LBC, on UK Politics, 6 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Treasury secretary blasts 'unfair' practice of firms not listing salary on job adverts, as Burnham moves to introduce

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Treasury secretary James Murray has blasted the "unfair" practice of firms not listing salary on job adverts, as the Government moves to make it law for businesses to include pay information. Andy Burnham has said employers will be made to say how much they are prepared to pay new hires. Legislation is expected to be brought forward, requiring employers to include salary information in their job adverts. Research by the CIPD (Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development) has previously found 41 per cent of employers always included salary information in their job adverts.

Around 27 per cent of employers never included salary information, according to the 2023 survey of 832 decision-makers who have hiring responsibilities. Read more: Employers will be forced to tell applicants expected salaries, as equalities secretary tells LBC move will help close gender pay gap Read more: King Charles is 'fully open' to Commonwealth realms removing him as head of state "It is unfair," Paymaster General James Murray told Nick Ferrari, adding that the Government wants to make it common practice among businesses.

"When people are looking for job adverts and deciding what to apply for, it shouldn't be a guessing game about what the pay is. "It can be really frustrating for people applying for jobs when they don't know what the pay on offer is. "It can discourage young people from applying for jobs when they can't see a wage or a salary or even a pay range, and it also contributes to the gender pay gap as well." Labour ministers have faced criticism for their handling of the jobs market, with 13 per cent of 16 to 24-year-olds not in education, employment or training (Neet) in April to June this year.

Earlier in the year, between January and March, the number of Neets aged 16-24 topped a million for the first time since 2013. A review into young people and work, carried out by former Labour health secretary Alan Milburn, is due to conclude later this month. In the wider jobs market, the number of vacancies fell by an estimated 21,000, to 691,000, in the three months to September, data from the Office for National Statistics shows. Mr Murray told LBC that listing salaries will level the playing field between men and women in the workplace, as it will help women know whether their male colleagues are earning more.

He said: "Let's say a man and a woman are both applying for the same job and there is a gender pay gap already in existence, if the employer says, 'what's your current salary?', it perpetuates that pay gap, rather than having a level playing field of having a salary or a pay range being put forward on the job advert itself."

Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

LBC reports the Government's plan to make employers list salaries on job adverts, quoting Paymaster General James Murray and attributing his view that the current practice is unfair. It gives the base and date for the CIPD survey figures. The only flaw is minor: the headline puts a 'say what you pay' slogan in quotation marks that nobody in the article actually says.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “'say what you pay' law”

    Why this matters
    LBC puts the phrase 'say what you pay' in quotation marks in the headline, as if someone used it to describe the law.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes 'say what you pay' as a quoted slogan from Andy Burnham or the Government.
    The context
    No one in the body uses those words. The article reports that employers will be made to say how much they are prepared to pay, but never quotes a 'say what you pay' phrase. The quotation marks attach words to nobody. The policy itself is described accurately, so the reader is not misled about what it does.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“employers will be made to say how much they are prepared to pay new hires”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “according to the 2023 survey of 832 decision-makers who have hiring responsibilities”

    LBC gives the source, the year and the sample size of the CIPD figures, so a reader can judge how far the numbers go.

  • “"It is unfair," Paymaster General James Murray told Nick Ferrari”

    The judgement that the practice is unfair is attributed to the minister who made it, not stated in LBC's own voice.

  • “has blasted the "unfair" practice”

    The opening keeps 'unfair' in quotation marks as Murray's word, carrying the attribution through from the headline.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from LBC

  1. 6 NovLondon Tube drivers to go on series of strikes across three months in row over four-day working week6.0
  2. 6 NovBurnham’s EU love-in leaves British students at the back of the queue0.0
  3. 6 NovBosses will be forced to include salary on job adverts in new 'say what you pay' law0.0
  4. 6 NovPolicing needs urgent reform or risks 'inevitable decline', Met chief to warn0.0
  5. 6 NovBritain is spending £2.4 billion on military satellites, but who really controls them?0.0

Everything we scored from LBC