Times of Israel, on Targeting

6.0out of 10Serious

Change bloc , unity government, or new election

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Change bloc alliance with Arabs, unity government, or new election: 3 scenarios for what comes next

With both pro- and anti-Netanyahu blocs well short of a majority after tallying of most ballots, analysts dissect the most likely ways forward, some of which would involve party leaders breaking key promises

JTA — As election results from Tuesday’s Knesset election continue to trickle in, what seems clearest is that no side in this political race will have enough votes to form a majority government, meaning the question of who the next prime minister will be remains uncertain.

With over 85 percent of votes counted so far, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party has 26 seats, and his bloc of right-wing and ultra-Orthodox parties has 53 seats, falling short of the 61 needed to form a majority government in the 120-member parliament.

Yashar, the party led by Netanyahu’s main rival, former IDF chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, looks set to be the second-largest party, with around 21 seats. The Zionist anti-Netanyahu so-called change bloc that Eisenkot leads had 48 seats, also far short of what is needed to form a government on its own.

Meanwhile, , which key elements of both blocs have said they wouldn’t include in a coalition, are on pace to get 19 seats collectively — a record — and may become key to helping the opposition oust Netanyahu.

The formal process whereby each party holds consultations with President Isaac Herzog to recommend a candidate for prime minister will likely begin next week. Political analysts are already speculating on possible scenarios.

Their tentative takeaway: Reality may force political leaders to break their solemn promises not to work with certain other parties.

So what are the possible scenarios if the final results leave the political arena so starkly divided? Here are the three most likely outcomes.

1. The change bloc plus the Arab parties

All the parties in the change bloc bar The Democrats, led by Yair Golan, stated throughout their campaigns that they would not form a government with , even though Mansour Abbas, the leader of Ra’am, an Islamist faction, joined a diverse coalition in 2021-2022, breaking what had once been a taboo. Abbas is again offering to join forces with the change bloc.

“Clearly this is emerging as an option mathematically and politically,” Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Wednesday. But he added: “It’s obviously not only a violation of campaign promises, but I think the Israeli public opinion is deeply unprepared for such an option.” Tolerance for working with an Islamist party has diminished since the deadly October 7, 2023, Hamas-led onslaught.

Another variation on this option is for the change bloc — Eisenkot’s Yashar party, B’Yachad, led by former prime ministers Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid, and Avigdor Liberman’s Yisrael Beytenu party, as well as The Democrats — to form a minority government.

While 61 seats are needed to form a majority government, there is nothing to prevent a government with fewer than 61 seats from being formed if it can gain support on key legislative decisions.

This could happen if on key votes but otherwise don’t play a role in the government. This would give the change bloc up to 67 seats when Arab parties’ support from the sidelines is added in.

Even this step has been rejected by Liberman, yet Prof. Jonathan Rynhold, of the Department of Political Studies at Bar-Ilan University, said it was possible that Eisenkot could put pressure on him to accept.

“Even though Liberman has said no to such an option, he might say yes if he’s the prime minister,” Rynhold posited.

On the other hand, the Arab parties, especially the Joint List, might demand concessions for such an agreement that Eisenkot himself finds hard to stomach.

2. Formation of a unity government

A quick look at the political map following Tuesday’s vote shows that center-right parties ranging from Eisenkot’s Yashar party to Liberman’s Yisrael Beytenu, with Likud and B’Yachad in between, gained a substantial share of the seats. One possible scenario is that some of these parties, even though they are avowed political foes, could join forces.

“I think it is perhaps more likely that there will be serious negotiations around a unity government,” Plesner said. “I would imagine that Netanyahu would prefer unity based on him forming a coalition with all of his bloc members, and then luring one of the change bloc parties to his government.” That would mean including ultra-Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism and far-right parties led by Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich.

