Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on West Bank, 4 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

The quiet revolution in Hebron: 'The opportunities are there - we just need your support'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.5 findings

From reclaiming individual homes to establishing entire neighborhoods, Harchivi Makom Ohalech is . Following the establishment of the Gvura neighborhood and unprecedented growth, the nonprofit is inviting the public to become partners in its mission: "Every donation helps secure another home and more ancestral land for the Jewish people." The tens of thousands of visitors who have made their way to Ma’arat Hamachpela and the streets of Hebron in recent years can hardly miss the profound changes taking place in the city.

What began some 4,000 years ago, when Avraham Avinu purchased Ma’arat Hamachpela at full price, continues today through the work of Harchivi Makom Ohalech, an organization leading efforts to reclaim Jewish homes and land in the City of the Patriarchs. Become a partner in rebuilding Jewish Hebron! Join us and . Every donation makes a difference>>> In recent years, the nonprofit has expanded its activities beyond purchasing individual buildings to developing entire residential complexes and neighborhoods.

Its flagship project is the Gvura neighborhood, where five buildings that had stood seemingly abandoned and . Named in memory of eight residents of Kiryat Arba and Hebron who fell in Israel’s wars, the neighborhood now . Beyond its Zionist and historical significance, the renewed Jewish presence has also brought a dramatic improvement in security, .

Beit Ma'ale Doron, named in memory of attorney Doron Nir Zvi. Photo: Courtesy of Harchivi Makom Ohalech Today, the nonprofit manages 13 key buildings across Hebron, housing approximately 40 Jewish families. Yet the potential for further expansion is significantly greater. The organization reports an unprecedented number of inquiries from interested in selling their homes. “Not a day goes by without calls from owners who want to sell their homes," its representatives say.

Every proposed purchase undergoes an extensive review process, including rigorous legal checks, verification of ownership documents, site surveys, and drone photography, . However, the greatest obstacle to taking advantage of these historic opportunities . It is financial. Acquiring properties and developing the necessary infrastructure in Hebron requires investments totaling millions of shekels.

Become a partner in rebuilding Jewish Hebron! Join us and help bring the next home back into Jewish hands. Every donation makes a difference>>> “We haven’t reinvented the wheel. We’re simply returning home to our ancestral land," Harchivi representatives explain. “The homes are there, the sellers are approaching us, and we understand the significance of every home we reclaim. But to make the most of these opportunities and avoid missing a historic moment, we need the public’s help.

Reclaiming our land means paying for it in full, shekel by shekel, just as Avraham Avinu did." Beit Rachel and Leah, with Ma'arat Hamachpela in the background. Photo: Courtesy of Harchivi Makom Ohalech The nonprofit is now calling on Jews in Israel and around the world to take part in expanding the Jewish presence in Hebron: “Our goal is clear: a strong, growing Jewish Hebron. Every donation and every new partner brings us closer to reclaiming the next home."

: “This is a time of great blessing, with greater opportunities for continued growth than ever before. In recent years, we’ve transformed the Jewish presence throughout the city. But to continue this transformation, we need Jews everywhere to join us. Every donation, every partner, and every home reclaimed brings us closer to realizing our vision." Become a partner in rebuilding Jewish Hebron!

Join us and help bring the next home back into Jewish hands. Every donation makes a difference>>>

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (5)

Arutz Sheva runs a settler nonprofit's fundraising appeal in its news format and describes settlement expansion in occupied Hebron as reclaiming homes and building neighbourhoods. It never says Hebron is in the occupied West Bank or that the ICJ found the settlements illegal, and it tells readers the purchases meet all legal requirements. It calls Palestinians only Arabs, quotes only the nonprofit, and states the group's security claim as fact.

  1. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “expanding the Jewish presence in the City of the Patriarchs”

    Why this matters
    The words "expanding the Jewish presence" describe settlement building in Hebron with no mention that the city lies in the occupied West Bank.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this is ordinary growth of a community in its own city.
    The context
    Hebron is in the occupied West Bank. The ICJ found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal under international law. The article never uses the words occupied, settlement or West Bank, though the whole piece is about settlement expansion.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “occupied”, “occupation”, “settlement”, “illegal” and “West Bank”.

