The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

IDF finds underground shaft near West Bank home of

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The IDF announced on Monday that it had discovered a concealed underground shaft near the home of in an attack on Friday.According to the IDF, the shaft was approximately 15 meters deep and relatively narrow. It was found near the terrorist's home in the Hebron area of the West Bank.While the discovery was not unprecedented, underground shafts are extremely rare in the West Bank. Underground warfare has been more commonly associated with Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, where tunnels have played a significant role in military operations, than with Hamas in the West Bank, where the IDF maintains greater control and surveillance.

The discovery came after the IDF searched throughout the West Bank, particularly in the Hebron area, .

The IDF also said it had found an unidentified electronic device inside the shaft. The device was transferred to investigators for examination.Two troops killed after terrorists with machine gun open fire in West BankStaff Sergeant Ron Yonatan Roytman, 23, from Ashkelon, and Sergeant Yuval Shai Svilem, 20, from Hod Hasharon, were named on Friday as the two soldiers killed in the attack.Roytman was a squad commander, while Svilem was a combat soldier in the Ari Battalion (775) of the Search and Rescue Brigade, according to the IDF.Both soldiers were killed in combat at the Judea Junction when , armed with an M4 machine gun and a pistol, opened fire on soldiers at the scene.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post calls the two men who shot soldiers at a Hebron junction Hamas terrorists in its own voice, with no source for the label or the Hamas link. It sums up the IOF operation as searches and efforts, without the forced expulsion of 2,000 Palestinians and the destruction of buildings that it reported two days earlier. Every fact in the article comes from the IOF, and Palestinians appear only as a count of homes searched.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “Hamas terrorist who killed two soldiers”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the man whose home was searched a "Hamas terrorist" in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the attacker was a Hamas member and that the attack was terrorism.
    The context
    The article gives no source for either the label or the Hamas link. The attack was a shooting at soldiers at a checkpoint, and the Times of Israel described the same men as "Palestinian gunmen". The paper's own earlier report says both men were killed at the scene.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “one of the Hamas terrorists who killed two IDF soldiers”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence repeats the label and the Hamas affiliation as the paper's own description, outside the attribution to the IOF that follows.
    The impression it gives
    A reader treats the men's group and status as settled before any source is named.
    The context
    Nothing in the article sources the Hamas membership. The only attribution, "According to the IDF", covers the shaft's depth, not who the men were.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “two terrorists traveling in a car”

    Why this matters
    The account of the shooting labels both men terrorists in the outlet's voice while describing an attack on soldiers at a junction.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the label as a neutral description of the shooters.
    The context
    The label rests on no cited source. The same sentence says the men opened fire on soldiers stationed at a checkpoint, and other coverage calls them gunmen.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    “as part of its efforts following Friday's attack”

    Why this matters
    The phrase "its efforts" sums up the military response as searches of homes and other locations.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the operation in Hebron consisted of searches that turned up a shaft.
    The context
    Two days earlier the same paper reported that IOF troops and the Shin Bet forcibly expelled 2,000 Hebron-area Palestinians and destroyed structures. It said the army gave little information about any offence by those expelled. The Times of Israel also reported that the attackers' family homes were sealed.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “approximately 500 Palestinian homes and other locations”

    Why this matters
    Palestinians appear only as a count of homes searched. Every fact in the article comes from the IOF.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the army's account of the raid on Hebron.
    The context
    No resident, family member or Palestinian official is quoted about the searches or the shaft, though the operation took place in their homes.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“According to the IDF, the shaft was approximately 15 meters deep”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctHebron business demolitions carried out without prior hearing, state tells High Court6.0
  2. 26 OctEast Jerusalem man found dead near Bethlehem, police conduct series of West Bank raids3.0
  3. 26 OctHundreds of Hebron families displaced by IDF operations, uncertain when they can return - interview6.0
  4. 25 OctIDF seriously injures, fails to detain Palestinian accused of attempted ramming attack - report3.0
  5. 25 OctIDF seals off homes of terrorists who committed fatal Hebron attack ahead of intended demolition7.3

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post