Israel’s election yielded a stalemate. Which means Netanyahu has won

There seems to be some confusion about the result of Israel’s election, specifically as regards who won. That’s somewhat understandable. Neither of the two rival sides has secured a Knesset majority. But it’s also incorrect. The election, and the stalemate, show one clear winner: Benjamin Netanyahu. How so? Simply because he does not have to do anything in order to retain power — not to concede anything, not to compromise on anything. And that’s because the political forces arrayed against him have no realistic means of ousting him.

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Newsletter email address Get it By signing up, you agree to the terms They do have the votes, in principle. With the count near-complete, the anti-Netanyahu parties — Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar, Naftali Bennett’s B’Yachad, Yair Golan’s Democrats and Avigdor Liberman’s Yisrael Beytenu, plus the two Arab parties, the Joint List and Ra’am — have won a clear Knesset majority over the pro-Netanyahu bloc: 67 seats to 53.

But they do not have the means to translate that Knesset majority into a majority government, or even a minority government. And that’s because 19 of those 67 anti-Netanyahu seats are held by the two Arab parties. Whatever you, me, President Isaac Herzog, Netanyahu, Eisenkot, or anybody else has to say about the right of duly elected Arab Knesset members to serve in an Israeli government, or of Eisenkot to swear in a minority government reliant on the votes or even abstentions of those Arab MKs, the fact is that Liberman, whose party members would not defy him even if they wanted to, will not consent to any such process.

Neither will some members of Eisenkot’s party. Bennett, too, has stated that “the Arab parties are not Zionist and we will not rely on them,” though he was more equivocal in a recent Times of Israel interview . Advertisement Eisenkot himself, in our interview in early October, left a little bit of wiggle room.  Here’s the relevant exchange: Gadi Eisenkot: … If [Netanyahu] does not win an outright majority… he hopes the other side will be unable to form a coalition and that he will simply remain caretaker prime minister indefinitely.

I will not allow that to happen. I will convince my colleagues to replace him. The Times of Israel: In other words, you will try to form a minority government, with outside support from the Arab parties? Gadi Eisenkot: I do not want the support of the Arab parties, and I am not calling on them to support me. If we reach a situation where I do not have a 61-seat majority, I will bring my government to a vote and call on Likud as well, and on all the Zionist parties, to support me.

I believe it cannot be ruled out that at least one Haredi party will stay out of the vote and strategically abstain. But Eisenkot’s Zionist opposition bloc has won a mere 48 seats, nowhere near a majority, and with no prospect even of swearing in a minority government. Nobody in Netanyahu’s bloc is going to “strategically abstain,” and that wouldn’t help him much anyway; Liberman will not cooperate; his own Yashar party cannot be fully relied upon; he’d need the active support, rather than mere abstentions, not only of the newly unpalatable Ra’am party (which did sit in the 2021-22 Bennett-Lapid coalition), but also of the Joint List, whose positions are intermittently empathetic toward terrorist organizations, and whose Balad component is avowedly anti-Zionist… The cumulative list of insurmountable obstacles goes on and on.

Wherever it winds up, the investigation announced by the Central Elections Committee on Thursday morning into alleged foreign interference in the election, with Likud predictably asserting that Ra’am “stole the elections,” is not going to make the Arab parties more acceptable in the eyes of those who already discount them. Similarly, it is impossible to take seriously Thursday’s anonymously sourced reports that the seven-strong United Torah Judaism party is considering abandoning Netanyahu’s bloc to support a minority Eisenkot-led coalition from the outside.

What would it gain? Eisenkot, who lost his son and two nephews fighting in Gaza, is not going to concede to UTJ’s core demand for the ongoing mass exemption from the draft of the ultra-Orthodox community. Advertisement Various commentators have been positing truly ridiculous scenarios by which Eisenkot might somehow become prime minister: US President Donald Trump calls him up and tells him he needs a general at or near the helm in Israel as he prepares to try again to defeat the Iranian regime; Netanyahu goes along with the idea.

Netanyahu does a deal with Herzog under which he partners Eisenkot in a unity government, takes first turn as prime minister but, in an ironclad agreement, pledges to honor that arrangement in exchange for a presidential pardon in his corruption trial, and then puts himself forward as candidate for president when Herzog’s term ends in July 2028. I could go on. I won’t waste your time. The best opportunity Netanyahu’s victory, and the Zionist opposition’s failure, are remarkable.

There could hardly have been a more dismal, and therefore helpful, reality in which to unseat the prime minister and his coalition: Netanyahu and his allies held office when Hamas invaded on October 7, 2023; he refused to accept prime ministerial responsibility, much less resign; he prevented the establishment of a state commission of inquiry, the single most effective means of understanding and learning from the failures surrounding that blackest of days and thus of preventing a recurrence.

He defied the will of a huge majority of the people in refusing to draft ultra-Orthodox males to national service. Hamas has reasserted control over most of Gaza’s populace; the Iranian regime remains in situ, bent on Israel’s destruction, with Netanyahu himself warning days before the election that Israel consequently faces the threat of a “second Holocaust.” He has indulged and minimized rampant violence by settler extremists against Palestinians in the West Bank, violence not only condemned abroad but opposed by most Israelis.

His closest aide, who ran his election campaign, is under investigation for allegedly working for Qatar from inside the Prime Minister’s Office before and after October 7. Israel’s economy is facing global sanctions related to settlement expansion that, Netanyahu suggested last week , could be so damaging as to require the startup nation to become an outlaw, sanctions-busting nation, resorting to cryptocurrency to try to circumvent them.

