The Jerusalem Post, on Lebanon, 23 October 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

, AMCD head says

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findings

The Lebanese people want “full diplomatic ties” with Israel and to enjoy the benefits of tourism and trade with their neighboring state, but are being held captive by both Hezbollah and a government unwilling to confront the Iran-backed group, President of the American Mideast Coalition for Democracy John Hajjar told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday night.Hajjar, who visited Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and Haifa several years ago, said he grew up hearing stories from his Lebanese grandparents about Jewish holidaymakers who would visit the Lebanese mountains for rest and relaxation when his grandmother was young.

He said Israel and Lebanon had much to offer each other's citizens, arguing that the misapplication of Lebanon's 1955 anti-boycott law had created unnecessary barriers to engagement between the neighboring countries.

The law was originally intended to prevent trade and financial dealings with Israel as part of the Arab League's efforts to economically isolate the Jewish state, but has since been used to prevent even the most basic forms of communication, benefiting Hezbollah and Hamas, Hajjar said.When the boycott law was first introduced, Article 7 stipulated that violations could be punished with three to 10 years of temporary hard labor, alongside financial fines, asset seizures, and product confiscation.

However, Hajjar said, members of the Lebanese diaspora have since faced sentences of up to 15 years in absentia simply for expressing the view that Lebanon would benefit from pursuing peace with its neighbor.More recently, there were efforts to have Lebanon's Ambassador to Washington, Nada Hamadeh Moawad, prosecuted over her message of support to Israeli Ambassador to the US Yechiel Leiter, whose son was wounded in a terror attack.

The Lebanese people demand peace“The Lebanese people demand peace. They want to grow their economy. The infrastructure in Lebanon is in shambles. Lebanon is still a beautiful place, and a lot of economic activity still goes on, but it could be so much better if there were strong ties with Israel,” Hajjar argued. “... It would be mutually beneficial for both Lebanese and Israelis if peace is established.”Earlier this week, Hajjar and his co-chair, Tom Harb, wrote an open letter urging Washington to use its influence with Lebanon to push for the repeal of the boycott law, which would allow religious groups in Lebanon to finally visit the many holy sites in Jerusalem.

They also called on the US to sanction members of the Lebanese judiciary involved in prosecuting violations of the law.“You see it in poll after poll among the Lebanese. They're trying to break the wall of silence imposed by Hezbollah and other terrorist organizations, and by their proxies in the Lebanese government. But I believe that day is fast approaching when people will finally break free and say, 'That's it. We're not going to tolerate these laws that forbid us from speaking with Israelis, and we want full diplomatic ties.” he continued.Nostalgic for the years Lebanon was the “Paris of the Middle East,” Hajjar shared it had been disheartening to see a country he feels so connected with struggle to bear the weight of sectarian violence, terrorism and wars.He argued that, given Lebanon's own experience with Palestinian terrorism, many Lebanese could empathize with Israel following the October 7 attacks .“I think the Lebanese diaspora in the United States understands the persecution of minorities, and they feel a natural affinity to the State of Israel and what Israelis have endured, because the Lebanese themselves have endured the same things in Lebanon for hundreds of years,” he said.

“The horrible terrorist acts of October 7 were happening to the Lebanese in 1976 in Damour and Aishi, another Christian village, which was savagely attacked by the Palestinians. The same methods were used on October 7 in Israel, and I think a lot of Lebanese understand the suffering and feel a natural affinity for Israeli citizens because of what they are going through.”Palestinian armed groups, including Fatah and other PLO-aligned factions, attacked the predominantly Christian town of Damour in January 1976, killing hundreds of people and forcing its inhabitants to flee.

In October that year, Palestinian factions, including Fatah and As-Sa'iqa, attacked the southern Christian village of Aishiyeh, killing dozens of civilians and displacing its population. Palestinian refugees displaced from the Tal al-Zaatar camp were later resettled in Damour, while Aishiyeh was used as a PLO base. In total, more than 600 were killed in both attacks.Asked how to deal with Hezbollah, particularly as AMCD advocates sanctions that critics argue could push Beirut closer to Tehran, Hajjar said Lebanon's government needed to be refreshed if it could not end the “double game” of promising to disarm Hezbollah while turning a blind eye to it.Hajjar calls for stronger government capable of getting rid of HezbollahSofter in his stance for Lebanon's Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, Hajjar didn't mince his words on the corruption in Beirut.

He argued Nabih Beri has grown rich while pushing the boycott laws that deny opportunity to Lebanon's struggling economy“It's time for him to go, and if President Aoun and Prime Minister Salem can't get Hezbollah disarmed, then it's time for them to go,” he insisted.Hajjar said that while the Lebanese people were often seen as eternally patient with a government unable to fulfill its promises, as demonstrated by the lack of justice over the Beirut port explosion and now the arms laws, that patience was waning, as was their willingness to remain “captive by Hezbollah.”“Hezbollah has, despite its claims to the contrary, carried out wave after wave of assassinations against prominent Lebanese officials.

