Times of Israel, on Targeting, 28 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Herzog’s coalition challenge amid election deadlock, and what a caretaker government can and can’t do

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

As the results of Israel’s election firmed up Wednesday, it became increasingly clear that barring any unexpected changes, the country was heading toward another period of prolonged political deadlock that could, if not resolved with a new government, result in another round of elections. With just over 85% of the vote counted by Wednesday afternoon, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s bloc had 53 seats, while the Zionist opposition bloc led by Yashar leader Gadi Eisenkot had 48 seats.

(the previous record was 15, in 2020). At least 61 seats are required for a majority. So who would be in charge amid a political stalemate? In such a situation, the outgoing government would continue to rule as a caretaker government, and the Knesset would operate in a limited capacity. Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Newsletter email address Get it By signing up, you agree to the terms As always after election results come in, the president — in this case, Isaac Herzog — will have to decide which party leader gets the first chance to try to form a government.

President Isaac Herzog and his wife Michal cast their ballots at a polling station in Jerusalem, October 27, 2026. (Yonatan Sindel/FLASH90) Netanyahu will almost certainly not have 61 Knesset members to form a new coalition. At the same time, although the anti-Netanyahu parties will have a majority in the Knesset, Eisenkot and most of his allied party leaders have largely ruled out a government with the Arab parties, meaning the Jewish-led opposition parties will be far short of 61 MKs.

Herzog’s role Under the Basic Law: The Government, the president, Herzog, is empowered to choose who gets the first chance to form a government. Advertisement The law is vaguely worded and gives the president broad leeway in choosing who goes first, though it requires him to consult with the heads of all Knesset parties before deciding. Historically, presidents have chosen the head of the largest faction to go first, likely in this case the Likud party.

But the High Court of Justice has said that the law’s requirement to consult with party heads means the guiding principle for the president is who has the best chance of forming a government. Such a situation arose in 2009, when President Shimon Peres gave Netanyahu the first chance, even though Tzipi Livni’s Kadima party was the largest party. Were the Joint List of Arab parties and Ra’am, , to recommend Eisenkot, then the Yashar party leader would have the support of a majority of MKs to get the first stab at forming a government.

Ra’am chair Mansour Abbas (L) stands alongside Yoav Segalovitz stage following the release of exit poll results in the northern Israeli city of Sakhnin, October 27, 2026. (Michael Giladi/Flash90) Whomever the president chooses, that party leader would have 28 days to cobble together a government, and could request another 14 days if he said he needed more time to finalize a coalition. If those efforts failed, Herzog could give the mandate to form a coalition to another candidate, and that person would then have 28 days to form a government, with no potential extension.

Advertisement Failing that, there is one last opportunity for a government to be formed: A 61-MK majority could recommend to the president yet another candidate to try to form a government, with a maximum of 14 days for such an effort. If that didn’t work, new elections would be called. The caretaker government During this potential 12-week period, outgoing cabinet ministers would continue to serve as the country’s caretaker government.

Under the law, a caretaker government has the same powers and authorities as a permanent government, and can make legally binding decisions, including waging war, conducting diplomacy, and the entire gamut of policy-making. At the same time, several past High Court of Justice rulings have established that caretaker governments must act with greater restraint because they lack a democratic mandate from the Knesset, said Guy Lurie of the Israel Democracy Institute.

“Though it has the legal authority to do anything any other government can do, a caretaker government’s discretion is more narrow, and it has a duty of restraint,” said Lurie. This could become particularly pertinent, with Netanyahu having indicated that he wants to resume the war with Iran. An election campaign poster featuring Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (L) alongside US President Donald Trump, reading, “We have an opportunity to win,” displayed on the back of a bus in Jerusalem, the general election, October 25, 2026. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90) Old Knesset, New Knesset A new Knesset must be sworn in within 14 days of the election.

Until then, the outgoing Knesset members continue to serve under the terms of the Knesset election recess that began when elections were called. In every election recess, a Consensus Committee is formed comprising one member of the coalition and one member of the opposition. Advertisement Both members of the Consensus Committee have to agree to allow Knesset committees to convene to prepare legislation, should the government request it, meaning it is highly unlikely that legislation will be passed in this period.

Knesset activity, and all the more so legislation, is generally unusual and would be extremely controversial in the post-election lame-duck Knesset. After the new Knesset is sworn in, all Knesset committees must be formed anew through what is called the Arrangements Committee, which itself is comprised of all Knesset parties, proportionate to their size. Once the committees are formed, legislation can be advanced and passed into law, even before a government is sworn in.

