Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 15 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

A tractor-sized thank you: American Jews help

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findingsSee them marked on ynetnews.com

An American organization supporting Israeli settlements in the West Bank held an appreciation event in Brooklyn, New York, honoring donors who helped finance tractors and agricultural equipment for Jewish farming communities in the territory and the Jordan Valley. American Friends of Judea and Samaria (AFJS) organized the event to recognize supporters whose contributions have funded the purchase of tractors, farming machinery and other equipment used by agricultural farms in the region.

The organization works to promote education and public awareness about Judea and Samaria, the biblical names commonly used by Israelis for the West Bank, while strengthening ties between American supporters and Jewish communities in the territory. In recent years, AFJS has also launched an initiative aimed at expanding Jewish agricultural activity in the West Bank and Jordan Valley, providing machinery and essential equipment to farmers and young families establishing and developing agricultural communities.

The initiative seeks to strengthen Jewish settlement and farming in areas that supporters regard as part of the Jewish people's historical homeland. Israeli settlements in the West Bank, , . Agricultural farms and outposts have become an increasingly prominent part of Israeli settlement activity in the territory, where land ownership, access and settlement expansion remain central issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article names farms and outposts as a growing part of settlement activity and quotes the funding going to young pioneers establishing farms. It leaves out that Ynet itself reported two weeks earlier that unauthorised outposts are used as staging points for attacks on Palestinian villages, and that Palestinians harvesting olives have suffered serious attacks. Without this, a reader sees the outposts only as farms and a land dispute.

How we know

During the Brooklyn event, donors received certificates of appreciation and miniature tractor models representing the types of agricultural vehicles purchased with their contributions and now operating on farms in the region. Each model was mounted on a specially crafted wooden base bearing a personal dedication to the donor, intended to symbolize the connection between American Jewish supporters and Israeli farmers in the West Bank. The gifts and certificates were presented by AFJS Chairman Rafi Lazerowitz and the organization's CEO, Yigal Dilmoni, who thanked donors for their continued support of agricultural development, Jewish settlement and security in the region.

Addressing the gathering, Dilmoni acknowledged the uncertainty and concerns facing Jewish communities in the United States and said the initiative offered American supporters a tangible connection to Israel. "We know that you are living here in New York and throughout the United States during a challenging time, accompanied by uncertainty and concern about the future," Dilmoni said. "It is precisely at such a time that we want to remind you of something important: everyone who partners with us through AFJS has a tangible stake in the Land of Israel."

He emphasized that the contributions went beyond financial assistance, describing donors as active participants in the expansion of Jewish agricultural communities. "You are not simply making donations from afar. You are active partners in the renewal of Jewish settlement in Judea and Samaria and in the return of the Jewish people to their homeland," he said. Dilmoni said the tractors and other agricultural equipment were helping farmers cultivate land, develop farms and establish a lasting Jewish presence in the region.

"The tractors and agricultural equipment you have helped provide enable young pioneers to cultivate the land, develop agricultural farms, strengthen our presence on the ground, and preserve the lands of the Land of Israel for future generations of the Jewish people," he said. He concluded by describing the equipment as a symbol of the relationship between American donors and Israeli farmers. "Every time one of these tractors heads out to work in the fields of Judea and Samaria, a part of you goes with it," Dilmoni said.

""

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

Ynet reports a Brooklyn fundraiser for tractors sent to settler farms in the occupied West Bank, and its headline recasts settlement expansion as the future of West Bank farming. The article writes the settlements' illegality as a view held by the UN that Israel disputes, never calls the West Bank occupied, and closes on the organisers' words while the Palestinians whose land is at stake never speak.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “are considered illegal under international law by the United Nations and most of the international community, a position Israel disputes”

    Why this matters
    Ynet writes the settlements' illegality as something the UN and "most of the international community" consider, then sets it against "a position Israel disputes".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the legality of the settlements is an open argument between the UN and Israel.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law. That is a court's finding, not one side's position.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “which Israel captured from Jordan in the 1967 Middle East war”

    Why this matters
    Ynet describes the West Bank only as land Israel "captured" in 1967, and nowhere in the article calls it occupied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told how Israel took the territory but not its legal status today, in a story about funding Israeli settlement there.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful. The article turns on settlement expansion in that territory, yet the words occupied and occupation never appear.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

  2. Tells the event as something else

    Serious

    “cultivate the future of West Bank farming”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the donations help to "cultivate the future of West Bank farming", as if the money supports farming in the territory in general.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the story as a warm piece about agricultural aid to the West Bank's farmers.
    The context
    The body says the organisation exists to support Israeli settlements, and that its initiative aims to strengthen Jewish settlement and expand Jewish agricultural communities. The headline drops settlement entirely and presents settler expansion as the future of farming in a territory where Palestinians farm.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“An American organization supporting Israeli settlements in the West Bank”
    • Elsewhere in the article“seeks to strengthen Jewish settlement and farming”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    US group honours donors who funded tractors for Israeli settler farms in the occupied West Bank.

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “This is the true partnership between American Jews and the pioneers in the Biblical Land of Israel.”

    Why this matters
    Ynet ends on the AFJS chief executive's line about "pioneers in the Biblical Land of Israel", after a run of his quotes on settlement, homeland and preserving the land.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the organisers and donors on what the tractors are for and whose land they work.
    The context
    Palestinians appear only inside the phrase "the Israeli-Palestinian conflict". No Palestinian voice addresses the land being cultivated or the settlement the equipment is meant to expand.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“central issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict”

    Show it in the article

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article names farms and outposts as a growing part of settlement activity and quotes the funding going to young pioneers establishing farms. It leaves out that Ynet itself reported two weeks earlier that unauthorised outposts are used as staging points for attacks on Palestinian villages, and that Palestinians harvesting olives have suffered serious attacks. Without this, a reader sees the outposts only as farms and a land dispute.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 11 NovFrance bars settler leader Yossi Dagan over West Bank settlement activity6.0
  2. 10 NovPalestinian Authority still pays terrorists millions despite Abbas pledge, study finds0.0
  3. 10 NovIDF arrests 10 Islamic Jihad suspects over alleged plot to attack Israelis in northern West Bank7.3
  4. 4 NovIDF caught off guard as Jewish families move into 8 West Bank homes near Jericho without approval8.7
  5. 4 NovIDF caught off guard as Jewish families move into 8 West Bank homes near Jericho without approval8.7

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)