The Jerusalem Post, on UK Politics, 15 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

UK barrister who called for ‘final solution’ for Israel gets four-month suspension, sparking outcry

No framing issues found.

A British criminal defense barrister has been suspended for four months for calling for a "final solution" and "the gas chamber" for Zionists.Forz Khan, who has been a registered barrister since July 1988, was suspended by a three-person disciplinary tribunal on November 10, on account of "professional misconduct."

According to the publicly available disciplinary findings, Khan posted on LinkedIn three times in March 2025: "There is only one solution to the evil that is zionism [sic]. Unless there is a complete global cleansing this pernicious cult will continue to spread its hate, genocide and evil."In the same month, he also wrote: "There is only 1 final solution to that problem that is Israel" and "The world needs to eradicate Zios globally."Khan then posted twice in April 2025: "Scum like this should be in a gas chamber" and again "There is only 1 final solution to the problem of israel [sic]."The tribunal said the statements were "antisemitic and/or seriously offensive" and thus suspended Khan from practice for four months.

Khan was also ordered to pay £2,880 in costs.MP Nick Timothy slams four-month suspensionSocial media users lamented the brevity of the sentence, noting that some individuals have received jail time for smaller offenses."By 'Zios' he meant Jews, of course, and he was suspended for just four months," said Nick Timothy, a Conservative MP for West Suffolk.Barrister Forz Khan posted that the “world needs to eradicate Zios” and said: “Scum like this should be in a gas chamber.”

By “Zios” he meant Jews, of course. He was suspended for just four months. I will be taking this up with the Bar Standards Board. https://t.co/qrOcOCLayA— Nick Timothy MP (@NJ_Timothy) November 14, 2026Timothy announced he will be pursuing the matter with the Bar Standards Board.'Zio' is widely considered an antisemitic slur after being popularized by former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke, who used it frequently in his writings and broadcasts as shorthand for Jewish people.

In 2016, a UK Labour Party inquiry into antisemitism led by Shami Chakrabarti recommended that party members stop using the term, describing it as a racial epithet.Khan previously suspended in 2018Khan was suspended in 2018 after spreading serious, unsubstantiated allegations against a fellow barrister, including rape, stalking and threats to kill.At the time, Khan was representing a solicitor who had been involved in an affair with the barrister.

The relationship ended after she discovered that the man was married.Khan subsequently repeated allegations that the barrister had raped and stalked his client and threatened to kill her. He also contacted the barrister's wife via LinkedIn.The Bar Standards Board found Khan guilty of professional misconduct and initially imposed a seven-month suspension. Khan appealed, arguing that the disciplinary action breached his rights to freedom of expression and privacy and did not meet the threshold for professional misconduct.In September 2018, the High Court upheld the misconduct findings but ruled that the suspension was excessive, reducing it to three months.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The Jerusalem Post reports that a tribunal suspended the barrister Forz Khan for four months over social media posts calling for a "final solution" for Israel and saying "Scum like this should be in a gas chamber". It quotes the posts from the published disciplinary findings, attributes the antisemitism finding to the tribunal and the reading of "Zios" to Nick Timothy MP. Nothing in it misleads the reader.

What it gets right

  • “According to the publicly available disciplinary findings, Khan posted on LinkedIn three times in March 2025”

    The Post names its source for the posts and quotes them word for word, so the reader can judge exactly what Khan wrote rather than a paraphrase.

  • “The tribunal said the statements were "antisemitic and/or seriously offensive"”

    The Post attributes the antisemitism finding to the tribunal that made it and keeps the tribunal's own qualified wording, rather than adopting a stronger verdict in its own voice.

  • “arguing that the disciplinary action breached his rights to freedom of expression and privacy and did not meet the threshold for professional misconduct”

    In recounting Khan's earlier case the Post gives his own grounds of appeal and reports that the High Court cut his suspension, so his side of that record appears alongside the findings against him.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 12 NovSave the Children UK decides not to adopt IHRA antisemitism definition despite review’s advice3.0
  2. 10 NovBritain would prefer additional communication channels with Russia, Streeting says0.0
  3. 9 NovAround 78% of Britons view Israel as a serious threat to world peace, survey finds3.0
  4. 8 NovPro-Palestine activists spread pamphlets condemning Mann antisemitism review for NHS - report0.0
  5. 7 NovBritain’s colonial legacy undermines its moral lectures against Israel - opinion6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post