The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 27 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Tensions continue to mount as Iraq balances the Iran border crossing closures with national needs

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Iraqi Prime Minister Ali Al-Zaidi is caught between the need to restrict arms and drug trafficking through Iranian border crossings and the realities of an economy that has become dependent on cheap produce imported from the neighboring country, Dr. , told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.Authorities closed the al-Shib crossing last week as they upgraded security and detection equipment, an Iraqi official told Reuters on Wednesday.

However, Kurdistan Democratic Party lawmaker Salwan Taha Akreyi told Kurdistan24 that Baghdad had shut the crossing at Washington's request to restrict transit to and from Iran and thwart Tehran's efforts to strengthen its militias in Iraq.Speaking a day after Baghdad's Third Karkh Investigative Court issued an arrest warrant for Maysan Provincial Council Chairman Mustafa Da'ir, following a complaint by Zaidi's office over threats of civil disobedience if the crossing remained closed, Zeidel said the “lone expression of dissatisfaction” reflected broader discontent.Da'ir gave Baghdad until Thursday to open the crossing, threatening unrest and warning that he would cut the province off from the rest of the country if his demands went unmetThe country's reliance on cheap shipments from Iran has led residents to neglect local agriculture, and they have become reliant, he said, adding that some who benefit from the transit of criminal goods have a “vested interest” in seeing it reopened swiftly.Iraq governorate benefits from Iran border crossing“Many people in this governorate, particularly those who work in the local administration, benefit from the border crossing.

They earn a lot of money from smuggling all kinds of merchandise, especially drugs, arms, and other goods,” he said.“They have a vested interest in keeping the border crossing open at all times. That is why there were so few demonstrations protesting its closure, and why he says what he says. He does not represent the entire population, but rather a certain segment of local society, particularly, I think, his tribe, which benefits from the border crossing.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The outlet reported a day earlier that a major Shia political bloc, Badr, rejected the prime minister's call for an investigation because the closure was harming the region's economy. It also reported that dozens of protesters blocked roads to oil companies over the closure. This article instead lets its analyst call Da'ir's stance a "lone expression of dissatisfaction" and say there were "so few demonstrations". Without the earlier facts, a reader believes the opposition is a narrow, smuggling-driven interest.

How we know

That explains his position.”It is understood that Da'ir comes from the Muhammedawi tribe, one of the most powerful Arab Shia tribes in Iraq., Zeidel acknowledged that Baghdad would find it “difficult” to maintain it in the long term. He explained that rising prices from the loss of cheap Iranian goods, along with protests and pressure from Tehran, would make it increasingly difficult for Baghdad to sustain the closure.Strait of Hormuz blockade increases Iran reliance on land routesThe closure comes as the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz has increased Iran's reliance on land routes through neighboring Iraq and Pakistan for shipments, and the sanctions preventing Iranian flights from landing at the majority of airports have only added to Iran's frustrations, he said.

Tehran strongly condemned the closure of the crossing earlier this week, denying allegations that the al-Shib crossing had been used to traffic drugs and counterfeit currency.“The [closures] drive the Iranian leadership crazy,” Zeidel said, adding that in many ways closing Iran's access to Iraq had become more effective than airstrikes.In response to said frustrations, Zeidel said that Iran-backed militias were likely to escalate economic protests and, potentially, use Iraqi territory to attack Saudi Arabia to bring embarrassment to Baghdad.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Jerusalem Post builds its report on a single Israeli analyst and, in its own voice, presupposes "Iranian smuggling attempts" that Tehran denies. It also drops its own earlier reporting that the Badr bloc rejected the investigation and that protesters blocked roads over the closure, so the analyst's claim of a lone, narrow dissent goes unchallenged.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “Though the closure may thwart Iranian smuggling attempts”

    Why this matters
    In the outlet's own voice, "Iranian smuggling attempts" is written as an established fact. Only the closure's effect is hedged with "may".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Iran is behind smuggling through the al-Shib crossing.
    The context
    The smuggling charge is an allegation by Iraqi officials, and Tehran denies it. The article itself reports the denial. The official reason given for the closure was an equipment upgrade, not smuggling.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Zeidel said the closure could curb smuggling that Iraqi officials allege comes from Iran, a charge Tehran denies, but he acknowledged Baghdad would find it difficult to sustain.

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    What is missing

    The outlet reported a day earlier that a major Shia political bloc, Badr, rejected the prime minister's call for an investigation because the closure was harming the region's economy. It also reported that dozens of protesters blocked roads to oil companies over the closure. This article instead lets its analyst call Da'ir's stance a "lone expression of dissatisfaction" and say there were "so few demonstrations". Without the earlier facts, a reader believes the opposition is a narrow, smuggling-driven interest.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Ronen Zeidel, an Iraq researcher at the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University”

    Why this matters
    The outlet makes one Israeli analyst the sole interpretive voice across the piece. He explains Iraqi motives, Iranian frustrations and the likely moves of armed groups.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes a single Israeli academic's reading as the authoritative account of an Iraqi and Iranian dispute.
    The context
    Iran gets one clause of denial. Da'ir and the Iraqi blocs opposing the closure get no voice of their own, although other reporting carried Iranian officials' statements on the closure.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctMecca defense pact faces test as Saudi delegation arrives for high-stakes Iran talks - analysis6.0
  2. 26 OctIraqi PM orders investigation into provincial council threats over closed Iran border crossing3.0
  3. 26 OctTrump-Netanyahu team suited to removing Iran’s regime, Netanyahu adviser tells ‘Post’3.0
  4. 26 OctUS ready to strike Iran 'within 96 hours' of Trump's order, Israel pushes for joint attack - report3.0
  5. 26 OctHow purchases of sanctioned Iranian jet fuel were disguised by Myanmar 0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post