The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Hundreds of Hebron families displaced by IDF operations, uncertain when they can return - interview

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

The Israeli military did not give families ample time to pack before they were made to evacuate their homes and has not offered any assurances on whether and when they will be allowed to return, Riad Khamis, the spokesperson for Hebron's official Support and Relief Committee, told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.The IDF has established new checkpoints and following , Palestinians from the Ein Deir Bahha neighborhood, which killed two Israeli soldiers and wounded several others.Sharing data collected on Monday from Ein Deir Bahha, Al-Jilda, Khillet Al-Magharbeh, Farsh Al-Hawa, and surrounding areas, Khamis said that 407 households, comprising 2,649 people, had been affected by the military action.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article never mentions that Israeli occupation forces demolished buildings during the operation and took over homes as military positions. The Post reported the destruction of structures two days earlier, and other outlets report a residential building and five commercial and industrial facilities demolished. Without this, a reader believes the families' homes are standing and simply waiting for their return.

How we know

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article ties the displacement to the attack but never says what the Post itself reported. The army gave little information about any offences by the people it removed beyond their family connection to a clan, and the two attackers were killed. Without this, a reader believes the removals targeted people linked to the shooting rather than whole families.

How we know

The figure included 1,109 people under the age of 18, of whom 180 were under the age of two; 218 elderly people; 115 pregnant or postpartum women; 28 people with disabilities; and 162 living with chronic illnesses.Milena Ansari, Director of Physicians for Human Rights Israel's Palestinian Territory Department, told The Post on Sunday that the disruption of routine for the chronically sick and/or disabled could create an emergency situation.“People with chronic conditions like diabetes, hypertension, kidney disease, or cancer depend on regular treatment and medication.

These arbitrary closures interrupt that care. Displacement also separates people from their medications, doctors, and medical records,” Ansari warned. "A condition that could be managed with routine care can quickly become an emergency, which then runs into the same blocked roads, closures, and restrictions on movement. Of course, winter makes every one of these risks even worse.”

The majority of displaced Palestinians have found alternative accommodationThough the large majority of the displaced Palestinians have found alternative accommodation, with related or renting other homes, Khamis said that .“Some families found themselves without safe accommodation or a suitable alternative, and some were forced to spend the night outdoors,” he told The Post. “When we say that 185 families have no safe place to stay, we are describing a difficult humanitarian reality.

These families have no alternative accommodation beyond staying with relatives, resulting in overcrowded and unsuitable living conditions. Some are also struggling to obtain the most basic necessities of life.”Asserting the need for humanitarian intervention, he told The Post that from the data collected from the displaced so far, 231 households needed food supplies, 129 in need of medicines, 107 in need of baby formula and diapers, and 126 in need of shelter.Others have reportedly submitted requests for support with clothing, mattresses, blankets, and psychological support.Displaced families given inadequate time to prepare for their evacuationKhamis said that the displaced families had complained they were not given enough time by the IDF to prepare to leave their homes and that the evacuations “took place under difficult, high-pressure conditions… without sufficient clarity about how long the evacuation would last or when families would be allowed to return to their homes.”“There was no direct communication with the military, except through notices and demands to leave.

These did not provide clear and sufficient information about the duration of the operation, the nature of the measures being taken, or the guarantees concerning residents' return to their homes,” he said.Adding to this, Khamis said that they had received no information to suggest Israeli authorities established any arrangements to help facilitate the evacuation of elderly, disabled or sick Palestinians, which “presented a significant humanitarian challenge, particularly because some families include people who require medical care and ongoing assistance.”

The IDF has not yet responded to The Post's request for comment on the allegations.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the families have no assurance about returning but leaves out that Defence Minister Israel Katz publicly set a condition: they would not be allowed back until what he called "Hamas infrastructure" was dismantled.

How we know

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

The Jerusalem Post gives a Hebron relief official room to describe the displacement in detail. In its own voice, though, it says the IOF "evacuated" parts of Hebron, a word that hides the forced removal its own earlier report described. It also calls the shooting a terror attack without attribution, gives two conflicting counts of families with no safe shelter, and leaves out the demolitions and Katz's stated condition for the families' return.

  1. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “evacuated parts of Hebron”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post says the IOF "evacuated" parts of Hebron, the army's word for removing people from their homes.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes this as an orderly removal, the kind done for residents' own safety, rather than the forced removal of more than 2,600 people from their homes.
    The context
    Israeli occupation forces forced the residents out. Israel's own defence minister called them forcibly displaced. The Post's earlier report said troops "forcibly evacuated" them, and other outlets describe soldiers ordering people out by loudspeaker.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces set up new checkpoints and forced residents of parts of Hebron from their homes after Friday's shooting attack on a checkpoint, in which two Israeli soldiers were killed.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Minor

    “a terror attack carried out on Friday by Ahmad and Hamouda Al-Jabar”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Post calls the shooting a "terror attack" and names the two men who carried it out, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the terror label as settled fact, and it frames the mass displacement that follows as a response to terrorism.
    The context
    The attack was a shooting at a military checkpoint in which two soldiers were killed. The "terror" label is the Israeli army's and government's term, not a neutral description.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses figures that mislead

    Minor

    “168 households had no safe accommodation available”

    Why this matters
    The Post gives a figure of 168 households with no safe accommodation and does not reconcile it with the figure in the quote that follows.
    The impression it gives
    A reader cannot tell how many families are without a safe place to stay.
    The context
    Khamis's own quote in the next sentence gives a different number, 185 families.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“185 families have no safe place to stay”

    Show it in the article

  4. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never mentions that Israeli occupation forces demolished buildings during the operation and took over homes as military positions. The Post reported the destruction of structures two days earlier, and other outlets report a residential building and five commercial and industrial facilities demolished. Without this, a reader believes the families' homes are standing and simply waiting for their return.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article ties the displacement to the attack but never says what the Post itself reported. The army gave little information about any offences by the people it removed beyond their family connection to a clan, and the two attackers were killed. Without this, a reader believes the removals targeted people linked to the shooting rather than whole families.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the families have no assurance about returning but leaves out that Defence Minister Israel Katz publicly set a condition: they would not be allowed back until what he called "Hamas infrastructure" was dismantled.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctHebron business demolitions carried out without prior hearing, state tells High Court6.0
  2. 26 OctEast Jerusalem man found dead near Bethlehem, police conduct series of West Bank raids3.0
  3. 26 OctIDF finds underground shaft near West Bank home of Hamas terrorist who killed two soldiers6.0
  4. 25 OctIDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report3.0
  5. 25 OctIDF seals off homes of terrorists who committed fatal Hebron attack ahead of intended demolition7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post