Daily Star, on Iran, 7 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Piers Morgan mocks US over $20m reward for details on Iran's nuclear programme

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The US Department of State has put up an enormous reward for anyone willing to spill the beans on Iran's nuclear programme, with broadcaster Piers Morgan offering a blunt reaction. The Rewards for Justice scheme is dangling a staggering sum of up to $20 million for credible intelligence about the nuclear programme , covering its facilities, equipment and key personnel, as well as information about the scientific community. Potential relocation is also being offered as part of the package.

"In 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity, a level that is a short technical step from the 90 percent required for a nuclear weapon," the statement read. "Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state to produce uranium at such a high enrichment level. Experts estimate this quantity, if enriched further, could be enough for several nuclear weapons." The life-altering sum has been offered to ordinary members of the public.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article quotes the US statement at length on enrichment levels, a 'short technical step' from weapons grade and 'several nuclear weapons', and never says that Iran insists its programme is peaceful and denies seeking a weapon. Without it a reader takes the US account as the only one, with no response from Iran.

How we know

Iran's nuclear ambitions have long been a thorn in America's side, with President Donald Trump repeatedly citing them as justification for his nation's military campaign against the Middle Eastern country. The US and Israel launched co-ordinated strikes on several critical Iranian sites at the end of February. Iran hit back by shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20% of the world's oil supply had previously flowed before the conflict erupted.

The fallout has been catastrophic: global oil markets were sent into turmoil, air travel across the region was thrown into chaos and . The US Central Command announced the reward in a post on social media platform X. The announcement sparked fierce criticism, with Piers Morgan responding with a brief message: "WTF????". One X user echoed Mr Morgan's reaction: "Hahah they don't even know the location of Iran's nuclear program.

This is so embarrassing." Another X user remarked: "So you have started a war to "dismantle" a nuclear program you know nothing about? ? Because it doesn't exist." While a third observed: "Looks like Iran did a good job ridding itself of your agents. Now you're resorting to begging online." Another added: "I thought they destroyed it like 4 times already lol".

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Star reports the US $20m reward for information on Iran's nuclear programme and Piers Morgan's mocking reply. It runs the State Department's enrichment claims in full and never gives Iran's position that its programme is peaceful, which LBC reported on the same story. It also writes the war's dead as 'lives have been lost', a line of fallout beside oil prices and air travel, with no word for killing.

  1. Writes the death out

    Serious

    “thousands of lives have been lost”

    Why this matters
    The words 'thousands of lives have been lost' list the dead as one item of 'fallout', next to oil markets and air travel. The sentence has no word for killing and no actor.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the deaths as a general consequence of a crisis, on a par with market turmoil, and not as people killed in a war that began with named strikes.
    The context
    Two sentences earlier the article says the war began when the US and Israel launched strikes on Iranian sites. The article never says anyone was killed or by whom, even though it names the side that opened the war.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The US and Israel launched co-ordinated strikes on several critical Iranian sites”
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “killed”.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The war that began with US and Israeli strikes in February has killed thousands of people, sent global oil markets into turmoil and disrupted air travel across the region.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article quotes the US statement at length on enrichment levels, a 'short technical step' from weapons grade and 'several nuclear weapons', and never says that Iran insists its programme is peaceful and denies seeking a weapon. Without it a reader takes the US account as the only one, with no response from Iran.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 7 NovTerrorist sleeper cells 'primed to blast US back to the Stone Age' if Trump nukes Iran6.0
  2. 4 NovControversial Trump prison cell billboard in Iran ends with 'US President executed' 3.0
  3. 4 NovDefiant Trump vows he'd 'do it again' as Iran backlash grows and MAGA empire implodes0.0
  4. 3 NovIran prepares for nuclear strikes as 'insane' Trump at edge of 'catastrophe'6.0
  5. 3 NovTrump launches 'secret bombing campaign’ on Iran hours before his fate is decided6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star