all-out war or assassination will not force the Iranian nation to back down from its rights and interests,” he added.

Qalibaf argued that it was the United States that bogged itself down in a quagmire through its miscalculations and unprovoked war against Iran, and now it is the Americans who have to take the necessary steps to extricate themselves.

“Until the Americans change their behavior, abandon their bullying and rapacious ways, and make tangible, concrete, and genuine amends in practice for their violated commitments, none of their claims will carry even the slightest credibility for the Islamic Republic,” he stated. “Iran has nothing new to say.”

According to Qalibaf, the United States has failed to understand the fundamental difference between Iran today and the country under its former Washington-backed monarchical regime, when foreign powers used to exercise considerable influence over the country’s affairs.

“Today, our beloved Iran is not merely free from being a colony of Western and Eastern advisors; it is an independent and powerful regional force that has turned the prospect of the arrogant powers’ and [the forces of] Zionism’s once again dominating this nation’s destiny into a nightmare for good,” he said.

Iran’s top commander says US can only dream of returning to Persian Gulf https://t.co/UyTWlMfwUX

— Press TV 🔻 (@PressTV) October 24, 2026

In his remarks, Qalibaf also marked the anniversary of a historic protest by the late founder of the Islamic Republic, Imam Khomeini, against granting legal immunity from prosecution on Iranian soil to American military personnel and those related to them.

He recalled Imam Khomeini’s denunciation of the former regime, saying the late leader characterized the measure as a testament to the enslavement of the Iranian people and a surrender of an ancient Muslim nation’s independence and dignity in exchange for American dollars.

Qalibaf noted that Imam Khomeini exposed how the regime would sacrifice Iran’s national interests and economic future to American and Israeli interests.

According to the parliament speaker, the significance of Imam Khomeini’s opposition extended beyond the legislation itself, exposing the inseparable connection between the United States and .

He argued that developments in the region and US pressure on Iran through sanctions, assassinations, and military and economic measures reflected the continuation of the same policy of pursuing domination.

Qalibaf, however, reiterated that Iran is no longer a country whose national destiny can be dictated by foreigners.

Read the original article on presstv.ir (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Press TV reports Parliament Speaker Qalibaf's warning that any violation of Iran's territory will meet a response beyond the enemy's imagination, and it attributes his claims to him throughout. Its only lapse is minor: in its own narration it calls the Pahlavi government "the former regime", and it carries "the Israeli regime" into paraphrase without quotation marks.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a law passed by the former regime”

    Why this matters
    In its own narration, outside any quotation, Press TV calls Iran's pre-1979 Pahlavi government "the former regime".
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the outlet's verdict on the monarchy as a neutral description of it.
    The context
    The sentence is the outlet's own voice, not Qalibaf's words. A neutral report would name the government, for example the Pahlavi government or the former monarchy, and leave "regime" to the speaker in quotation marks.

    Show it in the article

    “the Israeli regime”

    Why this matters
    Press TV paraphrases Qalibaf and writes "the Israeli regime" with no quotation marks, so the label reads as the outlet's own term.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes "regime" as the outlet's settled description of Israel's government rather than the speaker's choice of word.
    The context
    The term is a loaded label. In indirect speech without quotation marks it passes into the outlet's voice. It belongs in quotation marks, attributed to Qalibaf.

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “the top legislator said on Sunday, addressing the opening of a parliamentary session”

    It gives the core warning as a direct quotation and says who said it, when and where.

  • “Qalibaf argued that it was the United States that bogged itself down”

    It marks Qalibaf's account of the war as his argument rather than stating it in the outlet's voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Press TV

  1. 26 OctVessels violating Iran’s protocols in southern waters will suffer damage: Top commander3.0
  2. 25 OctIran3.0
  3. 25 OctIran’s Baghaei exposes US hypocrisy as Rubio forgets Trump’s ‘pirates’ boast over ship seizures7.3
  4. 25 OctIranian Army intercepts, shoots down US LUCAS drone over Bandar Abbas3.0
  5. 25 Oct‘Nothing will be the same’: Araghchi says Hormuz management will never return to pre-war era6.0

Everything we scored from Press TV