The Jerusalem Post, on Lebanon, 29 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Hezbollah explosives case continues to roil Lebanese politics as ministers boycott cabinet meeting

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

At least four Lebanese ministers are boycotting a cabinet meeting on Thursday in protest of the state's delay in referring Hezbollah to the Judicial Council over attempts to traffic hundreds of kilograms of explosives into Beirut, according to statements by the officials and media reports.Hezbollah has acknowledged that the explosives were theirs, but said they were intended for use against Israel.The shipment's purpose remains under investigation amid concerns among Lebanese officials that the explosives could threaten domestic security and potentially be used in political assassinations.

According to Asharq Al-Awsat, Judge Claude Ghanem, the government commissioner to the Permanent Military Court, was expected to receive on Thursday the findings of investigations conducted by the Directorate of Intelligence of the Lebanese Army, as well as the Information Branch (intelligence, counterterrorism, and criminal investigation unit of the Internal Security Forces), paving the way for charges against suspects whose involvement has been established.Investigators identified seven suspects, including the two men found in the vehicle carrying the explosives who remain in custody.

The Lebanese Forces (LF) party ministers, led by its president, Samir Geagea, announced that they would not attend Thursday's cabinet session, protesting what they described as delays in referring the case to the Judicial Council.In a statement on X/Twitter, Geagea criticized the government's handling of the case, arguing that the ministers' absence from the meeting did not mean they would stop challenging the government from within. He also criticized Hezbollah, describing it as an organization operating outside the law.Agenda set to focus on waste management, not explosives caseThe cabinet agenda was set to focus on waste management, despite calls by several ministers, including Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi, Displaced Persons, Technology, and Artificial Intelligence Minister Kamal Shehadeh, Energy Minister Joe Saddi, Industry Minister Joe Issa El Khoury, and Justice Minister Adel Nassar, to refer the explosives case to the Judicial Council.The cabinet had postponed a decision on the referral, pending further investigation, amid disagreements over the timing and handling of the case.

Justice Minister Adel Nassar has continued to argue that it should be referred to the Judicial Council, not the military courts, warning that it goes beyond the transportation and storage of explosives and poses a threat to national security and civil peace.Nassar told Asharq al-Aswat that the transportation and storage of the explosives endangered Lebanese lives and that Hezbollah's acknowledgment of ownership, alongside its stated intention to use the shipment on a “new support front,” was an admission that Hezbollah intended to continue placing Lebanese national security at risk.Previous reports said that the postponement of the referral had resulted from discussions among Parliamentary Speaker Nabih Berri, President Joseph Aoun, and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post reports a boycott of a Lebanese cabinet meeting by ministers who want the Hezbollah explosives case sent to the Judicial Council, and it attributes the main claims to the officials who made them. It gives Hezbollah's own account of the shipment and says its purpose is still under investigation. The one problem is that the outlet calls Hezbollah an "Iran-backed group" in its own voice, defining a Lebanese party by a foreign state.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the Iran-backed group's”

    Why this matters
    The Jerusalem Post calls Hezbollah "the Iran-backed group" in its own voice, with no source for the label, in a story about a Lebanese cabinet dispute.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Hezbollah first as an arm of Iran, not as a Lebanese party whose handling is being argued over by Lebanese ministers.
    The context
    The article is about a domestic Lebanese political fight: ministers, the Speaker, the President and the Prime Minister disagree over which Lebanese court should hear the case. Nothing in the article concerns Iran. The outlet uses the same unattributed modifier in its earlier reporting, so it reads as a default label rather than a fact relevant to this story.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Hezbollah has acknowledged that the explosives were theirs, but said they were intended for use against Israel”

    The outlet gives the accused party's own account of the shipment instead of letting the ministers' fears stand alone.

  • “The shipment's purpose remains under investigation”

    The outlet says plainly that the assassination fears are unproven and still being investigated, rather than stating them as fact.

  • “protesting what they described as delays in referring the case to the Judicial Council”

    The outlet attributes the charge of delay to the Lebanese Forces ministers rather than adopting it in its own voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctHezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say8.7
  2. 24 OctAre Lebanese Shi'ites abandoning Hezbollah? Poll shows majority favor disarming group - analysis6.0
  3. 23 Oct Lebanese people want Israel ties, stronger government to oust Hezbollah, AMCD head says8.7
  4. 22 OctDefense Ministry sanctions UK registered company after transfer of fuel to Hezbollah-owned company7.3
  5. 22 OctHezbollah recruiting convicts in Latin America for revenue, relaxing ideological requirements7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post