Reuters, on Lebanon, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Hezbollah with funds from Iran, sources say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

A Hezbollah flag is seen on the rubble of a damaged apartment building in the aftermath of an Israeli strike, amid the ongoing hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, in Tayouneh,... Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab Read more Summary Hezbollah receives tens of millions of dollars from Iran to rearm, Lebanese sources say Group focuses on procuring explosives and producing drones for attacks on Israeli positions Hezbollah still needs to repair command-and-control structures damaged in key battles BEIRUT, Oct 26 (Reuters) - Lebanese armed group Hezbollah has spent three months preparing for a ​possible resumption of hostilities with Israel, after receiving an infusion of cash from Iran, according to Lebanese security personnel briefed on its activities.

The ‌group, founded by Iran's Revolutionary Guards in 1982, has been dealt severe blows in two wars with Israel since 2024, with thousands of fighters and many of its leaders killed, and much of its arsenal destroyed. Sign up here. Invading Israeli forces now occupy in southern Lebanon, and political pressure has built up in Beirut for its disarmament. It nevertheless remains committed to fighting Israel ​and has used to rearm, with a focus on procuring explosives and producing drones that can be flown ​into Israeli positions, two Lebanese security sources told Reuters.

One of the sources, and another close to Hezbollah, said the group had ⁠received tens of millions of dollars from Iran to help boost its military capabilities. That is in addition to around $200 million that the group received from Tehran to ​aid displaced families in , which Reuters reported earlier this month. The group has been restoring command-and-control structures that broke down in key battles, according to one ​of those sources and three other security officials familiar with the group's operations.

In response to questions from Reuters, Hezbollah's media office said Israel's occupation of Lebanese land made any resistance to it a legitimate right. It rejected the suggestion that its command-and-control systems had broken down. Israel's military declined to comment. Iran's permanent mission to the United Nations in Geneva did not immediately respond to ​Reuters questions. A US State Department spokesman said Washington would keep strangling Hezbollah's finances through sanctions and other measures.

A US Treasury spokesperson said Iran was running out ​of money and ways to move money. HEZBOLLAH ON ALERT Hezbollah's effort comes amid in the wider Middle Eastern conflict ignited by the US-Israeli attack on Iran in February. Hezbollah opened fire ‌in support ⁠of Iran on March 2, triggering an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population, mostly members of Hezbollah's Shi'ite Muslim constituency.

Hostilities largely abated over the summer as an interim Iran-US deal included a Lebanon ceasefire and Washington mediated talks between Lebanon and Israel. Full-scale hostilities have not resumed in Lebanon despite the collapse of the US-Iranian deal, though Israel continues deadly strikes in the south. Hezbollah is on alert for a possible US-Iran escalation, potentially reigniting the Lebanon front. The ​sources told Reuters the group had not ​yet managed to fully prepare its ⁠stockpiles or fighting force.

Hezbollah is still restocking, acknowledging this month that explosives seized by Lebanese authorities belonged to it and were intended for use against Israel. A Hezbollah official and a Lebanese security source told Reuters they were specifically for its explosive drones. ISRAEL'S ​REMOTE WARFARE PROVED A CHALLENGE, SOURCES SAY The group will also need to repair command-and-control capabilities after losses on key fronts, ​including the flashpoint town ⁠of Bint Jbeil and the strategic Ali al-Taher ridge, according to one of the Lebanese sources and three security officials.

They said Hezbollah's tactic of operating in small units and rationing the use of anti-tank rockets left some units isolated on those fronts, struggling to confront Israel's remotely operated systems including weaponized drones and armed remote-controlled vehicles. The Israeli military told Reuters it ⁠uses remotely-operated ​systems to monitor southern Lebanon and reduce troops' threat exposure. Hezbollah has not explicitly said whether it would ​take part in the eruption of fresh hostilities, but its media office said it was wary of giving Israeli leaders any justification to escalate in Lebanon, particularly as the group was concerned about its ​constituents being displaced once more.

Additional reporting by Steven Scheer and Pesha Magid in Jerusalem, Olivia Le Poidevin in Geneva Writing by Maya Gebeily and Tom Perry Editing by Peter Graff Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab Suggested Topics: Middle East X Facebook Linkedin Email Link Purchase Licensing Rights Maya Gebeily Thomson Reuters Reuters bureau chief for Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. Email

Read the original article on reuters.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Reuters reports anonymous Lebanese sources saying Iran has funded Hezbollah to rearm. It names Israel as the actor that invaded, occupies the south and killed more than 4,000 people. Its faults are small: the headline turns a possible resumption of hostilities into Hezbollah readying a new regional war, the article calls the period of continued Israeli strikes 'tensions' and a 'lull', and it calls Shi'ite villages Hezbollah's own.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “readies for new regional war”

    Why this matters
    The headline says Hezbollah 'readies for new regional war', making the group the party preparing to start a fresh war across the region.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Hezbollah is gearing up to launch a new regional war.
    The context
    The body says the group is preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities, has not decided whether to take part, and is wary of giving Israel a reason to escalate. It also reports that Israel is still occupying the south and carrying out deadly strikes, so the war is not new.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Sanitises violence or disorder

    Minor

    “continued tensions”

    Why this matters
    Reuters calls the present situation 'continued tensions' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the region is tense but no one is being attacked.
    The context
    The article's own later sentences say Israel continues deadly strikes in the south and invading Israeli forces occupy southern villages.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Israel continues deadly strikes in the south”
    • Elsewhere in the article“Invading Israeli forces now occupy”

    Show it in the article

    “a lull in hostilities since June”

    Why this matters
    The phrase 'a lull in hostilities' describes the months since June as a pause, so the only active party in the sentence is Hezbollah rearming.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the fighting stopped in June and Hezbollah is using the quiet to prepare.
    The context
    Israeli strikes and attacks have continued throughout, as the article itself and other reports say.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “its Shi'ite heartlands”

    Why this matters
    Reuters calls the areas where Shi'ite Lebanese live Hezbollah's 'Shi'ite heartlands' in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Shi'ite areas and the families displaced from them belong to the armed group.
    The context
    The people receiving aid are displaced civilian families. Elsewhere the article describes them more carefully as the group's political 'constituency', a description that does not make them part of the armed group.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“mostly members of Hezbollah's Shi'ite Muslim constituency”

    Show it in the article

    “its heartland of villages”

    Why this matters
    Reuters calls the villages of southern Lebanon Hezbollah's 'heartland', so civilian villages read as the armed group's territory.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the occupied villages are Hezbollah positions rather than Lebanese towns with civilian residents.
    The context
    These are Lebanese villages whose residents were uprooted. The article itself says the displaced were a quarter of Lebanon's population.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “triggering an Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people”

    Reuters names Israel as the party that did the killing. The Jerusalem Post's version of the same story rewrote this as an Israeli 'response' that led to people 'being evacuated'.

  • “Invading Israeli forces now occupy its heartland of villages in southern Lebanon”

    Reuters calls Israel's presence in the south an invasion and an occupation in its own voice.

  • “Israel continues deadly strikes in the south”

    Reuters names Israel as the party still striking and says the strikes kill.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Reuters

  1. 17 OctLebanon says military delegation will press for halt to Israeli attacks at US talks3.0
  2. 15 OctRubio urges Lebanon to not return confiscated explosives to Hezbollah, US official says3.0
  3. 15 OctHezbollah says it owned confiscated explosives, meant to attack Israel3.0
  4. 14 OctUN peacekeeping chief says talks on future of Lebanon mission must begin soon3.0
  5. 13 OctHezbollah outlines financial aid plan for Lebanese with destroyed homes3.0

Everything we scored from Reuters