Ynet News (English), on Targeting, 27 October 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Israel's election exposed a dangerous double standard: , Haredim demonized

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

No one yet knows the actual election results, but one thing is already certain: , with their parties projected to win a record number of Knesset seats. It is easy to understand the enthusiasm that has swept through the Arab public, particularly the Bedouin community. Their leaders openly discuss their national aspirations. Mansour Abbas has spoken of the autonomous Bedouin regions he would like to see established in the Negev and Galilee.

He has also declared that his party would work to prevent the demolition of illegally constructed homes in the Negev, while . But what drove voters to the polls was not necessarily those positions themselves. Rather, it was the support and legitimacy these aspirations received from leaders of the left-wing bloc, who made no secret of their desire and plans to rely on Arab parties to establish a minority government.

Once the left gave those aspirations the green light, Ra'am and Joint List voters developed an appetite for political influence. While these dangerous aspirations were granted unjustifiable legitimacy, another community was subjected to extreme demonization: the ultra-Orthodox. They became the punching bag of the left and of many who made the country's fate dependent on drafting ultra-Orthodox men into the military immediately. The possibility of conducting a difficult but essential dialogue with a community that is an integral part of Israeli society and the Jewish people became virtually impossible.

Yet somehow became acceptable. The rate of military enlistment among ultra-Orthodox men continues to rise. There are extremists who make a great deal of noise, but there are also many who want to integrate into broader society. They, too, have faced vicious delegitimization. The possibility of conducting a difficult but essential dialogue with a community that is an integral part of Israeli society and the Jewish people became virtually impossible.

Yet relying on those who refuse to condemn Hamas somehow became acceptable. In the process of frightening us about the ultra-Orthodox, it became acceptable to normalize not "Arabs" as a whole, but those who openly seek to change the identity of the State of Israel. There is plenty of room to criticize the ultra-Orthodox community. But the treatment of a group that is an inseparable part of Israeli society and the Jewish people, some of whose members serve in the IDF, work and contribute to society, demands serious soul-searching.

We are already paying the price, reflected in the astronomical numbers of voters supporting those who seek Bedouin autonomy, not in Gaza, Sinai or Lebanon, but in the Negev and Galilee. Correcting course must begin with genuine soul-searching, both among the political leadership and throughout Israeli society. We must end the incitement and delegitimization directed at the ultra-Orthodox, engage them in substantive dialogue about military service, employment and contributing to the country, and seek solutions that will enable broader integration into society.

At the same time, clear boundaries must be established for anyone seeking to undermine Israel's security or change its character.

Read the original article on ynetnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Ynet's column calls Palestinian citizens of Israel only "Arab voters", "the Arab public" and "Arab parties" in its own voice, and never once names them as Palestinian. It also states as fact that Mansour Abbas and his fellow candidates refuse to recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation, then repeats the charge twice against "those who refuse to condemn Hamas". It gives no quotation, date or source for any of these claims.

  1. Erases a people's national identity

    Serious

    “Arab parties embraced”

    Why this matters
    The headline calls the parties Palestinian citizens of Israel voted for "Arab parties" in the outlet's own voice.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes these parties and their voters to be an ethnic bloc inside Israel, with no national identity of their own.
    The context
    Survey evidence shows most of these citizens describe themselves as Palestinian. In Smooha's 2019 survey, 61.9% chose a self-description that included Palestinian. The column never uses the word Palestinian anywhere.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)
    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “Palestinian”.

    Show it in the article

    “Arab voters turned out in enormous numbers”

    Why this matters
    The opening sentence reports the record turnout, which is the event the column is built on, and calls the voters only "Arab voters".
    The impression it gives
    A reader understands the record turnout as an "Arab" phenomenon, cut off from the Palestinian people these citizens belong to.
    The context
    These are Palestinian citizens of Israel. Their national identity is part of who turned out and why, and the supplied survey evidence records that most of them describe themselves as Palestinian.

    How we know

    • Our analysis“61.9% chose a description of themselves that included Palestinian”Palestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers
    • On the recordIn Sammy Smooha's April-June 2019 survey of 718 adult Arab citizens of Israel, including Druze and Bedouin, 61.9% chose a self-description containing Palestinian. This is historical survey evidence, not a 2026 percentage or proof of any individual's identity. Arab and Palestinian identities can coexist.newscord.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

  2. Smears a named person

    Serious

    “he and his fellow candidates refuse to recognize Hamas as a terrorist organization”

    Why this matters
    The column states in its own voice, as settled fact, that Mansour Abbas and his fellow candidates refuse to recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established that a named party leader and his candidates take Hamas's side.
    The context
    The column gives no quotation, date, occasion or source for this charge. It prints no response from Abbas or his party.

    Show it in the article

    “relying on those who refuse to condemn Hamas”

    Why this matters
    The column widens the charge from refusing a terrorist designation to refusing to condemn Hamas at all. It now applies it to the parties the left might rely on as a group.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Palestinian-led parties as a whole will not condemn Hamas.
    The context
    Nothing in the column shows any named candidate refusing to condemn Hamas. The only basis offered is the unsourced assertion about Abbas in S5.

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    If the column has a source, it should attribute the charge and give it: for example, who says Abbas and his candidates have not called Hamas a terrorist organisation, when, and what Abbas has said in answer.

How other outlets reported it

Our analysisPalestinian citizens of Israel voted in record numbers

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Ynet News (English)

Everything we scored from Ynet News (English)

See how 316 outlets covered this story