The New York Times, on Climate, 14 November 2026

0.0out of 10Nothing found

Political Winds Changed in New Jersey. Could That Mean Wind Farms?

No framing issues found.

Few politicians claim more credit for the dismantling of the offshore wind industry in the Northeast than Representative Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey. So the unseating of Mr. Van Drew in the recent midterm elections gave new hope to some advocates of renewable energy for the revival of massive wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean that had been scuttled by the Trump administration before they could be built. The question now is whether the ambitious plans that New Jersey, New York and other states had for developing fields of giant turbines to turn coastal winds into electricity will ever be resurrected.

For proponents of renewable energy, the narrow victory for Mr. Van Drew’s Democratic opponent, Zack Mullock , was a “pleasant surprise,” said Anjuli Ramos-Busot, director of the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club. Mr. Van Drew was not solely responsible for short-circuiting the offshore wind industry’s progress, but “he had a lot to do with it,” she said. Mr. Van Drew, a Democrat turned Republican who morphed into one of Mr. Trump’s most loyal supporters, claimed that he had been instrumental in drafting a sweeping executive order signed by Mr. Trump on the first day of his second term that halted all permitting of wind projects in federal waters.

Mr. Van Drew said this week that he intended to continue to oppose offshore wind “in any way I can,” while he contemplates running again in 2028. “They’re very, very expensive” and “bad for the environment,” he said. We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
About this analysis

The New York Times reports that Representative Jeff Van Drew, who claims credit for helping halt offshore wind permitting, lost his seat, and asks whether New Jersey's and New York's wind farm plans could be revived. The retrieved text stops after Mr. Van Drew's quoted objections, so only the opening is available to assess. Nothing in that portion misleads: the Times names the Trump administration as the actor and attributes Mr. Van Drew's claims to him.

What it gets right

  • “that had been scuttled by the Trump administration before they could be built”

    The Times names who stopped the wind farms rather than writing that the projects simply stalled or were cancelled.

  • “claimed that he had been instrumental in drafting a sweeping executive order”

    The Times attributes Mr. Van Drew's account of his own role to him as a claim. It does not state that role as established fact.

  • ““They’re very, very expensive” and “bad for the environment,” he said.”

    The Times keeps Mr. Van Drew's case against offshore wind in quotation marks as his own words. It does not adopt that view in its own voice.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 14 NovMy Condo Wants Charging Spots for Electric Cars. How Do We Add Them Fairly?0.0
  2. 13 NovTiming of Climate Science Reports Ignites a Hot Fight at U.N. Talks0.0
  3. 12 NovCalifornia Could Face 50-Foot Waves as Storms Slam Its Coast0.0
  4. 12 NovA Key Paris Agreement Goal Is Dead. What Now?0.0
  5. 12 NovStorm Charles Pummels Portugal and Disrupts Flights0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times