Ynet News (English), on West Bank, 4 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

IDF caught off guard as near Jericho

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

The IDF has criticized the uncoordinated arrival of Jewish families at homes near the West Bank city of Jericho, saying Wednesday's move caught both the military and Division 96, which operates in the Jericho area and along Israel's eastern border, by surprise. The army was forced to divert approximately three platoons of combat troops , pulling them away from other security assignments, including efforts to prevent smuggling along the Jordanian border and additional routine security operations.

Earlier Wednesday, ynet learned that Jewish families had moved into eight homes - near the Palestinian city of Jericho following a covert operation to purchase the properties. The Nachala settlement movement led the initiative, with the backing and assistance of the Binyamin Regional Council. Security teams prepared for the operation, which was kept secret until the families entered the homes.

The families used a model familiar from Hebron, where Jewish groups have purchased homes from Palestinians and moved into them quickly without coordinating with security authorities. In previous cases in Hebron, the IDF would remove the new occupants until the purchase documents had been verified. In this case, however, the properties are located in Area C, which is under Israeli civilian and security control, and .

Nevertheless, the homes are situated immediately adjacent to Area A, which is under the Palestinian Authority's civilian and security control, . The military therefore deployed troops to the area, operating on the understanding that the new residents must be protected. In the coming days, the IDF will seek to develop a security arrangement for the families who have moved into the homes.

Earlier Wednesday, responding to questions about the developments near Jericho, the IDF Spokesperson's Unit said: "The entry into the homes was carried out without prior coordination with the IDF and without authorization. The purchase process and its resulting security implications are currently being examined by the relevant authorities. IDF forces are present in the area."

Meanwhile, it emerged Wednesday that President Isaac Herzog sent a strongly worded warning letter last month to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Israel Katz and National Security Council chief Shmuel Ben Ezra, expressing alarm over .

The letter, dated October 8, warned of a potential national and security catastrophe. It was also circulated in recent days to senior IDF General Staff officers, the attorney general and the foreign minister.

"I feel a profound and urgent duty to write to you from the depths of my heart and warn you about the situation I have encountered, because we are one step away from disaster," Herzog wrote. "The very possibility of firearms being used against Israeli civilians, or, God forbid, a deadly attack against members of the security forces, carries the potential for an explosive outcome. An outcome that could lead to civil war."

IDF's 98th Division prepares to leave the West Bank

At the same time, after nearly 40 days of operations, the IDF's 98th Division is expected to conclude its deployment in the Judea and Etzion sectors in the coming days.

In September, in an unusual move, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir ordered additional forces into the West Bank in response to a complex security situation. The deployment came amid tensions surrounding the Jewish holidays and elections, a series of attacks carried out by lone assailants and an increase in nationalist violence.

Zamir deployed the 98th Division primarily to strengthen command and control over forces operating in the Etzion and Judea sectors and maintain operational control of the area. With the tense election period now over, the division is expected to complete its mission, and responsibility for the sectors will return to the IDF's West Bank Division, as before.

However, the 98th Division is being withdrawn despite the absence of an effective solution to nationalist violence, including violence committed by Jewish extremists. The military appears to have been particularly concerned about the convergence of security threats during the recent period of heightened tensions, and with that period now over, the decision was made to withdraw the additional division from the West Bank.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Ynet reports a Nachala settlement movement operation that moved families into eight homes near Jericho, but never says the West Bank is occupied or that settlements there are illegal. In its own voice it calls the settlers "new residents" on "state land", and it gives no Palestinian a word, mentioning Palestinians only as a security risk next door.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “in Area C - under full Israeli civil and military control”

    Why this matters
    Ynet describes the land only as "under full Israeli civil and military control" and never calls it occupied territory.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Israel's control of Area C is ordinary sovereign control, and that a settlement movement moving families in is lawful apart from the army's paperwork.
    The context
    The ICJ found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful and its settlements illegal. The article turns on a new settlement near Jericho yet never says occupied, illegal or unlawful anywhere.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “illegal” and “unlawful”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Settlers from the Nachala settlement movement moved into eight homes near Jericho in the occupied West Bank, where the ICJ has ruled Israel's occupation unlawful and its settlements illegal.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “on state land rather than privately owned Palestinian property”

    Why this matters
    Ynet adopts Israel's designation "state land" in its own voice and sets it against Palestinian property as if that settled the question.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the homes sit on land that legitimately belongs to the Israeli state, so nobody is wronged.
    The context
    The land is in the occupied West Bank. The ICJ found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal, so Israel's label "state land" decides nothing about lawful title.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “to secure the new residents”

    Why this matters
    Ynet calls the settlers "the new residents", as if they were people moving house.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes these are ordinary residents who now need protection.
    The context
    The article itself says a settlement movement organised the move, so these are settlers founding a settlement presence in occupied territory.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Nachala settlement movement led the initiative”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “Jewish families move into 8 West Bank homes”

    Why this matters
    The headline names the actors only as "Jewish families", a religious and domestic label in place of settlers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes families simply bought and moved into homes.
    The context
    The body says the Nachala settlement movement led a covert operation, backed by the Binyamin Regional Council, to plant settlers beside a Palestinian city.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with the backing and assistance of the Binyamin Regional Council”
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  3. Tells the event as something else

    Minor

    “without approval”

    Why this matters
    "Without approval" makes the only problem a missing permission from the Israeli authorities.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the move would have been proper had the army approved it in advance.
    The context
    Settlement in occupied territory is illegal whether or not the IOF coordinates it, as the ICJ found.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  4. Softens settler violence

    Minor

    “the growing threat posed by nationalist violence in the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice Ynet calls the violence "nationalist violence" and names neither who commits it nor who suffers it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the violence is a general, sideless threat in the West Bank.
    The context
    Later the article admits it includes violence committed by Jewish extremists. Settlers in the West Bank operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by its army.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“violence committed by Jewish extremists”
    • On the recordWest Bank settlers operate armed by the Israeli state and accompanied by the Israeli army.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “creating potential security risks for the new residents”

    Why this matters
    Palestinians in Area A appear here only as a source of risk to the settlers.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the only people affected by the move are the settlers and the soldiers sent to guard them.
    The context
    The article quotes the IOF spokesperson and President Herzog. It gives no Palestinian from Jericho, no seller and no Palestinian official a word about eight homes taken beside their city.

    How we know

    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

  1. 3 Nov‘The film distorts reality’: IDF legal chief attacks NAZA, condemns West Bank violence8.0
  2. 2 NovBurning tires, roadblocks and violence: 18 Jewish extremists arrested in West Bank outpost evacuation3.0
  3. 2 NovIDF Announces End of Hebron Operation - Ynet News7.3
  4. 28 OctIDF expands West Bank operations with counterterrorism raids as Hebron offensive continues9.4
  5. 27 OctIDF launches operation to demolish terrorist memorials in West Bank7.3

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)