The Jerusalem Post, on West Bank, 5 November 2026

9.1out of 10Severe

near PA-controlled Jericho in secret operation

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

Dozens of settlers moved into eight homes on the border of Jericho, in the village of Ein Diouk al-Tahta, on Wednesday after secretly coordinating their purchase with the Binyamin Regional Council, the Nachala Movement announced in collaboration with the council.

The homes are located just meters from the Palestinian Authority-controlled city, . However, they are technically in Area C, which is under Israeli military and civil control.Peace Now, an advocacy movement promoting a two-state solution, alleged that around 30 settlers arrived at noon on Wednesday to take control of the homes and noted that there were unverified reports of violence. The organization added that the new settlement poses security challenges for Palestinian residents of the city, who have allegedly already been targeted by settlers in nearby outposts.הסטוריה ביריחו! מהלך היסטורי של תנועת נחלה עם מועצת בנימין - משפחות יהודיות נכנסו לפני זמן קצר ל-8 בתים בעיר יריחו מתחת לארמונות החשמונאים לאחר שהבתים נרכשו בידי תנועת נחלה. https://t.co/SBGrG7eqmW— נחלה - תנועה להתיישבות (@T_Nachala) November 4, 2026On Thursday morning, the Palestinian Authority's WAFA news agency reported that settlers attacked Palestinians in Deir al-Dik al-Tahta, west of Jericho, wounding three people after spraying them with pepper spray and beating them.“Establishing a settlement inside Jericho poses a security threat and constitutes a geopolitical disaster that must not be allowed to happen.

This move is designed to deepen friction and violence, entrench an apartheid regime, and foreclose any possibility of a future political agreement. A settlement in Jericho will create additional flashpoints and trigger further violence, while dragging the military into unnecessary and life-threatening missions whose sole purpose is to protect a handful of messianic extremists bent on dragging Israel into the abyss,” Peace Now said in a statement.

“A caretaker government that has not received a mandate from the public has no authority to impose such far-reaching political and security realities on the ground. The IDF must, therefore, evacuate the new settlement in Jericho immediately.”

The outpost has also drawn criticism from the Palestinian Authority. Palestinian National Council head Rouhi Fattouh condemned what he described as Israeli citizens' “seizure” of the eight properties, claiming the move amounted to terrorism and would push the region and the world “towards more conflicts and violence by encouraging colonialism, confiscating land, and imposing displacement in blatant defiance of international law and signed agreements.”Palestinian law labels selling land to Jews as act of treasonNachala has rejected the characterization of the purchases as a seizure, .

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article cites WAFA for a separate attack but leaves out WAFA's report on this event: settlers smashed the doors and took over the homes while the owners were away. Without it, a reader believes the only dispute is over the paperwork of a purchase, not a forced entry into occupied homes.

How we know

However, Palestinian law treats the sale or lease of land to Israeli Jews as an act of treason, which can carry the death penalty.In 2019, a Nablus court sentenced a Palestinian man to five years in prison for attempting to sell land to Israeli Jews. In 2018, a Qalqilya court sentenced two Palestinian men to 15 years of hard labor for their involvement in a network seeking to transfer West Bank land to Israeli Jews.Daniella Weiss, the founder of the Nachala Movement, said, “These homes in Jericho mark the end of the Oslo Accords that caused so many casualties.

We are now… opening a new era.”Lital Slonim & Daniella Weiss from the Nachala Movement! A historic and exciting moment! Today, Jewish families moved into eight homes in Jericho, purchased by the Nachala Movement. Just as Am Yisrael returned to Hebron, today we have opened a new chapter in our return to Jericho, one of our most historic cities. Together, we are turning vision into reality! Am Yisrael Chai! — Israel Heritage Foundation (@IHF_Heritage) November 4, 2026Settlement and National Missions Minister Orit Strock said: “Settlement in Jericho is the continuation of the process of repairing the damage caused by Oslo.

Jericho is the lock of the Land of Israel. This is where the cursed Oslo Accords began, and now, we have reached this root and are making it bloom again.“The next step is returning to Gaza. On the eve of Shabbat Chayei Sarah, we can say that our forefather Abraham is very proud of his successors: those redeeming the land of Israel by paying its full price and settling it.”Notably, Jericho was the first city handed over to the PA in May 1994, following the signing of the Gaza-Jericho Agreement.Binyamin Regional Council head and Yesha Council chairman Israel Ganz said: “Thirty-two years after 'Gaza and Jericho first,' we proudly say: We have returned to Jericho!