It has infiltrated every segment of the government and civil society. It has operatives throughout the country, even in Druze and Christian areas, and the Lebanese have strong reasons to be very fearful. They also lack strong political leaders, and that is a direct result of the fact that those who have been outspoken and principled have paid with their lives,” he said, acknowledging how hard it has been for the Lebanese to push for any kind of change.Asked about the war with Israel and , Hajjar blamed the Lebanese government, saying that some people were too emotionally affected by the tragic losses to understand its responsibility.“

When you don't have a government that can protect its people and is strong enough to negotiate peace, the consequences can be very disastrous, and that's what has happened,” he shared. “, and I just wish the Lebanese government would realize that they have a common enemy in Hezbollah and other terrorist groups, including Palestinian groups that are still armed in the camps and Hamas, to the extent that it has any operations in Lebanon.”“When all those terrorist organizations are defeated and held accountable, and their leaders are held accountable, either paying the ultimate price or serving long prison terms, maybe for life, then you're going to have more of this,” Hajjar concluded.

“Hopefully, justice will be served, and the Lebanese government will stand up and look out for the interests of the Lebanese, not terrorists and foreigners who don't even hold Lebanese citizenship and are not patriotic Lebanese.”

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post runs a single US-based advocate's view of what 'the Lebanese people' want and lets him blame Lebanon's government for the deaths in the south, with no fact set against him. In its own voice the Post calls the killing in southern Lebanon 'collateral damage', while it names the Palestinian factions behind the 1976 killings and uses the word killing for them.

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “the collateral damage that has wreaked havoc across multiple sects in southern Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    In the Post's own question, 'collateral damage' and 'wreaked havoc' stand in for Israel's killing and destruction in southern Lebanon. No actor is named and no word for killing is used.
    The impression it gives
    The deaths and destruction in the south were incidental side effects of a war, not the result of a sustained Israeli bombardment.
    The context
    Israel has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon, destroyed more than 40,000 homes and displaced more than 1 million people. The same article names the Palestinian factions behind the 1976 Damour attack and says they were 'killing hundreds of people', so the Post names actors and killing for past violence but not for Israel's.

    How we know

    • On the recordIsrael has killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon since 2 March 2026, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry's count.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordIsraeli strikes have destroyed more than 40,000 homes in Lebanon and displaced more than 1 million people.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordIsrael invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut and other areas.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“attacked the predominantly Christian town of Damour in January 1976, killing hundreds of people”

    Show it in the article

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “Some people have paid with their lives, unfortunately, because the Lebanese government is really a failed state.”

    Why this matters
    Hajjar places the blame for the Lebanese dead on Lebanon's own government. The Post adds no fact about who did the killing.
    The impression it gives
    Lebanese people died because their government failed, not because Israel killed them.
    The context
    Israel's strikes killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon, including 589 women and at least 185 children, on the Lebanese Health Ministry's figures. UNICEF said Israeli strikes were killing at least one child a day for weeks.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “I understand why Israel is conducting this war against Hezbollah”

    Why this matters
    This line presents Israel's campaign as a war against Hezbollah alone. It runs into the article's close with no figure or other voice set against it.
    The impression it gives
    Israel's campaign targets Hezbollah, so the dead are Hezbollah or unavoidable casualties.
    The context
    Israel's strikes have destroyed more than 40,000 homes and displaced more than 1 million people. Israel issued evacuation orders covering roughly 14% of Lebanon's territory, far beyond any war on one armed group.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Hajjar blamed the Lebanese government for the deaths. Israeli strikes have killed roughly 3,000 people in Lebanon, including 589 women and at least 185 children, according to the Lebanese Health Ministry.

  3. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “even as the war touched their own country following Hezbollah's attacks a day after the invasion”

    Why this matters
    The words 'the war touched their own country' shrink Israel's invasion and bombardment of Lebanon to a light contact. The clause names Hezbollah's attacks as the starting point and names no Israeli action at all.
    The impression it gives
    Lebanon was brushed by a war that Hezbollah started, with only limited consequences.
    The context
    Israel invaded southern Lebanon and bombarded Beirut and other areas, killing roughly 3,000 people. Hezbollah has killed roughly 21 people in Israel over the same period.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Lebanese people want Israel ties, stronger government to oust Hezbollah”

    Why this matters
    The headline speaks for 'Lebanese people' as a whole. The only voice in the article is the head of a US advocacy group.
    The impression it gives
    The Lebanese public broadly holds the views in the headline.
    The context
    The article quotes no Lebanese person in Lebanon and cites no poll, although Hajjar refers to 'poll after poll'.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“You see it in poll after poll among the Lebanese.”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctHezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran, sources say8.7
  2. 24 OctAre Lebanese Shi'ites abandoning Hezbollah? Poll shows majority favor disarming group - analysis6.0
  3. 22 OctDefense Ministry sanctions UK registered company after transfer of fuel to Hezbollah-owned company7.3
  4. 22 OctHezbollah recruiting convicts in Latin America for revenue, relaxing ideological requirements7.3
  5. 22 OctHezbollah rebuilding military capabilities in Beirut as IDF prepares for possible renewed fighting8.2

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post