    Show it in the article

    “to ensure that each transaction meets all legal requirements”

    Why this matters
    The article tells readers that every purchase "meets all legal requirements", with no reference to international law.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the settlement project in Hebron is fully lawful.
    The context
    The ICJ's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank illegal under international law. Paperwork checks on a sale do not change that status, and the article never mentions it.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “is neither legal nor security-related”

    Why this matters
    The article dismisses any legal obstacle to the project and says the only barrier is money.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes there is no legal problem with moving settlers into Palestinian homes in Hebron.
    The context
    The ICJ found the occupation unlawful and the settlements illegal. The settlement project faces a fundamental legal obstacle under international law, which the article writes out entirely.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Harchivi Makom Ohalech buys property from Palestinians in Hebron to expand Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank. The International Court of Justice found in July 2024 that Israel's settlements there are illegal under international law.

  2. Uses the occupation's words

    Serious

    “have been transformed into a thriving Jewish neighborhood”

    Why this matters
    The article calls the Gvura settlement a "thriving Jewish neighborhood".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes this is a normal district of a city, like any other neighbourhood.
    The context
    It is a settlement built in occupied Hebron, which the ICJ found illegal under international law. The word settlement never appears in the article.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “help bring the next home back into Jewish hands”

    Why this matters
    The words "back into Jewish hands" present each purchase as a return of property to former owners.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the homes being bought were Jewish homes that are now being recovered.
    The context
    The article's own account says the sellers are Arab property owners, so these are homes owned by Palestinians that are being turned into settler housing.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“inquiries from Arab property owners interested in selling their homes”

    Show it in the article

    “provides a vital connection between Kiryat Arba and the Avraham Avinu and Beit Hadassah neighborhoods”

    Why this matters
    The article calls the settler enclaves in Hebron "neighborhoods" and presents linking them to Kiryat Arba as a public good.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the project connects ordinary city districts.
    The context
    Kiryat Arba and the Hebron enclaves are settlements in the occupied West Bank, and joining them extends settlement across Palestinian Hebron. The ICJ found the settlements illegal.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The nonprofit has turned five buildings once planned as a Palestinian commercial centre into the Gvura settlement, linking the Kiryat Arba settlement to settler enclaves inside occupied Hebron.

  3. Erases a people's national identity

    Minor

    “Arab property owners”

    Why this matters
    The article calls the people of Hebron who own the homes only "Arab property owners".
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the sellers are a generic Arab population with no national tie to the land being bought.
    The context
    Hebron is in the occupied Palestinian territory and its owners are Palestinians. The word Palestinian appears nowhere in the article, so the people whose city is being settled are written out as a people.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice found that Israel's laws and measures in the occupied Palestinian territory breach the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “were intended to become an Arab commercial center”

    Why this matters
    The article reduces the planned Palestinian use of the five buildings to "an Arab commercial center" and names no one behind it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the buildings had no real owners or community, only an ethnic label and a plan that lapsed.
    The context
    The buildings sit in occupied Palestinian Hebron. The article erases the Palestinian community whose commercial centre was replaced by a settlement.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice found that Israel's laws and measures in the occupied Palestinian territory breach the prohibition on racial segregation and apartheid.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  4. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “putting an end to gunfire and other terrorist attacks targeting the area”

    Why this matters
    The article states in its own voice that the settler presence has ended attacks, with no attribution to the nonprofit making the claim.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes it is established that settlement has made Hebron safe.
    The context
    This is the nonprofit's claim. Days earlier the same outlet reported a deadly attack on soldiers in Hebron and a large operation in the city that followed it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  5. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Miriam Fleischman, CEO of the Harchivi movement, emphasizes the opportunities ahead”

    Why this matters
    The article quotes only the nonprofit's CEO and representatives.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only the settler organisation's account of what is happening to Hebron's homes.
    The context
    No Palestinian resident, seller or neighbour is quoted. Even the claim that owners want to sell is told only by the nonprofit.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“calls from owners who want to sell their homes”
    • On the recordReporting on Israel's assault on Gaza and on the Greens' Zionism motion has given Israeli, pro-Israel and Israeli-government sources far more space than Palestinian voices, who are quoted least when the story concerns them.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 3 NovSix arrested as security forces uncover rocket-making terror cell in Jenin8.7
  2. 3 NovHilltop Youth receive advance warning, organize riots before evacuation6.0
  3. 2 NovDisturbing footage from Hilltop outpost: Tumultuous evacuation near Ariel6.0
  4. 1 NovFallen soldiers' comrades take Part in demolition of terrorists' homes3.0
  5. 31 OctIDF releases recordings of terrorist house demolition7.3

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News