The New York Times, on Gaza, 2 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Israel Lists It Says Were Militants Posing as Media Workers

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The Israeli military has published an investigation saying that who had presented themselves as journalists were actually militants, that it targeted journalists in violation of international law. Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin, the Israeli military spokesman, said Thursday that Israel had found more than 100 members of Hamas and dozens of operatives from Palestinian Islamic Jihad, as well as other militant groups, who had been labeled members of the media were actually combatants.

“Soldiers were criticized before the facts were checked,” General Defrin said. The military published a graphic with the faces of men it said had duped the international community, along with a website with some findings about all those it said were “exposed.” Some of the entries in the Israeli report have photos, social media posts or records said to have been found in Gaza purporting to show membership in a militant group, while others are based on intelligence the Israeli military says it cannot share.

The Committee to Protect Journalists lists 190 deaths of Palestinian reporters and media workers that it has documented during the war. It attributes one to a Palestinian militant group, making Israeli forces “responsible for the vast majority of killings of journalists and media workers worldwide since 2023” it says. About 78 people appear on both the Israeli military’s list and C.P.J.’s, meaning they disagree about whether the people were really journalists or militants.

But for the most part, the two lists do not overlap — more than half of the people Israel says used journalism as mere cover are not claimed by C.P.J. as killed media workers, and more than half of the media workers C.P.J. says were killed were not disputed by Israel. Neither list has been independently verified by The New York Times. Journalist groups like C.P.J., the United Nations and news organizations have accused Israel of deliberately targeting journalists in Gaza.

Israel has mostly blocked reporters and outside investigators from entering the enclave, making what happens there opaque to the world. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The New York Times reports the Israeli military's list of 170 people it says were militants posing as journalists, and it attributes that claim carefully, setting it against the Committee to Protect Journalists' records. But the headline and opening sentence write the 170 as simply killed in Gaza or in the war, never saying that Israeli forces killed them. The verb "rebutting" also gives the military's unverified report more weight than the article's own facts support.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “170 Killed in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the 170 were "Killed in Gaza" with no one doing the killing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these as deaths that happened in Gaza, with no named party responsible.
    The context
    The list is the Israeli military's own account of people its forces killed. The article itself says the report answers accusations that Israel "targeted journalists", and C.P.J. attributes all but one journalist death to Israeli forces.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“It attributes one to a Palestinian militant group”
    • Elsewhere in the article“rebutting accusations that it targeted journalists”

    Show it in the article

    “170 people killed in the war in Gaza”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence says the 170 were "killed in the war", which turns the killer into the war itself.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that people died in a war, not that Israeli forces killed them and are now justifying it.
    The context
    The same article reports that C.P.J. holds Israeli forces responsible for nearly all journalist deaths. About 78 people appear on both lists, so Israel's report concerns people its own forces killed. Other coverage describes them as "killed in strikes on Gaza".

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “rebutting accusations”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the Times says the military's report is "rebutting" the accusations, a verb that implies the charge has been answered.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking Israel's investigation has disproved the claim that it targeted journalists.
    The context
    The article itself says some entries rest on intelligence the military will not share, and that neither list has been verified. The report is a response to the accusations, not a rebuttal of them.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“intelligence the Israeli military says it cannot share”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Neither list has been independently verified”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 11 OctWringing Hope From the Rubble of Gaza3.0
  2. 9 OctNavi Pillay, South African Jurist, Is Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize3.0
  3. 9 OctIsrael Denounces the Decision to Award the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay3.0
  4. 7 OctOn This Day, Oct. 7: In 2023, Hamas-led Militants Launched Surprise Attacks on Israel3.0
  5. 6 OctWhat Went Wrong in the Effort to Free the Oct. 7 Hostages?0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times