The Jerusalem Post, on Iran, 26 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump-Netanyahu team suited to removing Iran’s regime, Netanyahu adviser tells ‘Post’

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's foreign policy adviser, Ophir Falk, and said Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump were suited to achieving it, in written remarks to The Jerusalem Post ahead of Tuesday's Israeli election.“Removing the genocidal Ayatollah regime in Iran is in the best interests of America, Israel, and civilization,” Falk said. “The Trump-Netanyahu team has shown to be suited to do so.”Falk argued that the decisive question for voters was who would lead Israel during the final two years of Trump's presidency.“Who will best cooperate and coordinate with the President to finish the job in Iran and expand peace in the region?” he asked.Trump renewed his endorsement of Netanyahu on Sunday evening, urging Israelis to back him in the October 27 vote.“Vote for Bibi Netanyahu for Prime Minister; we have to finish the job that we started!”

Trump wrote on Truth Social.Falk contrasted that support with what he said were the preferences of Israel's adversaries.“Trump wants to work with Netanyahu,” he said. “At the same time, Israel's enemies – Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and, of course, Iran - want Netanyahu to lose.”“Israel and the American-Israeli alliance have never been stronger, and Iran and its proxies have never been weaker,” he added.Israel 'very close' to creating regime change conditions in IranIn an October 15 interview with the Post, Falk said Israel was “very close” to creating conditions for regime change, while stressing that Iranians would have to determine their country's future.“Regime change in Iran is up to the Iranian people,” he said in that interview.His written remarks ahead of the election did not specify how the US and Israel should pursue or provide a timetable.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The Post prints Falk's claims that "Trump wants to work with Netanyahu" and that the "Trump-Netanyahu team" is suited to finishing "the job in Iran". It never says that 'the job' means renewed military strikes on Iran. It also never says that, days earlier, the Post itself reported Trump opposed and stopped Netanyahu's planned renewed strikes. The same day, CNN reported Trump refused Netanyahu's push for a joint attack before the election. Without this, a reader believes the two leaders are united on Iran, when the reporting shows Trump blocked Netanyahu's plan.

How we know

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Jerusalem Post relays a Netanyahu adviser's election-eve claim that the Trump-Netanyahu team is suited to removing Iran's government, and attributes his words. In its own narration the Post adopts his word 'regime' for Iran's government. It also does not mention its own recent report that Trump opposed the timing of Netanyahu's planned renewed strikes, a minor gap.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “the regime's removal”

    Why this matters
    In its closing sentence the Post writes "the regime's removal" in its own voice. It is no longer paraphrasing Falk's words.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes 'regime' as the neutral, settled description of Iran's government. The removal of that government reads as an ordinary policy goal.
    The context
    'Regime' is the adviser's word, carried into the outlet's narration. A plain report would say Iran's government and keep 'regime' inside Falk's quotation marks.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Removing the genocidal Ayatollah regime in Iran”

    Show it in the article

    “called for the removal of Iran's regime”

    Why this matters
    The Post paraphrases Falk in its own words and keeps his label 'Iran's regime' outside quotation marks.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes 'Iran's regime' as the outlet's own neutral term for the government in Tehran.
    The context
    The label belongs to Falk, who calls it the "genocidal Ayatollah regime". The outlet's paraphrase could have said Iran's government.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The Trump-Netanyahu team has shown to be suited”

    Show it in the article

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Post prints Falk's claims that "Trump wants to work with Netanyahu" and that the "Trump-Netanyahu team" is suited to finishing "the job in Iran". It never says that 'the job' means renewed military strikes on Iran. It also never says that, days earlier, the Post itself reported Trump opposed and stopped Netanyahu's planned renewed strikes. The same day, CNN reported Trump refused Netanyahu's push for a joint attack before the election. Without this, a reader believes the two leaders are united on Iran, when the reporting shows Trump blocked Netanyahu's plan.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 26 OctMecca defense pact faces test as Saudi delegation arrives for high-stakes Iran talks - analysis6.0
  2. 26 OctIraqi PM orders investigation into provincial council threats over closed Iran border crossing3.0
  3. 26 OctUS ready to strike Iran 'within 96 hours' of Trump's order, Israel pushes for joint attack - report3.0
  4. 26 OctHow purchases of sanctioned Iranian jet fuel were disguised by Myanmar 0.0
  5. 26 OctTop officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran, two sources say0.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post