And the Zionist opposition parties, a fractious alliance of the left, center and right, with a lackluster campaign , got nowhere near majority support to defeat him. Yashar party chairman Gadi Eisenkot alongside members of his party at the party’s election headquarters in Tel Aviv, after the release of exit poll results, October 27, 2026. (Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90) Take it or leave it Netanyahu has been assuring his outgoing coalition partners that he intends to stick with them.

He may not actually want to stick with all of them, and perhaps least of all with the far-right thug Itamar Ben Gvir and his Otzma Yehudit party. Nonetheless, in his elated speech in the early hours of Wednesday, he promised to establish a “strong, national, right-wing” government, as opposed to any kind of unity government — potentially limiting his own capacity to muster a majority coalition of his own. From Netanyahu’s point of view, that’s no disaster.

He would prefer a widened coalition, including some of those who currently oppose him. As things stand, that Knesset majority for the anti-Netanyahu parties is significant and highly problematic for him. It dooms his judicial overhaul agenda, for a start. But, crucially, the bottom line is that he will retain power for the next few months anyway, while Herzog goes through the process of consulting with the representatives of the incoming Knesset parties, and potentially charging Eisenkot and Netanyahu with the task of building a coalition.

Eisenkot, who may well get the first opportunity, will not succeed. Netanyahu, when his turn comes, will set out his terms — making clear, among other core positions, that he will continue to block a state commission of inquiry. And if, as is likely, none of the Zionist opposition parties are prepared to accept those terms, Israel will head to new elections. Advertisement If so, next time, there’ll be no comparable mass fly-in of anti-Netanyahu voters, no comparably sky-high Arab turnout, and a likely even more disunited opposition.

The brain drain and wider emigration of Israelis opposed to Netanyahu will have continued, and likely accelerated. There’ll be relatively more ultra-Orthodox voters. And the incumbent prime minister, having survived an election in the least propitious possible circumstances, will be justifiably confident of faring better still. Millions of Israelis are committed to maintaining a democratic state with a Jewish majority, to a non-supremacist Judaism, to aspiring to peace with those nations in the region who genuinely seek it while protecting itself from enemies bent on its destruction, to greater unity within.

Leaders come and go. New, charismatic, inspirational figures emerge. Stances change, alliances shift. Realities impose themselves on political leaders, and on the electorate. But October 27 was not only the best opportunity the anti-Netanyahu political forces had to unseat him. It may also echo long into Israel’s future, in the struggle to return the State of Israel to its foundational democratic and liberal Jewish principles. This was arguably the most consequential election in Israeli history.

And Netanyahu won. — This is an updated version of the Editor’s Note sent out earlier on Thursday in ToI’s weekly update email to members of the Times of Israel Community. To receive these Editor’s Notes as they’re released, join the ToI Community here . Is our live election coverage important to you? Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage of the 2026 Israeli election? If so, please join The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6/month, you will: Support our independent journalists who are working around the clock to report political developments as they unfold; Read ToI with a clear, ads-free experience on our site, apps and podcasts; and Gain access to exclusive content shared only with the ToI Community, including our DocuNation streaming film series and weekly letters from founding editor David Horovitz. Join The Times of Israel Community JOIN NOW Already a member?

Sign in to stop seeing this You're a dedicated reader We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month. That’s why we started the Times of Israel - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world. So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE , as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members. Thank you, David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel Join Our Community Join Our Community Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this Most Popular 1 With 90% of votes counted, Netanyahu bloc has 53 seats, Eisenkot’s 48; Arab parties surge to 19 2 Likud said already preparing to allege election was ‘stolen’ if Netanyahu loses 3 Analysis Arab parties emerge as potential kingmakers, presenting Zionist opposition with fateful choice 4 Op-ed Election leaves Israel’s political future uncertain, but Netanyahu still clearly controls its present 5 Op-ed For pro-Israel diaspora, Israel’s Arab voters are a point of pride.

For Israeli Jews, they’re a national security threat 6 Full text Eisenkot: I will do my utmost to form a Zionist government, with national service for all; Netanyahu should step down 7 Eisenkot and Netanyahu each vow to form next coalition, even as exit polls predict stalemate 8 Exit polls show outgoing Netanyahu coalition losing majority, but uncertainty over nature of next government read more: Israel & the Region 2026 Israeli election Benjamin Netanyahu Gadi Eisenkot If you’d like to comment, join The Times of Israel Community.

JOIN THE TOI COMMUNITY Already a member? Log in here close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register Paying ToI Community members are invited to comment on articles Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com Continue Or Continue with By joining you agree to the terms and conditions Send me The Times of Israel Daily Edition back close popup Register to continue Email address * Change REGISTER Or Continue with back close popup Log in to continue Email address * Something went wrong.

Please try again in a few minutes.. Continue back close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register You are currently registered. Please join The Times of Israel Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits Only ToI Community members can comment below articles Email address * Password * Incorrect password. Please try again or choose an option below. Forgot your password? / Send me a login link Continue Sign in without joining Or Continue with close popup Check your email We sent an email to you at .

It has a link that will sign you in. Click the link in that email to complete registration so you can comment. back close popup Join The Times of Israel Community Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits. Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com JOIN NOW! close popup Thank you! Now check your email You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community!

We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.