Ynet News (English), on Targeting

6.0out of 10Serious

'Netanyahu has lost': Yair

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

With about 60% of the votes counted and neither bloc holding a majority needed to form a government, Democrats chairman Yair Golan declared Wednesday morning that "Netanyahu has lost" and called for a coalition that includes Arab parties. Golan said nothing to reporters gathered outside his home but laid out his plan in a post on X.

Shortly after 9 a.m., updated election results showed that with 60% of the ballots counted, Netanyahu's bloc had secured 56 seats and Eisenkot's bloc 48.

"Netanyahu has lost," Golan wrote on X. "I know how to count to 120 — 65 is more than 55. That's how Israeli democracy works. Period. The reality before us must teach us one resounding lesson: We have no future here unless we stop being afraid. And unless we put an end to racism. We can no longer accept Netanyahu's racist distinction between Jewish votes and Arab votes."

Golan continued: "The vote of an Israeli citizen casting a ballot in Tira is worth exactly the same as that of an Israeli citizen voting in Givat Shmuel. Not less. Not approximately. Exactly. Anyone who tries to erase the votes of Arab citizens is surrendering to Netanyahu and giving up on Israel.

"And now let's talk about Zionism. Netanyahu's bloc includes 16 lawmakers from non-Zionist ultra-Orthodox parties that promote mass draft evasion while our children are fighting and dying.

"If Netanyahu insists on counting only a Zionist majority, he should first subtract the 16 lawmakers from the non-Zionist ultra-Orthodox parties in his own bloc. They have no right to lecture us on Zionism.

"The change bloc has a Zionist majority: 49 to 39. The change bloc has an Israeli majority: 65 to 55. We have a majority. We have a responsibility. And we have an opportunity to form a government of change in partnership with Israel's Arab citizens. A government that will serve all Israeli citizens.

"Now we need courage. We need leadership. We need to stop being afraid and start taking action. A government of change now!"

On Tuesday night, following the release of the exit polls, officials at Democrats Party headquarters repeatedly delivered the same message: "Netanyahu's bloc has collapsed." At the same time, they called for the formation of a government, even if it meant or bringing Ra'am, an Islamist Arab party, into the coalition and the next government.

"The Israeli public fired Netanyahu and Likud on Tuesday," Golan said that night, urging members of the bloc to act. "We must make sure those dismissals take effect. We must establish a government of change as soon as possible."

Golan has now broadened his appeal to include the Joint List, .

Golan also said Tuesday night: "The mandate we received from the public is a directive to rebuild the country. When given such a directive, we do not hesitate, allow egos to get in the way or leave room for political maneuvering.

"Israel's citizens have taken their fate into their own hands. We are at a historic moment. Israel's security is at stake. Forming a new government is an urgent national security mission. Every day of delay could have serious consequences.

"The responsibility to prevent Netanyahu from leading Israel into war for political reasons rests with us."

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Ynet reports Yair Golan's call, after partial results, for a coalition that includes the Arab-majority parties that Palestinian citizens of Israel vote for. In its own voice, in the headline and in its explanatory glosses, Ynet calls them only "Arab parties" and "Arab-majority parties" and never uses the word Palestinian. The reader is not told that, in a 2019 survey, most Arab citizens of Israel chose a self-description that included Palestinian.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “Golan calls for coalition with Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    The headline, in Ynet's own voice, names the parties Golan wants to govern with only as "Arab parties".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the parties and the voters behind them to be simply an Arab ethnic minority inside Israel, with no national tie to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    Most Arab citizens of Israel describe themselves as Palestinian. In Sammy Smooha's 2019 survey, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. The article never uses the word Palestinian anywhere, so the headline's label is the only identity the reader is given.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “relying on outside support from Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    Reporting the Democrats' plans in its own words, Ynet again uses "Arab parties" and treats them as an outside support option for a Jewish-led government.
    The impression it gives
    A reader understands the debate over relying on these parties as one about an ethnic bloc, cut off from the Palestinian identity of the people who vote for them.
    The context
    The citizens these parties represent are mostly people who describe themselves as Palestinian, according to the 2019 Smooha survey. The article uses no word that tells the reader so.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“adult Arab citizens of Israel, 61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “an alliance of Arab-majority parties”

    Why this matters
    Ynet glosses the Joint List in its own voice as "an alliance of Arab-majority parties". This is the one place it explains who the list is.
    The impression it gives
    A reader learns that the Joint List is defined by an Arab majority and nothing more about the national identity of its voters.
    The context
    The list's constituency is Palestinian citizens of Israel, most of whom chose a Palestinian self-description in the 2019 survey. Golan's own quoted words ("Arab citizens") are his, but this explanatory gloss is Ynet's.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    'Netanyahu has lost': Yair Golan calls for coalition with parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel. A fair report would describe the Joint List and Ra'am as parties representing Palestinian citizens of Israel, and would keep Golan's own phrase "Arab citizens" inside quotation marks.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 590 outlets covered this story