Al-Monitor, on Lebanon, 18 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

'It's family': Lebanese villagers dread looming UN peacekeeper pullout

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

From his shop in south Lebanon near the Israeli border, Mark Diab says life in his village will be turned upside down when a decades-long United Nations peacekeeping force pulls out next year. "UNIFIL isn't just business, to us it's family," said Diab, 59, whose sister is among residents of Ibl al-Saqi who have married peacekeepers from the UN Interim Force in Lebanon over the years. She now lives in Spain. "We're basically open because of the UN.

We started when I was young," Diab said from his shop, just down the road from a UNIFIL base, selling clothes along with other items including alcohol and headphones. The force's withdrawal will hurt the local economy and "will impact our relationships... and we'll lose security and stability," he said, as the sound of an explosion rang out in the distance. "I'm very sad they're leaving... We've spent a lifetime with them." UNIFIL has served as a buffer since Israel first invaded Lebanon in 1978.

It has become part of the fabric of south Lebanese villages like Ibl al-Saqi after decades spent monitoring border hostilities and supporting local communities, including with humanitarian assistance. But after pressure from Washington, the UN Security Council last year voted to end the force's mandate on December 31, 2026. In a narrow garden in Ibl al-Saqi called Norway Square, tattered Norwegian and Lebanese flags flew near plaques paying tribute to peacekeepers from the Scandinavian country whose arrival decades ago forged ties that run deep.

A street sign points to a town in Norway about 5,200 kilometres (more than 3,200 miles) away. Nearby, an Indian flag flew at Mahatma Gandhi Park close to a statue, posters and plaques set up by Indian peacekeepers. - 'Positive mark' - Ibl al-Saqi is located just outside an Israeli-declared "security zone" which runs around 10 kilometres deep in Lebanese territory along the border. It was established after .

Israeli troops operate nearby, and locals advised AFP journalists to avoid southern parts of the otherwise quiet, peaceful village, nestled among hills covered in olive groves. From his municipal office near framed UNIFIL pictures and paraphernalia, mayor George Rahhal said the peacekeepers had brought stability and reassurance to villagers over years of conflict and uncertainty. "They've left a positive mark on everybody's hearts, firstly through security, then the economy, healthcare, supporting schools, the sick," said Rahhal, who like others in the village also has Norwegian citizenship and speaks the language.

"At some point the UN has to leave... but not in these circumstances." Lebanon has called for UNIFIL's mandate to be extended, fearing a security vacuum at a time when hostilities prevent the Lebanese army, whose resources are limited, from deploying across the country's south. Rahhal said many Ibl al-Saqi residents were UNIFIL employees or contractors. Almost "the entire community will be impacted" economically by the withdrawal, directly or indirectly, he said.

"We can live after the international force (leaves), but how and where and who will be responsible for us?" UNIFIL now counts about 7,500 personnel from nearly 50 countries. Spokesperson Kandice Ardiel told AFP it also "has around 400 national staff" and works with numerous local companies providing contracted services. - 'Stayed in our village' - Peacekeepers are stationed in many Israeli-occupied areas now off-limits to most Lebanese after the most recent war.

Many border villages have seen heavy destruction. , including seven peacekeepers . Israel still carries out strikes and demolitions despite a lull in hostilities since late June. Andrea Tenenti, who served as UNIFIL spokesperson for almost 20 years, told AFP that the force's presence "was not simply about maintaining peace and security". UNIFIL "has long been the second largest employer and economic contributor in southern Lebanon, after the Lebanese state", he said.

"Its economic footprint, however, extended far beyond its direct workforce," he added, with associated activities "supporting a much wider network of businesses and livelihoods". Its withdrawal "risks creating a significant vacuum... at a particularly critical time". At a workshop in Ibl al-Saqi, labourers supervised clattering embroidery machines sewing customised items including banners and tags for peacekeepers stationed nearby. Shelves were packed with colourful souvenirs and keepsakes for UNIFIL personnel -- the business's main market after Lebanon's economy collapsed in 2019.

Co-owner Khaled Nahra, 48, said the workshop had been running for some 25 years and had around a dozen employees, but would be forced to close when UNIFIL leaves. "We've stayed in our village... this was the best thing about working with the UN," he said. "There are people who've been working here for 15... 20 years. They're like me. They don't know what to do." lg/jsa

Read the original article on al-monitor.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Al-Monitor runs a mostly careful AFP feature on how one south Lebanon village will be hit by the UNIFIL pullout. When it gives the death toll and the destruction of border villages, it removes Israel from the sentences, although its next line says Israel still carries out strikes and demolitions. It also tells Israel's campaign as a war that simply erupted between two sides, and it uses Iran-backed as its own label for Hezbollah.

  1. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “More than 4,300 people have been killed in Lebanon since March”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor gives the toll as people who "have been killed" with no one doing the killing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns how many died but not who killed them. The deaths read as the general cost of a war.
    The context
    The documented record shows Israel did the killing in Lebanon over this period. The article's own next sentence says Israel still carries out strikes, which makes clear who the actor is.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry's count.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel still carries out strikes and demolitions”

    Show it in the article

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “the latest war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah group erupted this year”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor says a war "between" Israel and Hezbollah "erupted", a phrase that makes two equal sides and gives no actor.
    The impression it gives
    A reader pictures a fight between matched sides that broke out by itself.
    The context
    The record shows Israel invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut. It has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon, while Hezbollah killed roughly 21 in Israel over the same period.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “caught in the crossfire”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor says the peacekeepers died "caught in the crossfire", which suggests two sides firing at each other in equal measure.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the killing in south Lebanon as an even exchange of fire.
    The context
    The record shows the killing in Lebanon is overwhelmingly one-directional: roughly 3,000 Lebanese dead against roughly 21 dead in Israel.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Iran-backed”

    Why this matters
    Al-Monitor uses "Iran-backed" as its own label for Hezbollah, with no source attached.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away seeing Hezbollah chiefly as Iran's instrument rather than as a Lebanese political party.
    The context
    The article attributes the label to no one. Hezbollah's place in Lebanese politics goes unmentioned.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al-Monitor

  1. 26 OctHezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say3.0
  2. 19 OctLebanon uncovers new tunnel amid tensions with Hezbollah: What to know0.0
  3. 15 OctRubio urges Lebanon to not return confiscated explosives to Hezbollah, US official says0.0
  4. 13 OctHezbollah outlines financial aid plan for Lebanese with destroyed homes3.0
  5. 12 OctLikely unexploded ordnance kills teenager in northern Israel0.0

Everything we scored from Al-Monitor