The New York Times, on Climate, 13 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Timing of Climate Science Reports Ignites a Hot Fight at U.N. Talks

No framing issues found.

A squabble over the publication timetable for several climate reports has turned into one of the burning issues of this year’s United Nations climate conference, as some warn that fossil fuel interests might be interfering with the world’s pre-eminent climate science organization. The U.N.-backed Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produces landmark reports that generally come out every five to seven years. The next round of reports would take on topics like physical changes to the earth and greenhouse gas emissions.

Timing is critical because in 2028 nations are supposed to assess their progress and then ramp up their efforts to do more, based on the best science. That process, known as a stocktake and occurring every five years, is the engine of the Paris Agreement. Saudi Arabia, India and Russia are among those pushing to delay the reports so that at least two of them come out after 2028. The fact that those nations rank among the largest fossil fuel exporters or importers has led to accusations that coal, oil and gas interests might be interfering with science.

“Saudi Arabia is trying to destroy the I.P.C.C. in order to prevent the next global stocktake from using the accurate scientific data on fossil fuels,” said former Vice President Al Gore, who is in Turkey for the talks. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports a dispute at COP31 in Turkey over the timing of the next IPCC reports, naming Saudi Arabia, India and Russia among those pushing for at least two of the reports to come out after the 2028 stocktake, and quoting Al Gore's accusation against Saudi Arabia. The supplied text breaks off after the eighth sentence into paywall messages, so only the opening can be judged. Nothing in that opening misleads: the headline matches the body, and the interference charge is attributed rather than stated as fact.

What it gets right

  • “Saudi Arabia, India and Russia are among those pushing to delay the reports so that at least two of them come out after 2028.”

    The article names the states pushing for delay and says plainly what the delay would achieve: reports landing after the 2028 stocktake.

  • “in 2028 nations are supposed to assess their progress and then ramp up their efforts to do more, based on the best science”

    The article explains why the timing matters, so a reader can see what is at stake in what might otherwise look like a procedural row.

  • “has led to accusations that coal, oil and gas interests might be interfering with science”

    The article presents interference as an accusation, not as an established fact. It links the accusation to a stated fact: these nations rank among the largest fossil fuel exporters or importers.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 12 NovCalifornia Could Face 50-Foot Waves as Storms Slam Its Coast0.0
  2. 12 NovA Key Paris Agreement Goal Is Dead. What Now?0.0
  3. 12 NovStorm Charles Pummels Portugal and Disrupts Flights0.0
  4. 12 NovA Concerned Californian’s Guide to El Niño0.0
  5. 12 NovMalawi Lacks Money to Fund its El Niño Plans0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times