Thank you to Daniella Weiss and the Nachala Movement for their determination and partnership, which turned the dream into reality, and to Minister Orit Strock, who came to strengthen the families on the very day they moved in. We will continue to build and settle the Land of Israel.”Combatants for Peace claims IDF escorted settlers into homesA representative from Combatants for Peace, an NGO promoting peace between Israelis and Palestinians, told The Jerusalem Post that the development was “particularly disturbing,” alleging that the IDF escorted the settlers into the homes.“This is especially jarring during the harvest season, when the Israeli authorities, led by the army and the Civil Administration, do everything in their power to prevent approximately 100,000 Palestinian families who depend on the olive crop from reaching their lands and harvesting their olives,” the CfP representative said.“The establishment of the outpost in Ein Diuk Thahta is another license for the terror of the settlers in the area, who in July-August repeatedly attacked the residents of the area and their property and even destroyed Palestinian homes.

This is another step by a government that deepens the occupation and its injustices, supports settler terror and fuels the fire in the region, and expands more and more settlements that are changing the face of the region in an attempt to thwart any possibility of a future peaceful political solution.”However, and “without permission.”“The acquisition process and the security implications derived from it are now being clarified by the relevant parties,” the military confirmed.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article ends on the army saying the entry was 'without permission', but omits that the army then diverted about three platoons of combat troops to secure the settlers. Without it, a reader believes the army opposed the takeover, when it is guarding the settlers in the homes.

How we know

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Jerusalem Post never says in its own voice that the new settlement near Jericho is illegal or that the West Bank is occupied, and it answers Nachala's claim of a legal purchase only with Palestinian land-sale law. It ends on the IOF's statement that the entry was 'without permission', presented as settling the escort claim. It leaves out WAFA's report that the doors were smashed while the owners were away, and Ynet's report that the army sent troops to guard the settlers.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “maintaining that it legally purchased the properties”

    Why this matters
    The Post gives Nachala's claim that it 'legally purchased the properties' and then answers it only with Palestinian land-sale law. It never gives the settlement's status under international law.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the only legal question is whether a private purchase was valid, and that the settlement may be lawful if the sale was.
    The context
    The International Court of Justice has found Israel's settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. In its own voice the article never says the new settlement is illegal. The only mention of international law is inside a Palestinian official's quote.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“Palestinian law treats the sale or lease of land to Israeli Jews as an act of treason”

    Show it in the article

    “which lies in Area A of the West Bank”

    Why this matters
    The Post places Jericho in 'Area A of the West Bank' and, in its own voice, never calls the territory occupied.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the West Bank as a neutral administrative map of Areas A and C, not territory under an unlawful occupation.
    The context
    The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank unlawful. Occupation appears in the article only inside an NGO's quotation.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Dozens of settlers took over eight homes in Ein Diouk al-Tahta, beside Jericho in the occupied West Bank, establishing a settlement that is illegal under international law, as the ICJ found in 2024.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “the IDF confirmed in a statement to the Post that entry into the homes was done without prior coordination with the military”

    Why this matters
    The Post opens this sentence with 'However' and says the IOF 'confirmed', so the army's statement reads as settling the question. Combatants for Peace's account is only 'alleging'.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the army had nothing to do with the takeover and that the claim of an army escort has been disproved.
    The context
    The army's statement denies prior coordination. It does not address whether troops escorted or protected the settlers. Ynet reported that the army diverted about three platoons of combat troops to secure the new residents.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The army said the entry was not coordinated with it, but did not address the claim that soldiers escorted the settlers; Ynet reported that troops were later diverted to secure them.

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article cites WAFA for a separate attack but leaves out WAFA's report on this event: settlers smashed the doors and took over the homes while the owners were away. Without it, a reader believes the only dispute is over the paperwork of a purchase, not a forced entry into occupied homes.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  4. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    What is missing

    The article ends on the army saying the entry was 'without permission', but omits that the army then diverted about three platoons of combat troops to secure the settlers. Without it, a reader believes the army opposed the takeover, when it is guarding the settlers in the homes.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  5. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Israeli settlers move into eight homes”

    Why this matters
    The headline says settlers 'move into' the homes, taking up the settlers' description of a peaceful move after a purchase.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlers simply took up residence in homes they had bought.
    The context
    How the settlers took the homes is disputed. The PA's National Council head calls it a seizure. WAFA, cited by Anadolu, reported that the settlers smashed the doors and took over the homes while their owners were away.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 5 NovYesha Council leader urges Argentina’s Milei to oppose West Bank sanctions at Casa Rosada meeting6.0
  2. 5 NovSecret Oslo negotiations revealed as Norway releases thousands of previously hidden documents0.0
  3. 5 NovHerzog warns Israeli leadership of escalating violence in West Bank, says it may lead to civil war3.0
  4. 5 NovPalestinian teacher arrested in West Bank over posts praising terrorists, October 7 attack6.0
  5. 3 NovIsraeli ex-generals condemn extremist settler violence, help Palestinian farmers 6.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post