The New York Times, on Targeting, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Strong Showing May Bring Role in Formation of Israel’s Next Government

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

One of the most striking results from the election in Israel on Tuesday is the unusually strong showing by two leading Arab parties, whose voters turned out in record numbers to express their opposition to the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The final results have not been announced, but a range of exit polls conducted by Israeli broadcasters suggest that two of the parties — the socially conservative United Arab List, or Raam, and the left-wing Joint List — may have won a historically large number of seats in parliament and an important role in the formation of the country’s next government.

Mansour Abbas, the leader of Raam, told a television interviewer that the turnout showed that Arab voters, who make up about 20 percent of Israel’s population, had channeled their “frustration and despair” into “hope.” He said he wanted to replace Mr. Netanyahu’s government “in every possible way” and that his first priority was to “ensure that there is a chance of forming a government” that achieved that goal. The Arab parties’ strong showing may make them kingmakers.

But building a governing coalition with Arab participation remains a fraught exercise in Israel. Many Israeli Jews believe that a parliamentary majority should not rely on the support of Arab lawmakers. Arab citizens make up about 20 percent of Israel’s population, and most are the descendants of Palestinians who remained in their homes during the 1948 Arab-Israel war at the time of Israel’s independence. Today, they mostly live in separate towns from Jewish Israelis and face violence and discriminatory housing policies.

Over the decades, disagreements, including over Israel’s nature as Jewish state, have led many Arab voters to avoid the ballot box. This week, many Arab voters said they were furious at Mr. Netanyahu for his treatment of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and for policies that they feel treat Palestinians in Israel as second-class citizens. Indeed, throughout the campaign, Mr. Netanyahu made overt appeals to anti-Arab prejudice.

Of the two Arab parties that did well on Tuesday, only Raam has joined a coalition government in the past. That happened in 2021, when it joined the short-lived anti-Netanyahu coalition of Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. Raam’s participation in that government outraged many right-wing Jewish voters, and when it collapsed after roughly one year, they backed Mr. Netanyahu, who went on to form the most hard-line government in Israel’s history.

That government now faces the possibility that it may be brought down by an election result that has been deeply shaped by .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The New York Times reports record turnout by Arab citizens of Israel and the possible kingmaker role of the parties they back. In its own voice it uses Arab-only labels in the headline and closing line, and it links these citizens to Palestinians mainly through ancestry. It does refer to Palestinians in Israel elsewhere and reports discrimination and Netanyahu's anti-Arab appeals plainly.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Minor

    “Arab Parties’”

    Why this matters
    The headline names the parties and their voters only as "Arab Parties". The Joint List's own name, given in S2, contains no such label.
    The impression it gives
    A reader of the headline believes the election story is about an ethnic Arab minority inside Israel, with no national identity of its own.
    The context
    Survey evidence shows most Arab citizens of Israel describe themselves as Palestinian. The article itself later refers to "Palestinians in Israel", but the headline keeps only the Arab-only label.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • Elsewhere in the article“treat Palestinians in Israel as second-class citizens”

    Show it in the article

    “robust Arab turnout”

    Why this matters
    The closing sentence credits the possible fall of Netanyahu's government to "robust Arab turnout". This repeats the Arab-only label at the article's conclusion.
    The impression it gives
    The reader finishes the article understanding the decisive voters as an Arab ethnic bloc.
    The context
    S13 shows the voters themselves framed their anger around the treatment of Palestinians, in Gaza, the West Bank and inside Israel. The supplied survey evidence shows most identify as Palestinian.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“his treatment of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza”
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

Everything we scored from The New York Times

See how 590 outlets covered this story