Speaker Amir Ohana in a preliminary vote to dissolve the Knesset, May 20, 2026 (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90) This happened after the previous Knesset election in November 2022, when Otzma Yehudit leader Itamar Ben Gvir demanded legislation be passed increasing the national security minister’s authority over the police before the government was formed. This situation presents an opportunity for the opposition Zionist parties and to cooperate and use their majority to thwart Netanyahu in some respects, even as he remains interim prime minister.

Channel 12 has reported that the anti-Netanyahu parties, including the two Arab parties, are looking to use their overall majority of seats to replace Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana, a member of Likud. The parties have not yet agreed on a candidate, according to the report, though Yisrael Beytenu MK Oded Forer, and Elazar Stern of Yashar, were named as options being discussed. By choosing a new Knesset speaker, the opposition parties would then be able to control the legislative agenda.

This could allow the opposition to advance parts of its agenda, such as establishing a state commission of inquiry into the events of the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre, which Netanyahu has blocked for the past three years. Times of Israel staff contributed to this report. Advertisement Is our live election coverage important to you? Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage of the 2026 Israeli election?

If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6/month, you will: Support our independent journalists who are working around the clock to report political developments as they unfold; Read ToI with a clear, ads-free experience on our site, apps and podcasts; and Gain access to exclusive content shared only with the ToI Community, including our DocuNation streaming film series and weekly letters from founding editor David Horovitz.

Join The Times of Israel Community JOIN NOW Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this You're a dedicated reader We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month. That’s why we started the Times of Israel - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world. So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE , as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members. Thank you, David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel Join Our Community Join Our Community Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this Most Popular 1 Likud said already preparing to allege election was ‘stolen’ if Netanyahu loses 2 Explainer Israel goes to the polls: A guide to the election and the battle to form a government 3 ToI Live!

WATCH: Israel’s election analyzed, as polls close and exit polls are published 4 In ‘unprecedented confrontation,’ IDF chief said resisting Netanyahu’s order for military action tied to Iran 5 Report: Zamir the only security chief to oppose pre-election military action against Iran 6 Analysis After months of threats by Trump, resumption of Iran war now seems inevitable 7 As polls show deadlock, betting markets strongly favor Eisenkot to replace Netanyahu 8 Turnout hits historic high as Israel votes; election committee rejects multiple claims of foul play read more: Israel Inside 2026 Israeli election Yashar!

With Eisenkot Party Benjamin Netanyahu Gadi Eisenkot Knesset elections If you’d like to comment, join The Times of Israel Community. JOIN THE TOI COMMUNITY Already a member? Log in here close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register Paying ToI Community members are invited to comment on articles Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com Continue Or Continue with By joining you agree to the terms and conditions Send me The Times of Israel Daily Edition back close popup Register to continue Email address * Change REGISTER Or Continue with back close popup Log in to continue Email address * Something went wrong.

Please try again in a few minutes.. Continue back close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register You are currently registered. Please join The Times of Israel Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits Only ToI Community members can comment below articles Email address * Password * Incorrect password. Please try again or choose an option below. Forgot your password? / Send me a login link Continue Sign in without joining Or Continue with close popup Check your email We sent an email to you at .

It has a link that will sign you in. Click the link in that email to complete registration so you can comment. back close popup Join The Times of Israel Community Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits. Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com JOIN NOW! close popup Thank you! Now check your email You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community!

We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Times of Israel explains how Israel's next coalition could be formed and what a caretaker government may do. In its own voice it calls the parties that won a record 19 seats only "the Arab parties" and never uses the word Palestinian, though survey evidence shows most Arab citizens of Israel describe themselves as Palestinian. It also calls Ra'am "more moderate" with nothing in the piece to support the comparison.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “The Arab parties have 19 seats, a historic high”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet reports the record result under the label "The Arab parties" alone.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the 19 seats as the achievement of an ethnic bloc inside Israel, with no link to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    The voters behind these parties are Palestinian citizens of Israel. Survey evidence shows most Arab citizens of Israel choose a self-description containing Palestinian. The word Palestinian appears nowhere in the article.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “the Arabs parties”

    Why this matters
    The outlet repeats the Arab-only label in its own analysis of a possible opposition majority.
    The impression it gives
    Where the outlet describes these parties' new power to check Netanyahu, it again presents them only as "Arabs", never as Palestinian.
    The context
    These are Palestinian-led parties elected largely by Palestinian citizens of Israel. Arab and Palestinian identities coexist, but the article only ever gives the first.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Palestinian-led parties, backed largely by Palestinian citizens of Israel, won 19 seats, a historic high. Eisenkot and most of his allies have largely ruled out governing with them.

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a more moderate Arab party”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the outlet calls Ra'am "more moderate" than the Joint List.
    The impression it gives
    A reader infers that the Joint List is immoderate or extreme.
    The context
    The article gives no policy, statement or act by either party to support the comparison.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

Everything we scored from Times of Israel

See how 316 outlets covered this story