The Jerusalem Post, on Targeting, 26 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Agudat Yisrael support, , or new elections: Post-vote scenarios facing Israel

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Agudat Yisrael, the three-MK haredi faction led by Yitzhak Goldknopf, could provide some form of support for a government led by a member of the opposition, according to assessments within the political establishment ahead of the elections.With less than a day remaining before the vote begins, political figures are considering several possible scenarios, including or holding another election.

Another possibility being discussed is support from Agudat Yisrael in exchange for budgetary agreements, although even such an arrangement would not necessarily eliminate .

The possibility of cooperation between Agudat Yisrael and the change bloc is not new. Maariv reported in August that Agudat Yisrael was examining new political options, including potential cooperation with Gadi Eisenkot.The discussions took place against the backdrop of tensions within United Torah Judaism, particularly disagreements between Agudat Yisrael and Degel Hatorah over the haredi military draft and relations with Netanyahu.According to that report, while Agudat Yisrael expressed disappointment with the coalition's conduct, Degel Hatorah conveyed messages of despair and a lack of confidence in Netanyahu and his government.A letter from Rabbi Dov Lando, expressing reservations about maintaining the commitment to the political bloc led by Netanyahu, further deepened uncertainty surrounding relations between the haredi parties and Likud.Goldknopf, however, faces a significant political obstacle.

His voter base is largely identified with the Right, and according to assessments cited in the report, any indication that he would be willing to support a government led by parties from the change bloc could prompt some of his supporters to defect to Likud or Otzma Yehudit.Is Bennett the only politician who could reshape the political blocs?Beyond the possibility of haredi support, political figures are also examining a scenario in which former prime minister Naftali Bennett could determine the composition of the next government if neither bloc secures a majority sufficient to form a coalition.One possibility being raised within the political establishment is that Bennett could join a government led by Netanyahu if neither bloc reaches the 61-seat threshold required for a Knesset majority.Although this is considered a remote scenario, some believe Bennett is the only leader within the change bloc capable of making such a move, given his political background on the Right.Such a decision, however, would require Bennett to change his political support base and would also be complicated by the composition of his current party.Liberman disagreements with Netanyahu make relationship unlikelyThe possibility of Avigdor Liberman taking a similar step has also been raised, particularly in light of his previous decision to join a Netanyahu-led government and serve as defense minister.However, according to the assessment presented, Liberman is currently far from making such a move because of the personal and political disagreements between him and the prime minister.Thus, alongside the possibility of securing outside support from haredi parties, the question of which politician might be willing to shift their political support base could become one of the central issues in coalition negotiations.For now, these remain scenarios and political assessments rather than agreements reached between the parties.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post sets out coalition scenarios ahead of Israel's election and reports them mostly with clear attribution to political assessments. In its own voice, in the headline and twice in the body, it calls the parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel only "Arab parties" and never names them as Palestinian, so a reader is not told who these voters and parties are.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    The headline names one of three outcomes as "Arab parties", an Arab-only label in the outlet's own voice for the parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these parties as an ethnic bloc inside Israeli politics with no tie to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    Survey evidence shows a majority of these citizens describe themselves with the word Palestinian. The article never uses the word anywhere, so the headline's label is the only identity the reader is given.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “forming a government with the support of Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    The opening paragraph repeats the label when it first describes this scenario, presenting the parties only by an ethnic description.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the choice is between haredi support and support from an unnamed Arab group, with no sense that the parties represent Palestinian citizens of Israel.
    The context
    Arab and Palestinian identities coexist, and the evidence shows most of these citizens include Palestinian in how they describe themselves. The article gives no party name and no other identity to set beside the label.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

    Show it in the article

    “the need for votes from the Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses the label a third time when it discusses the parties' votes as a need that might be eliminated, again with no name or identity attached.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees these parties only as votes to be avoided, cut off from the people they represent.
    The context
    The parties represent Palestinian citizens of Israel, most of whom describe themselves as Palestinian according to the survey evidence. The article never says so anywhere.

    How we know

    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Elsewhere in the article“forming a government with the support of Arab parties”

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post

See how 316 outlets covered this story