Daily Star, on Iran, 7 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

'primed to blast US back to the Stone Age' if Trump nukes Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

could blast the nation back into the "Stone Age" if Donald Trump unleashes a nuclear weapon on Iran, a former FBI agent has warned. Fears of an apocalyptic showdown have surged after Trump reportedly weighed up a potential strike on Iran's heavily fortified underground nuclear sites. Iranian state TV has even broadcast chilling drill alerts to terrified locals, warning: "If the US targets Mount Kalang near the Natanz facility with a nuclear bomb, the danger could reach the surrounding areas."

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the US has been at war with Iran since February, or that the Trump administration had just resumed strikes on Iran. The Daily Star reported the war itself three days earlier, and the Mirror reported the renewed strikes the same day. Without this the reader takes the nuclear threat as a sudden hypothetical, and sees 'retaliation' and Iran's shelter warnings as coming out of nowhere rather than from eight months of US attacks.

How we know

The prospect of atomic warfare has sparked red alerts from security chiefs. Chris Swecker, an FBI veteran with 24 years at the bureau, warned that retaliatory strikes could see sleeper agents sabotage vital infrastructure back at home. He told the Daily Mail: "I think the most realistic retaliation is that the many Hezbollah cells that are here in the United States already actually take matters into their own hands. They have that capability and they can conduct terrorist attacks here."

Swecker, boasting 45 years in law enforcement, said the retaliation could strike power grids, energy plants, or cripple the global economy through digital warfare. "We face a cyber threat, we face the physical threat. And if the financial system were to be compromised or shut down, it wouldn't take a nuclear missile, it could be done via cyber means," Swecker said. "Or they cut an underground cable that runs under the ocean. We'd be back in the Stone Age for a while."

He added that sabotaging essential services would spark mass panic: "You could put one city and render it back in the Stone Age by taking out the power grid or financial system. That would create huge panic in this country." Former CIA operative John Kiriakou also claimed Trump's team is actively looking into a tactical nuclear hit. "I've heard the same thing from my own contacts at the White House, that the President is considering the use of a tactical nuclear weapon against Pickaxe Mountain so it will penetrate to the point that it will destroy everything that's underground," Kiriakou said on Piers Morgan Uncensored.

While Iran does not have the missile reach to hit the American mainland directly, Swecker cautioned that Western targets abroad and the home front remain in the crosshairs. "We can't discount the possibility that someone pushes the button," Swecker said. "That's one of the reasons that we couldn't have Iran with full nuclear capabilities, because ."

Meanwhile, Iranian officials in Isfahan have told locals to hide in windowless basements, scrub off radioactive fallout and stay bunkered down for at least 24 hours if the bombs drop. However, . He said: " They want to put fear into them."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

The Daily Star's headline states 'Terrorist sleeper cells' as fact, dropping the body's attribution to one former FBI agent, and its opening line takes his claim about cells on US soil into its own narration. It reports Iranian officials' shelter advice about a possible US nuclear strike, then gives Chris Swecker the last word dismissing it as manipulation, with no Iranian voice set against two former US officials. It also never mentions that the US has been at war with Iran since February.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Terrorist sleeper cells”

    Why this matters
    The headline states 'Terrorist sleeper cells' as fact, with no attribution to anyone.
    The impression it gives
    It is established that terrorist sleeper cells are in place in the US and ready to strike.
    The context
    The body gives this as the warning of one former FBI agent speaking to another newspaper. The headline drops that attribution.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a former FBI agent has warned”
    • Elsewhere in the article“He told the Daily Mail”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Former FBI agent warns Hezbollah cells could attack US infrastructure if Trump uses a nuclear weapon on Iran

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “Swecker dismissed Tehran's survival broadcasts as psychological warfare”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Star closes the article on Swecker calling Iranian civil defence warnings 'psychological warfare', with nothing set against it.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's warnings to its people about a possible nuclear strike are a manipulation trick, not a response to a real danger.
    The context
    The article itself reports that Trump weighed a strike on Iran's nuclear sites and that a former CIA officer heard Trump was considering a tactical nuclear weapon. The Mirror reported the same day that the US had resumed strikes on Iran. The danger the broadcasts describe is the one the article reports.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “This is just part and parcel of how they subjugate and manipulate their population.”

    Why this matters
    This quote ends the piece by casting the shelter advice as a tool to 'subjugate and manipulate' Iranians.
    The impression it gives
    Telling civilians to shelter from fallout is control, not protection.
    The context
    The advice reported in the article (basements, washing off fallout, staying inside) is civil defence against the US nuclear strike the article itself says was under discussion. No Iranian official or independent voice is given space to answer.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“told locals to hide in windowless basements, scrub off radioactive fallout”

    Show it in the article

  3. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “Undercover terror cells lurking on US soil”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Star writes 'Undercover terror cells lurking on US soil' in its own narration, as the premise of the sentence. Only the possible attack is hung on the former agent.
    The impression it gives
    The presence of hidden terror cells in the US is an established fact, and only their next move is in doubt.
    The context
    The only basis in the article is Swecker's own claim about 'the many Hezbollah cells' in the US. The article offers no other source for it.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the many Hezbollah cells that are here in the United States already”

    Show it in the article

  4. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “they're not responsible, they're religious fanatics, and their goal is to basically subjugate Western civilization, eliminate Western civilisation”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Star gives Swecker this sweeping verdict on Iran's goals and lets it stand with no response.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's aim of destroying Western civilisation is an expert's settled finding.
    The context
    Two former US officials fill the article from S5 to the end. No Iranian official, analyst or other voice answers these claims. Iran appears only through civil defence broadcasts, which the article then lets Swecker dismiss.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Chris Swecker, an FBI veteran with 24 years at the bureau”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Former CIA operative John Kiriakou also claimed”

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the US has been at war with Iran since February, or that the Trump administration had just resumed strikes on Iran. The Daily Star reported the war itself three days earlier, and the Mirror reported the renewed strikes the same day. Without this the reader takes the nuclear threat as a sudden hypothetical, and sees 'retaliation' and Iran's shelter warnings as coming out of nowhere rather than from eight months of US attacks.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 7 NovPiers Morgan mocks US over $20m reward for details on Iran's nuclear programme6.0
  2. 4 NovControversial Trump prison cell billboard in Iran ends with 'US President executed' 3.0
  3. 4 NovDefiant Trump vows he'd 'do it again' as Iran backlash grows and MAGA empire implodes0.0
  4. 3 NovIran prepares for nuclear strikes as 'insane' Trump at edge of 'catastrophe'6.0
  5. 3 NovTrump launches 'secret bombing campaign’ on Iran hours before his fate is decided6.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star