The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 23 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran threatens to sever Gulf internet cables in retaliation for renewed US, Israeli attacks

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Tehran has drawn up detailed plans to target undersea communications cables in the Gulf if the United States and Israel attack Iran again, two senior Iranian security officials told Reuters.Their comments followed warnings by Iranian officials that undersea cables in the region could become targets in any renewed conflict if diplomacy with Washington collapses.

The two Iranian security officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, gave few details and did not say how or where exactly Tehran would carry out such attacks. But one of them said Iran would aim to prevent repairs after any attacks to prolong disruptions to communications, including internet connections."If Iran is attacked, there will be no more red lines ... from undersea cables to military bases, including covert ones," one of the officials said.

The official warned Washington not to "play with fire," and said Iran had full access to the undersea cables and could easily destroy them.Yadollah Javani, the deputy head of political affairs for Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), said on Wednesday that Iran could target seven major internet cables beneath the Strait of Hormuz if Iranian infrastructure came under attack.Undersea cables carry around 99% of global internet traffic, according to the International Telecommunication Union, a UN agency.

But the global impact of such attacks by Iran could be limited, as less than 1% of international bandwidth passes through the Strait of Hormuz, said Alan Mauldin, research director at telecommunications research firm TeleGeography.The strait separates Iran and Oman, linking the Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.The US Department of State and Iran's Foreign Ministry did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the Iranian security officials' remarks.

There was no immediate comment from Gulf states.Iran expects war to resume soonThe plans for possible attacks on undersea cables ​leadership that a renewed US military campaign would have to be met with a stronger response than before.Top security official Mohsen Rezaei warned this month that US-linked digital infrastructure across the Gulf, including data centers and AI facilities, could be targeted in a renewed conflict.Washington's Gulf allies have invested heavily in such infrastructure and they "should hold Washington, not Tehran, responsible for any damage to undersea cables," the second Iranian security official said.Alex Vatanka, director of the Iran program at the Middle East Institute in Washington, said such threats were intended to deter renewed conflict and put pressure on Washington by making Gulf governments and US companies fear for their investments in the region."Tehran wants Gulf states and corporate executives to press (US President Donald) Trump over the risks his policies pose to their investment plans," said Vatanka.Cable cuts could slow down internet, disrupt global networksMultiple cable cuts could slow internet services and disrupt financial transactions, e-commerce and cloud computing, analysts said.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

Under the subheading "Iran expects war to resume soon", the article never says that US media had reported that US military advisers had drawn up a target list for a fresh joint US-Israel assault on Iran after the midterms. Without this, a reader sees Iran's expectation of war and its threats with no sign of the planned attack the threats respond to.

How we know

The impact would depend on how operators rerouted traffic and the capacity available on alternative connections, Mauldin said.Restoring connections during wartime could be difficult, experts said, and higher insurance costs and delays in obtaining permits to enter territorial waters could further complicate repairs.

The Red Sea could offer a more significant target than the Strait of Hormuz, particularly if Iran had support from its Houthi allies in Yemen, though Tehran has made no public statement indicating it plans to target cables there.

The Red Sea carries data between Europe, East Africa and Asia, with capacity routed through it accounting for about 3% of global international demand and around 10% of traffic traveling between regions, Mauldin said.Gulf governments have been investing heavily in technology to diversify beyond oil and become global artificial intelligence hubs, deepening ties with US technology firms.Iranian strikes directly hit two Amazon Web Services facilities in the UAE in March and damaged infrastructure near one of its facilities in Bahrain.

The IRGC named US tech companies including Microsoft, Google, Apple and Nvidia as legitimate targets at the height of the war in March.Land-based connections can provide alternative routes for internet traffic, and Gulf states and US technology companies are investing in additional infrastructure to improve resilience.Microsoft plans to invest more than $400 million in subsea and terrestrial connectivity across the Middle East by 2030.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

This Reuters report, run by the Jerusalem Post, attributes Iran's threat to Gulf undersea cables carefully to named and anonymous Iranian officials and sets it against expert data showing the impact could be limited. In one line it states as fact what Iran's leadership believes, without a source. It also leaves out reporting that the US and Israel are planning a renewed assault, so a reader sees Iran's expectation of war without the reason for it.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “reflect a conviction in Iran's”

    Why this matters
    The words "reflect a conviction in Iran's" leadership state, in the outlet's own voice and with no source, what Iran's leadership privately believes.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that Iran's leadership holds this conviction, as if the reporter knew it directly.
    The context
    The only sources in the article are two anonymous security officials and public statements by Javani and Rezaei. The article attributes everything else to them, but not this reading of the leadership's mind. It should have been tied to those officials.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“If Iran is attacked, there will be no more red lines”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    Under the subheading "Iran expects war to resume soon", the article never says that US media had reported that US military advisers had drawn up a target list for a fresh joint US-Israel assault on Iran after the midterms. Without this, a reader sees Iran's expectation of war and its threats with no sign of the planned attack the threats respond to.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “less than 1% of international bandwidth passes through the Strait of Hormuz, said Alan Mauldin”

    The report sets the threat against a named expert's figure, so the reader is not left with an inflated sense of global danger.

  • “two senior Iranian security officials told Reuters”

    The central claim is attributed to its source from the first line and is never stated as the outlet's own fact.

  • “though Tehran has made no public statement indicating it plans to target cables there”

    The report marks the Red Sea scenario as analysts' speculation and does not present it as an Iranian plan.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 25 OctTehran threatens strikes on energy, civilian targets, and nuclear escalation if attacked6.0
  2. 24 OctIraq believes Israel may have struck militia weapons supplied by Iran - report6.0
  3. 24 OctIran-backed militias in Iraq accuse US of violating airspace, as threats grow - analysis3.0
  4. 24 OctTrump says US may renew strikes against Iran, 'do another little Epic Fury'3.0
  5. 23 OctTurkey says renewed attack on Iran would expand conflict, diplomacy only way0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post