However, Plesner said the change bloc parties would most likely push for a “real unity government,” whereby Netanyahu “gives up on one of the far-right parties that has caused a lot of challenges for Israel’s international image, or perhaps an ultra-Orthodox party that has refused to pass a military draft bill.” He was referring to a law that would force more Haredi men to serve in the military, from which they’ve traditionally been exempted.

This, he said, would create a “Zionist, more centrist-leaning option.”

“I think this is something that Israeli public opinion would be able to live with and perhaps even prefer, but I can’t say anything about the political viability of it,” Plesner said.

The change bloc ran on replacing Netanyahu, and no doubt many of its voters would feel betrayed by such an outcome.

3. Another round of elections

In his election night speech, Eisenkot declared that “after an election with such high voter turnout, it would be a mistake to hold another election.” Some 77.7% of voters cast ballots, the highest since 1999, according to election officials.

However, with no bloc reaching a majority and serious ideological disagreements among the parties, another round of elections might be the most likely possibility. For the long-serving Netanyahu in particular, allowing the process to play out while he retains his position as interim prime minister until another election is held could well be the most favorable outcome, according to Plesner.

A similar scenario played out beginning in 2019, when Netanyahu’s bloc of supporters failed to achieve a majority. Israel then held a series of elections, culminating in the March 2021 vote, when Netanyahu’s bloc was ousted by a center-left alliance led by Bennett and Lapid. The November 2022 election returned Netanyahu to power.

“I don’t really know what the path forward is now,” said Gideon Rahat, a political scientist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

“If we were talking 10 years ago, I would say that something else might happen – a unity government or a different solution perhaps,” he said. But given the entrenched political camps at this point, another round of elections might be where the country is headed.

On the other hand, given the unpredictable nature of Israel’s political scene, Plesner noted that it could be a “time for politicians to get creative.”

“I wouldn’t be surprised if all sorts of ideas that we haven’t thought of before come up in the upcoming few weeks,” he said, adding that he believed that, with so much uncertainty, it could “take weeks and perhaps months” before the next prime minister is determined.

Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Times of Israel, running a JTA report, describes the parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel only as "Arabs", "Arab parties" and "Arab factions" in its own voice, including in the headline. The article never uses the word Palestinian, so readers of its account of a record result for these parties do not learn who these citizens are as a people.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “alliance with Arabs”

    Why this matters
    The headline says the change bloc might form an "alliance with Arabs". It names a people only by an ethnic label, and treats political parties as a whole ethnic group.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the possible partners to be simply "Arabs" inside Israel, a group with no national identity, and the coalition question to be about allying with an ethnic group.
    The context
    The parties concerned represent Palestinian citizens of Israel. In Smooha's 2019 survey most Arab citizens chose a self-description containing Palestinian. The article never uses the word Palestinian anywhere, so the headline's label is the only identity a reader receives.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “Israel’s Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice the article introduces the parties as "Israel's Arab parties". That ties them to the state and to an ethnic label, at the moment it reports their record result.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking a record 19 seats went to Israeli ethnic minority parties, with no link to the Palestinian people.
    The context
    These are Palestinian-led parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel, most of whom identified as Palestinian in the survey evidence. The article's account of their record result never says so.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    “either of the Arab parties”

    Why this matters
    In reporting the change bloc's refusal to govern with them, the article again calls these parties only "the Arab parties".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the boycott to be about ethnically Arab parties, and does not learn that it is a refusal to share power with the parties of Palestinian citizens.
    The context
    Identity is the heart of this passage, because it concerns whether these citizens' representatives can be partners in government at all. The article never identifies those citizens as Palestinian.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Arab factions support the change bloc”

    Why this matters
    Here the article calls the parties "Arab factions", which reduces elected parties to factions defined only by ethnicity.
    The impression it gives
    A reader sees outside "factions" lending votes from the sidelines, with no national identity, which makes them easier to see as marginal.
    The context
    These are elected parties of Palestinian citizens of Israel, and they hold a record share of seats according to the article itself.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

Everything we scored from Times of Israel

See how 316 outlets covered this story