Ynet News (English), on Targeting, 3 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

United against Netanyahu, divided over allies: Eisenkot's bloc holds first post-election meeting

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

For the first time since Israel's election, and just ahead of the consultations with President Isaac Herzog over who should form the next government, the leaders of the bloc seeking to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are meeting Tuesday. Before the gathering at the Dan Accadia Hotel in Herzliya, opposition leader Yair Lapid told reporters that "the conduct of the past few days is another reminder that we need to remove Netanyahu and his people from the Prime Minister's Office."

Joining Lapid at the meeting are the leaders of the four parties in the bloc, which together won 48 Knesset seats: Yashar! chairman Gadi Eisenkot, Beyachad chairman Naftali Bennett, Democrats chairman Yair Golan and Yisrael Beytenu chairman Avigdor Liberman. Speaking as he arrived, against the backdrop of Likud's claims of "election theft" and an ongoing investigation into the matter, Lapid said: "We are facing an extreme and dangerous attempt to invalidate the election.

I have been shown all the intelligence material. The election was conducted properly, and there is absolutely no reason to overturn it. They are simply unwilling to admit that they lost. Now we need to form a government. Netanyahu and his people have caused enough damage to the State of Israel and the people of Israel." Golan, who is pushing for , met earlier Tuesday with Joint List leaders Yousef Jabareen and Ahmad Tibi.

Liberman, meanwhile, did not rule out forming a government with the ultra-Orthodox parties. In a social media post, he wrote: "We must prevent another election. In the current political situation, there is enough room for maneuver, and with the right navigation, we can quickly establish a functioning, stable government without Ra'am or the Joint List." Senior figures in the change bloc say their immediate priorities include what they describe as a "takeover of the Knesset," replacing Speaker Amir Ohana, establishing the Arrangements Committee responsible for organizing parliamentary proceedings and repealing controversial legislation advanced by the coalition during the previous term.

Beyond the Knesset, which the bloc now considers its "most urgent task" ahead of the swearing-in of the new parliament, discussions are also focusing on the party leaders' plans for the coming period. Each has a different position and a different understanding of the political opportunities available. Eisenkot is determined to advance the formation of a minority government and has decided to focus, among other things, on the ultra-Orthodox parties.

However, he has not publicly ruled out relying on the Arab parties for support. Nor has he rejected the possibility of a unity government, although he remains concerned that Netanyahu could once again maneuver politically to the disadvantage of his partners. Liberman categorically rules out serving in a government with Netanyahu but has left the door open to discussions about bringing the ultra-Orthodox parties into a coalition. That possibility remains complicated by the unresolved military conscription framework, which the next government will have to address.

Golan is pressing forcefully for a government supported by Ra'am, repeatedly emphasizing that , cannot be ignored. Bennett, however, shares Liberman's view that . He believes that if Eisenkot pursues that path, the government would not survive, leading to another election in which Netanyahu could return stronger and remain in power for a lengthy term.

The disagreements extend beyond the composition of the next government to the appointment of the next Knesset speaker. Liberman and Bennett want Lapid to take the position, while Eisenkot wants it filled by a member of his own party. During Tuesday's meeting, the leaders are expected to discuss replacing the current speaker and the mechanisms for doing so. Such a move would require the signatures of 61 Knesset members. Another issue concerns the preliminary work conducted by teams representing the parties during the election campaign.

The teams held extensive discussions about legislation that could be advanced during a transitional period, although both Eisenkot and Liberman have reservations about some of the proposals. Eisenkot, for example, objected to applying a proposed "defendant's law" retroactively. Liberman, meanwhile, has made clear that he believes legislation establishing a state commission of inquiry could not be passed by a caretaker government if Israel were forced into another election.

Representatives of families affected by the October 7 massacre also arrived at the meeting. Outside the venue, they declared: "You have a mandate. Do not help legitimize leaders who were at the wheel during the massacre. Form a government of change." They added: "The people cast a vote of no confidence in the government of October 7. We demand that you work together to replace the government of the massacre, establish a state commission of inquiry and restore the founding values on which the State of Israel was established."

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Ynet reports the first meeting of the opposition bloc after Israel's election and sets out its leaders' disagreements over whether to rely on the Joint List and Ra'am. In its own voice it calls the voters behind those lists only "Arab citizens" and the lists "the Arab parties". It never names them as Palestinian, even when it names Ahmad Tibi.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “the votes of Arab citizens, who turned out in unusually high numbers in this election”

    Why this matters
    Ynet describes the record turnout in its own clause "who turned out in unusually high numbers in this election" and names the voters only as "Arab citizens".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these voters to be an ethnic minority within Israel's electorate, separate from the Palestinian people.
    The context
    These are Palestinian citizens of Israel. Most of them have described themselves as Palestinian in survey evidence, and the article never uses the word Palestinian for them anywhere.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “cooperation with the Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the Joint List and Ra'am "the Arab parties" in its own voice, in the same sentence that names Ahmad Tibi as a Joint List leader.
    The impression it gives
    A reader understands these parties as an ethnic bloc inside Israeli politics, with no link to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    The parties are Palestinian-led, and Tibi himself is a Palestinian member of the Knesset. The article gives the reader no sign of either fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “a government cannot depend on the votes of the Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    Ynet paraphrases Bennett's position and repeats "the Arab parties" as its own description, rather than quoting his words.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes Bennett's refusal as a dispute about relying on an ethnic minority's parties, not a refusal to let Palestinian citizens' representatives count towards a government.
    The context
    The seats in question were won by Palestinian-led lists elected by Palestinian citizens of Israel. NewsCord's audit counted Ynetnews among the Israeli outlets that used only the Arab label.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Golan is pressing for a government supported by Ra'am, stressing that the votes of Palestinian citizens of Israel, who turned out in unusually high numbers in this election, cannot be ignored. Bennett shares Liberman's view that a government cannot depend on the Palestinian-led parties.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers. Netanyahu called it an emergency, his rival promised them no state, and most of the press called them Arabs.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 15 outlets covered this story